I'm pretty sure "You have a $320 cable bill?" was supposed to be a rhetorical question...

Wow. This would nearly make sense (sad though it may be that a majority of people in this country might still cling to the belief that it is somehow bad or wrong to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender) if the majority actually got what they wanted on most issues. If that were the case, we'd have universal health care (look at the volumes of data from places that do legit polling, like Pew, Quinnipiac, and Gallup, not the major news outlets that are really only good for showing pictures of people with health care protesting universal health care for others), we'd be out of Afghanistan (again, the majority of public opinion favors getting out), we wouldn't have given billions of dollars of bailout money to the banks that collapsed the global economy, and Bush never would have been elected in 2000 (remember, the larger number of votes, aka "majority" didn't vote for him.) And those are just the glaring examples.

Thank you for your remarkably insightful commentary.

Actually, what some of these CEO's did was pretty plainly illegal. See - Lehman Brothers and the use of Repo 105. NY Times has a good breakdown. You can find it here: http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/the-british-origins-of-lehmans-accounting-gimmick/ Even their own internal legal review determined that the practice was illegal in the US, hence the need to do it secretly in England.

Yeah, because THAT's the important thing, making sure you get to keep all of your super cool lingo pristine. Forget about bringing useful technology to people who could use it. How can that possibly make anything better?

Wait, tazers seemed harmless?

Being informed about new technology and being aware of the possible negative/intrusive/liberty restricting uses of that technology is not scaremongering, it's called being a good citizen. Let's not put our heads in the sand just because the device has some positives. It also has negatives. To loosely quote Ben Franklin, Those who are willing to give up freedom to gain security will gain neither. The job of a good citizen to to be informed and engage in useful debate, not to try to sound witty or hipper than thou by tossing around terms like luddite and scaremongering to try and intimidate people. Perhaps that's the irony here, the use of the term scaremongering to, well, scare and intimidate people. Nice job.