Comment Re:'Bout time (Score 2) 175
Don't blame them. Blame the people who take their money. You have a chance to vote them out very soon. Go for it...
Don't blame them. Blame the people who take their money. You have a chance to vote them out very soon. Go for it...
After the lawyers get theirs, how much is left over for construction? Well, I wish them the best of luck, and hope they just build it, despite what some judge who is paid to tie things up for a good long time says.
It just doesn't work. Mexico is a perfect example. The same party held power for many decades. The same is true in the US at this point. Term limits will do nothing but pacify people. That would be the only reason to do it. Try to string them a little longer.
If your thesis held true, then why wouldn't parties parade fresher, relatively younger faces to gain more power?
Why? With a 95% reelection rate, where is the incentive? And besides they do put their young in the tank when they feel the time is right. They are professionals and put on a good show. You are free to jump in and try to do it better.
Sorry, there is only one way to kill the power, but you won't accept it. It makes things a little too level. Don't sweat a thing. It ain't gonna happen... so charades it will be. The show must go on!
It's an old radio signal thing. Generally we don't like multipath.
Term limits are bullshit, completely and utterly superficial. The party and its patrons still remain in power. You have to vote them out, or you accomplish nothing. Instituting term limits is just an attempt to pass the blame.
Who cares? I hope they never, ever allow editing. It would be the worst thing ever.
Damn good thing. Editing a post is a crime against humanity. Just amend it.
I hope you mean multiplex. Usually multipath is a bad thing
*sigh* You still play your silly little game... No, I said, clean the house, not rearrange the furniture. Get the Zamboni... Leave no trace of the previous occupants. The senate will take a little longer, but you can start now and show where the real power is. Failure to do so really makes all the complaints sound so dumb.
It doesn't matter. Enough of them already have, so that the rest have no choice if they want to use Apple products.
There are a lot of things wrong with the American legal system, but its attitude toward free speech is not one of them.
Still, the cost of protecting it is way too high. We have to find a way to reverse the charges onto the damn censors.
I like sans-serif. Just the letter, no embellishment. Works better with bad vision. Serifs can create weird optical illusions. Arial is probably my favorite.
Gee, who woulda guessed? Are Polish jokes still in vogue?
But small fish ? Remove it don't be evil don't ruibn the life of people with small stuff which would have been forgotten if only a search engine did not exists).
No, you should condemn the people who make judgements based on stupid pictures and statements. They are the ones who act in bad faith and should be sanctioned. Google is a search engine. Let them search, and let the user filter the results, not the state, or even Google itself. I can only wish that Google holds fast (though I know they don't), and tells the censors to go to hell. We must kick them to the side of the road with whatever methods we have.
All this will do is create further inequities in society.
Well, that is the idea, so it's only natural for laws like this to get passed. They are written by the people who need them most.
Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.