It looks like in 2005, it was $44 billion... so, presumably, between 2005 and the present, it doubled. According to one story, it was at $50 billion in 2007... meaning, from 2007 to present, it gained $30 billion? It seems hard to blame that on Bush and the Republicans, since that's only two years of Bush and no years of Republican SIC chairmanship.
It would have surprised me two years ago, but it doesn't now. One of the things about Obama that I think surprised everyone -- especially his base -- is that he turned out to actually be more authoritarian on the whole than Bush. It's like he has some kind of addiction to federal power and control. I know the Democrats are all about federal power more than state power, but they used to be the party that defended civil liberties. My, what a way we've come.
The only catch is that Steve gets to be gate keeper. . . I'm certainly glad that the Ubuntu approach is not like this.
Me too. I know I wouldn't want Steve Jobs deciding what Ubuntu applications I can and can't install.
Mod parent up.
And anyone who feels the same way should send a similar email. It's how we would get them to "give a sh*t."
Linux desktop is very much alive...on thinclients
However, what is up with the obvious story troll? Are the
"...what is up with the obvious story troll?"
This is what the author was referring to when he mentioned "...the fierce ideology of the open-source community...". Dismissing non-believers as heretics/trolls makes you an ideologue and renders the platform unattractive to regular users. Your natural reaction to this will be to dismiss regular users as not worthy of Linux but nobody wants to adopt a platform that gets them trashed by smelly, overbearing, slogan-yelling hippies.
Thanks asshole.
It's not a troll because it asserts that Linux is dead.
It's a troll because it asserts that Linux is dead ON
Come on, now.
For a second I thought the Slashdot headline was an Onion-esque headline, reporting the blindingly obvious and mundane as if it were news.
Because it's happened before -- it's how the whole Harry Potter moral panic got started. True story.
The original article: http://www.theonion.com/articles/harry-potter-books-spark-rise-in-satanism-among-ch,2413/http://www.theonion.com/articles/harry-potter-books-spark-rise-in-satanism-among-ch,2413/
And the snopes article: http://www.snopes.com/humor/iftrue/potter.asp
I hope Lucas also got a patent on a process for establishing "prior art" through the use of a non-functional prop, imagination, and delusions of grandeur.
I doubt it, but he may own the copyright on the phrase "delusions of grandeur."
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.