Journal Journal: Well, this is a bummer 1
So now this place wants to look like a cross between Lollipop and iOS!
Yuck!
Okay, it's not entirely yucky. I can zoom all the way in now and line wrap works! Yay!
So now this place wants to look like a cross between Lollipop and iOS!
Yuck!
Okay, it's not entirely yucky. I can zoom all the way in now and line wrap works! Yay!
*pro-pot propaganda* is proof enough of what you are...
I kind of addressed that here.
Look what it's done to us!
You don't need 'legitimacy'. You gotta have faith!
Come out! And accept your punishment, with shall be death by burning at the stake! You're a witch!
Fuck all this! Make the damn politicians who write the damn laws reveal their sponsors! Then maybe they can complain about other people
Your Wisconsin doppelganger has already taken his place.
You can win! The numbers are there!
Do it!
That hat would look just as good on you.
In the 50s it was container shipping that caused all the fuss that made the papers.
Everything but the mail room, huh?
You cannot justify a stupid policy just by pointing out that we already do something else that is even stupider.
Sometimes your prescription needs an antidote of sorts to counter the side effects.
There's only one party that's corrupt? Or are you talking about the republi-crat party?
Yes, there is only one (forked tongue) party that gets 98% of the votes every election.
Voters should at least pay attention to who they are voting for. Basic background history of these people is all over the internet. If working the system is off the table, then the simplest thing to do is for everybody to vote for any other name not associated with the dem/reps. There is no need to tell everybody everyday until the election, they just need to do it, without any discussion. Non-voters are a majority block by a wide margin. If they all came out and voted against the dem/reps, the problem is solved. But regardless any of that, it is not anybody's fault but the voters. They simply must learn to tune out the liars who make big promises.
One has already supplied his answer.
I'll let you have the last word again as I'm tired of your nonsense.
I neither require your attention or response. I'm just pointing you out to the rest.
*pro-pot propaganda* is direct quote, nothing unsupported there. It's right there for everybody to see. You needn't post anymore to confirm what you are.
You are a prohibitionist. As such you are illogical, irrational, arrogant, and totally unreasonable. That makes the concept of 'discussion' a complete farce. As a prohibitionist you are incapable of 'discussion'. And to discuss the subject at all with them is to give them credibility they don't deserve, because a prohibitionist has no credibility and deserves no respect, time, and attention. They only deserve contempt and endless ridicule like any other religious fanatic until they are pushed back into their caves and sealed shut for all eternity. The only thing to do with a prohibitionist to to point them out in the crowd and tell them to fuck off. They are most despicable. Repent! Crawl out of the slime and join the human race...
No need, after *pro-pot propaganda* it's all bullshit. You have made your position perfectly clear, yet you live in denial, or are trolling. Doesn't matter either way, it just needs to be understood that you aren't serious, except that you find the collateral damage perfectly acceptable, just a regular weasel. I do credit you for clarifying many things though, so for that, thanks.
SCUD printers, sneaking around in the night, printing bootleg taillight covers for any make of car.
"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne