I meant that I've had some flavor of Apple Pro product under my desk for 10 years, upgrading every 1-3 years. Not the same machine all that time

Could this be the processor for a new Mac Pro? Or will Apple wait for Ivy Bridge.

I've had a Mac Pro (or its predecessor) under my desk for over 10 years now; upgrading regularly. Even if its not the top selling Apple Product, its still the machine that Pros are looking for.

Not only can it scale, but eventually you get a very distributed power network (think solar panel on every rooftop & mini windmill in every backyard)

The worst part (or best, depending on your perspective) is that he's probably cool with you not buying the TV, since he was going to make as much profit from the cable as from the TV.

A tax cut while in a deficit situation is just a future tax increase.
Why do you want to keep raising taxes on your kids?

Sounds like a challenge...

Only Thomas and Breyer dissented; one of the most conservative, and one of the most liberal.

During the last Canadian election, seniors (in mostly Liberal-leaning areas) were robocalled and told that there voting place had changed. Does "free speech" include the right to lie to people in an attempt to reduce the voter turnout of a specific group of voters?

(Its been a while since I posted, and I really did forget what my sig said)

Such an agency would be inherently biased, because as Stephen Colbert has taught us, the facts and reality have a liberal bias!

You think his UID is old...

The only way to sell it to the masses would be to promote it as the elimination of Income Taxes. Set a date (20 years?) by which point income taxes will be eliminated, and slowly ramp up the Carbon (GHG) tax while reducing income tax over the same period of time.

What? You're opposed to eliminating Income Tax?

The majority of Canadians oppose the Conservatives. It is an unfortunate bug in our system of government that the centre-left and left-wing parties that together represents well over 60% of Canadians are in opposition at the moment.

As a Canadian, I can assure you that he most certainly is the Canadian version of Don Rumsfeld. And the Prime Minister is our very own Dick Cheney. (He's not Bush, he's much smarter than that, which makes him all the more dangerous)

This is the reason I play. I recognize the virtual impossibility of winning the jackpot, but between the time I buy the ticket and the time of the draw (or whenever I get around to checking my numbers) I get significant pleasure (far more than $1 worth) imagining what I would do if I won the jackpot.

However, giving this reason for playing, perhaps the most rational course of action would be to only buy one ticket, and simply never check the numbers...