Comment Re:So, follow Denmark's example: EV's (Elec Cars) (Score 1) 430
Win, win, win...
Vapor, vapor, vapor.
If we all had flying unicorns then we wouldn't need gas guzzling cars. But we don't have flying unicorns.
Win, win, win...
Vapor, vapor, vapor.
If we all had flying unicorns then we wouldn't need gas guzzling cars. But we don't have flying unicorns.
Here in Alaska (which really should be part of Canada, you guys interesting in invading anytime soon?) we have three seasons - July, August and Winter. And that's in a good year.
Socialist? Commie?
Sorry, can't hear you at 160 mph on my bmw bike, as the radio is playing loud something from spotify (oh, mobile internet here is fast and cheap, by the way)
Shut. Up.
You'll get yours when you find out you have to bail out the rest of the EU. Including your friends the Frogs.
Shut up and learn from Germany - where gas costs 7 bucks a gallon, but there are almost no accidents on the roads (did I mention they don't have a speed limit?), the cars are BMW, Mercedes, Porsche and Audi, not Ford and whatever shitty brand GM uses, where cars are better, more economic, faster and in general more efficient than american crap made to last one year and be replaced.. And even though this country has a WAY better form of public transport by bus, train, metro, tram and bike.
Grow up and go see the world.
Socialist Commie.
LA LA LA LA LA!
We can't hear you! (That's because AT&T sucks but we shall save that for another rant.)
You make a best effort, but a mathematical proof (which is what you allude to) that the plane is demonstrably safe is simply impossible.
What makes you think I allude to any such thing. I work in security, I know that you can not prove some things outside of theory due to the complexities involved. I actually don't care about the method of proving at this point, I'm making an argument about who should be responsible for providing the proof.
And frankly, when you want to, say, bypass the corporate firewall with a dial-up modem straight to the financial database server, it is not the job of the CSO to prove that your setup is insecure, it is your job to prove that your setup is secure.
Not mathematically, but the usual "best practice" / "reasonable doubt", etc. standards.
Huh, why is there so much Chinese construction crap in the yards these days (I use the term 'crap' on purpose')? They have long figured out how to make export only items and size them, finish them, etc. specifically for the market.
We have Chinese 'gypsum board', ABS pipe, EMT and a plastic stuff up the toilet drain. About the only thing I've seen that has never been Chinese is dimensional lumber and I expect that it's simply not economical to ship stuff like that over.
I take it you're not an Apple fan. Apple seems hell bent on ignoring pretty much every UI convention it ever wrote in it's own brain dead attempt to make a "One Ring" interface by wedging iOS and OS X into the molten cracks of the pits of Mordor^HCupertino.
"You'd make a grown man cry."
For once, Microsoft marketing got it right.
Neither has anyone at Microsoft.
Give him a break. When you're foaming at the mouth and hyperventilating it's easy to miss stuff.
That's cuz you're not using DX11.1 - If you were you, would see magical flying unicorns.
And this is why Linux will always fail on the desktop. While users have to type shit like that it will never be adopted to the masses and Windows will continue to... oh never mind.
Say what? Only a Windows user would type that monstrosity out. ANYBODY ELSE (including Timothy) would script it. Hell, even a Windows admin would script it.
And I'd love to see what happens when you type that into Ubuntu. Go ahead. I dare you.
Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!