Try civilization (IV is prob better than V and you can buy that by 10€), or some another turn-based strategy game. Other game witch addicted me is minecraft. I would encourage you to give a try for either one of them or both.

Well, if it is something trivial use it. I mean 16 core's isn't that uncommon anymore, especially in servers but also desktops are catchin up that limit quite fast.

I have heard a lot of good about Apple's Magic Trackpad. It should have decent support for it in ubuntu maverick 10.10 too... (http://www.apple.com/magictrackpad/)

That were great blog post from him and i agree, we are better off without directx

Maybe i need to clarify. I know google is best search engine out there but i hope that there would rise new competitor even equal to google. And by abusing power i meant, i don't know if google is giving results over others that suit's its financial or political goals. Either way google has way too mutch power in internet.

Google might be abusing it's power but what we really do need is real choice.

We have basically bing and google and every other search site have licenced their engines.

I personally am not really happy about bing and there seems to be no true alternative for google. I welcome more competition into search engine market.

So basically i can get indian into deep trouble by sending someone of them encrypted email without providing them means to open it?

Lenovo did not invent PC, IBM did.
IBM just sold their desktop pc and laptop manufacturing parts to Chinese HW manufacturer.

Why would "traces" be in mac client then?

I can't see any logic to keep same script and even maybe common client base if meaning for linux is only for delicated server usage.

You are forgetting that valve's graphics engine is being ported to mac. Do i need to say what opengl support would mean for posibility of linux client?

And forgot to mention that even if we would take hit from new kind of diseases they carry why wouldn't it go another way around also?

You might be right that it's how its expected to be, but it doesn't mean that its best way of doing things. If you do things some way because it's how you have done it and your dad, grandad and so on.... ...things will never develop.

Microsoft has had open source code earlier also. But it's been licenced with bsd kind of licence. The problem is that if there are gpl-licenced code taken (doesn't need permission of project owners) microsoft has to give all changes they made to public. Gpl can also touch so depends what they've done with/to that they might also need to distribute more code of theirs. There is also organisation who's trying to track down and sue corporations violating OS licences (can't remember name), maybe they get some job to do.

Yea i thought same thing :)

I agree, but we need to remember that Microsoft's site is mutch larger than Apples. Small sites are always easier to keep in way that navigating between sites are easier and you always find site you are looking for.