Based on numbers, the study shows SSDs to be more reliable than HDDs. The best data I have seen in that article is the following:
SSDs: 1.28--2.19% over 2 years
HDDs: >=5% over 2 years
The HDD data comes from: http://media.bestofmicro.com/2/N/289103/original/google_afrtemputilization_475.png The SSD data comes from the table on Page #6.
I don't think any of this data is particularly surprising, HDDs are mechanical so the curves for failure would not be linear. The most interesting part of the article for consideration with SSDs is that SMART is going to be near useless for them. Since most failures are random occurrences in electronics which SMART isn't good at detecting, we may need better technology for detecting SSD failures.
Wait isn't that what Gentoo was doing since well, forever?
Not really, Gentoo has native multilib support, not native multiarch support. And as I understand it, Debian's multiarch support is much more integrated than Gentoo's crossdev efforts at multiarch.
Because these magnetic particles are less mobile than drugs, there is a good chance they'll tend to stay put and only damage the tumour and local tissue, rather than harming the organism as a whole.
The solution to this is to use guided magnetic targeting. Basically, drugs are encapsulated in a magnetic nanoparticle and injected into the bloodstream relatively close to the cancer site. A magnetic field focusing on the cancer site attracts these particles and the drugs for the most part do not reach non-cancerous parts of the body
You mean a giant computer is going to rely on science instead of back whacking and cracking? Gasp!
Ex-Trapolate! Ex-Trapolate! The Daa-leks are supreme!
I'm fairly certain (I recall seeing these before?) the turret CAN run autonomously, however they are supposed to be supervised and do not engage unless an operator confirms it. The operator(s) have access to zooming cameras in the unit under both visible and infrared spectra.
This just means we need a tank squadron to come in and shoot the cameras up with paint. Problem solved.
Zoneminder works flawlessly here with multiple cameras, despite not being updated for a year.
As to its features, it is very good at detecting motion, even when the area of motion is small compared to the whole frame. And you can playback all activity so you can know for sure if anyone has been acting suspicious so as to keep your guard up. I'd definitely recommend it, but with other security, because 1) a camera can't see everything 2) a camera won't stop a breakin.
It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.