Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Not a surprise (Score 2) 303

HFT overcharges are fleecing the market to the tune of $50 million per day. Many billions per year. Adding no value, and tacking on % charges to each transaction. It's visible to those who trade, they can't fix it and the SEC won't touch it - justifies it, as this piece shows. That's how it's worse: we know it's going on and we're blessing it.

Comment Re:Nuclear power is too expensive (Score 1) 288

>>The problem is that large portions of the plant are radioactive...

Bingo, the fatal flaw of nuclear power. Those darn high-energy neutrons get randomly sprayed all over the place, and then large portions of everything around is radioactive. Haven't seen a design for a fission reactor that admits this, solves this, or even attempts to address it (hey, just "clean it up" when it's done - which means move all the radioactive stuff somewhere else and let it simmer in their back yard for 10's of thousands of years). Let's look then at renewables, shall we?

Comment Re:Frist pots (Score 1) 341

Not sure what you expect from your government, but here in the USA we have a range of options, from bupkis, to the triad (personal savings, worker pension, social security, all of which were paid into), to whatever you can scrounge. If we can get the government to pay for anything beyond health care at 65, it would be both lucky and meager.

Comment Beyond oversight? (Score 4, Interesting) 143

Seems like the NSA and CIA might be by nature beyond oversight. Their job includes assuming that the worst scenarios are possible, which then justifies any action to thwart them, including lying to their overseers in order to keep doing illegal things they think is necessary to prevent those worst possible scenarios. It's bureaucratic paranoia resulting in functional schizophrenia that makes sense within the hive mind but not within the greater public mind that employs them to keep us safe.

Comment Re:Ooh Scary! SLR (Score 1) 121

Speaking of "ground water", I believe the island is susceptible to high tides now and it (the island) is not getting any higher. A recent study (http://www.bcdc.ca.gov/planning/climate_change/TreasureIslandStudy.pdf) used 55" as a plausible/high level for sea level rise (SLR) by 2100. It rose 8 inches in the last 100 years, according to the same study. Plus the island is isolated as far as public transportation - perhaps people are looking to build in a place near SF that most people have trouble getting to?
Seems like a poor choice for a place to invest in the long term, if it's going to be underwater.

Slashdot Top Deals

Remember to say hello to your bank teller.

Working...