Why would this be a problem?

As in what, precisely, would be wrong with allowing parents to use your trademark of a beloved children's character on their dead kids' tombstones?

I'm having a hard time accepting that you think people deserve/don't deserve to have a fictional fucking comic book character's logo on their damn tombstone.

I mean, OK, you want to be that way? What, then, did Reeve or Reeves ever do that was super? Save a baby from a burning building? Or did they just act in a couple of crappy films? What's so damn super about that?

If anyone "deserves" a Superman logo on their grave, it's the soldiers who sacrifice themselves to save their buddies, by throwing themselves on a grenade, for example. Or firemen in general. Or yea, maybe a little boy who endured some shit that no child should ever go through. Not some B-list actor who sucked at riding horses.

Well good, it gives me hope for humanity that a lot of people instantly recognize ignorant shit-speak when they see it.

It's corporate bullshit all the way down...

Either way.

As in most things, there are moronic arguments on both sides of the Bitcoin/Uber debates.

This is exactly what I was thinking. Show them for the heartless bastards they are.

Hell, if I knew a granite man, I'd have one made and deliver it myself.

Well, some of them are.

But you have to admit, a lot of the arguments are Bitcoin-level stupid.

It's easy to undercut the competition when they adhere to regulations and you don't.

Yea, see, I always thought you meant it the other way around.

And now I know, at least until I forget. Which probably won't take long.

That is not within the scope of the patent, from what I've read.

Personally, I don't know if I'd want to get in a plane whose pilot doesn't have any "skin in the game," so to speak.

I never said anything about difficulty. I said that some people find the practice of digging about in a pocket for a timepiece, when they could more easily keep one strapped to a wrist, to be stupid.

Which is an absolute fact (that some people feel that way, not that it's necessarily a stupid action).

My question is, why does it matter to you the reasons other people do things you don't? Don't try to say it doesn't, as it's plainly obvious you care at least enough to make a remark about it, then respond to someone who replied to your remark.

Well, it suggests you don't live somewhere anymore.

The where that you no longer live still seems ambiguous without additional information.

Judging from the drawings, and the statements that Airbus has made bragging about how they can now put the cockpit anywhere in the plane (because of the lack of need for front-viewing), I'm going to guess that's not in the plans.

That not irony. Declaring independence from the British Crown was an illegal act as well.

You assume so, anyway.

If a baby can be taught sign language, it's not a far cry to think they could also be taught the sign for "quiet place," and understand it.

That is exactly the problem - most people (shy of that one asshole who hates everything) have absolutely no problem with responsible parent, who actually takes care of their child's needs and does their best to avoid causing too much disruption for others. It's the lazy fucks who ignore their screaming brood while they stuff their own faces and check Facebook that tend to piss even the most polite, non-confrontational non-parent right off.

Fuck that, if I wanted to be responsible for raising a child, I'd have one of my own. Maybe, if those "parents" are tired of rearing their offspring, they should have thought of that before making the decision to bring another human life into this world.

If raising and caring for your own child is too much for you to handle, get fixed and give them up for adoption. DO NOT expect society to do your parenting job for you.