Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Original Firefox goals forgotten... (Score 1) 252

Instead of being a small, simple browser that just did one thing well; Firefox has become way too bloated and indeed the plans for the future seem to impart it with a ribbon-like interface and more nonsensical things. Doesn't sound too good for a nice well-loved product.

I agree. I've been victimized by the "upgrades" to a once-fast browser. Just one day I will open it and it will be upgrading itself. Wait, wait, must restart, etc. Now some ad-ons don't work anymore, gotta go look manually for up them, and so on. Hang on, did I say I wanted a Firefox upgrade? No, it just happens.

Comment Re:America? (Score 1) 462

I think you're confused about the English language! "In America" certainly includes any country in either North or South America. You're probably US American and went to a horrible "school" and therefore can be forgiven. ;)

No, the phrase that includes any country in North or South America is "en america" (saying it in Spanish, that is).

Comment Re:Hit'em in their wallets (Score 1) 462

Yeah, but a system that is still a pain. Lets see, if I'm unhappy about the level of service of my current utility what are my options? Not a whole lot. If I don't like my bank there are at least 5 within about 5 miles where I live. On the other hand if I don't like my utility company (and for the record I don't) my options are to either move far away and thats about it. Utility companies are inflexible, charge outrageous rates, have low standards of service, and have unexplained long blackouts. I'm confident that a Windows server can have a higher uptime than some utility companies... Just because the electricity is -mostly- on doesn't mean that its a great system.

A little talked-about advantage of having solar panels + battery backup at your home is that you get reliability and close to 100% uptime for your electricity needs. (The entire block could be in a blackout but you have your own power source.)

I'd definitely recommend looking into solar power.

Comment Re:Hit'em in their wallets (Score 2, Interesting) 462

Well, the energy sector has traditionally been heavily regulated, and works well compared to the huge mess the deregulated banking system made of itself. You do realize that the government took over the entire banking sector because certain bankers failed to run the companies they managed rather than let the companies go bankrupt so the assets could be put under better management?

There, fixed that for you.

Comment Re:Good luck with that (Score 1) 462

I'm suddenly curious at whether, statistically, this use of the word steal garners as much commentary as the copyright infringement use of the word steal does, on slashdot.

Since most /.ers are college students or live in their parents' basement (and in either case don't pay income taxes), probably not. :P

Comment Re:Pissed at the bail-outs (Score 1) 1259

Ever think about what effect free food has on the target country's local agriculture economy? I'll give you a hint: Local farmers have to start competing with free. The answer isn't dumping free food onto people--it's investing in infrastructure so that functional and stable markets can develop.

... Which is accomplished by bombing the shit out of them how, exactly?

Well, no one's bombed the shit out of Ethiopia for example, yet this article from Time Magazine explains the problem: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1829841,00.html

Quote from article: "...for countries receiving their charity, long-term food aid can become addictive. Why bother with development when shortfalls are met by aid? Ethiopian farmers can't compete with free food, so they stop trying. Over time, there's a loss of key skills, and a country that doesn't have to feed itself soon becomes a country that can't. All too often, its rulers use resources elsewhere — Ethiopia has one of Africa's largest armies."

Comment Re:Pissed at the bail-outs (Score 1) 1259

Hey, I have a better idea. Let's take just 1% of that trillion dollars per year, and use it to feed EVERY SINGLE !@## STARVING KID THE WORLD OVER. Yes, that's all it would take. A Billion dollars per year could by a handful of rice, corn, or wheat to put into the hands of every single starving kid in the world.

Ever think about what effect free food has on the target country's local agriculture economy? I'll give you a hint: Local farmers have to start competing with free. The answer isn't dumping free food onto people--it's investing in infrastructure so that functional and stable markets can develop.

There was an interesting story in Time Magazine about that last year. It was about Ethiopian farmers, and it turns out that they are suffering big time, simply because it's impossible for them to sell their crops locally when their potential customers are receiving western food aid for free. So the whole ironic thing about aid from the west is that it keeps people locked into poverty and dependence.

Comment Re:Agreed (Score 1) 1259

I'll be graduating next summer with a Masters in IT Management. (Undergrad in Simulation Design Engineering) 75k or so in loans, and the year I went to college they jacked up the interest rate to 6.8%.

And to everyone saying its unsecured debt needs to actually look into their facts. Student Loans can not be bankrupt on, if I don't pay, the gubmint will dock my pay. Which actually is a better deal that paying the loans, the max they can dock is 15% per check, and my loans will be way more than that to actually pay.

The loans are government backed, they should be no interest.

You can do an income contingent repayment plan: http://www.direct.ed.gov/RepayCalc/dlindex2.html

Comment Re:CO2 cutbacks cannot stop climate change (Score 1) 271

The science is lost entirely in the noise.

Most of the temperature data is seriously flawed in that there is a great influence of the urban heat island effect on the overall data.

If you look only at the rural sites in the US over 111 years, you see a cyclic pattern but no overall warming. The cities are getting warmer but overall, the real temperatures are not going up. Its like measuring the temperature in the forest near a campfire. That does not reflect the real temperature.

Check out Youtube, Global Warming Urban Heat Effect.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcsvaCPYgcI

enjoy. By the way, I am a scientist and do a lot of data analysis. This was done with my son. I have spent hundreds of hours checking the data at the GISS site. It is sadly to say, very flawed. I did not believe it until I checked it myself.
Thank you

Comment Re:Your integrity is your own (Score 1) 344

No matter what the headhunter or someone else does, your integrity is attached to you as an individual. If you are dishonest, nobody thinks 'ABC contractor is dishonest', they think 'Captain Sarcastic is dishonest', and that follows you when you leave ABC. In fact, if they are being dishonest or even just reckless with the truth, I would avoid association with ABC; that also might follow you wherever you go.

Yes, integrity is definitely extremely important. For example, if you tell me "I quit my previous job", you could have gotten fired for:

a) Failing a drug test
b) Sexual harrassment
c) Incompetence
d) Stealing
e) Surfing porn on the job
f) Inability to report to work ontime and stay awake, or
g) A multitude of smaller sins.

I will never know the truth, since in today's environment your previous employer will only reveal, "Yes, John worked here from January 2004 until May 2009", period. No more.

The hiring risk is on me. For that reason, I behave like I am looking at used cars. Some may be fine, but I have to assume many have been wrecked, flooded or abused in some way. I cannot trust the "salesman" (you) to tell me the truth. My job is to manage the risk for my company in the hiring decision.

Your integrity is your own, it's attached to you as an individual, and any competent employer will DEFINITELY look at it first and foremost.

Comment Re:Headhunter? WTF for? (Score 2, Informative) 344

Let me get this right, for almost 39 weeks now, we've been seeing an additional 500,000 people unemployed every two weeks. I can't pick up a paper without reading about more layoffs...

Rather than answer the question, I'd like to pose another one: Why are headhunters even needed?

I am an employer. I can't imagine using a headhunter right now. Why? Because there are millions of people to choose from. I don't need help finding people at all. There are more jobs than people. Call me when there are more people than jobs. That's when I need (and will pay for) a headhunter. I am 100% certain I am not alone.

I am a manager at a large Fortune 500 company, and I have hired a fair number of people for accounting positions in the company. I certainly won't rule out a person who is out of work, but I certainly have a bias towards people still in their job. Here is what goes through my head when I see a person applying for my position who is unemployed:

a) Where they fired for cause?
b) Were they laid off, and thus at the bottom of the performance rankings at their previous company?
c) If they quit (to find another job), isn't their judgement sound enough to stay with their current job until they find another?

If your spouse has taken a job in another city, and you are the "trailing spouse", the question of unemployment (in the new city) is easy to answer....and I don't mind hiring such an individual.

If your previous company has outsourced the entire department to another country or location, that is also a very easy answer.

But your answer needs to address the three questions I posed. If you cannot satisfactorily answer them, I will probably lean towards hiring the guy who currently has a job (assuming you have similar qualifications). That is because you pose a risk to me (I am afraid you might be a problem employee), while I can be more confident that the guy who is currently employed can keep a job and perform.

Best wishes.

Comment Re:I dont' see it this way (Score 1) 385

I agree, the Android may catch up to the iPhone in a few years, but Apple is way, way ahead.

I own both and the iPhone hands down is better, more intuitive, more fun, more interesting, etc etc, and every day there are a gazillion new apps to play with

I use the GPS on my iPhone constantly, and I love having instant access to the internet to look things up -- info, phone numbers, addresses, whatever. I don't really use it for games or movies, but it is nice having my music collection with me.

Slashdot Top Deals

Thus spake the master programmer: "Time for you to leave." -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming"

Working...