Yes, a personal choice of the child, when he reaches an age where he is in a position to choose.
It's not for profit, because there's nothing worth lifting off the Moon.
How about bags of helium (he said, in a very high-pitched voice)?
Yes, indeed. I wish I still had some mod points for your post. Having recently seen what my ER invoice would have been if I had not had insurance, I entirely understand what you are saying. Although my health insurance did not cover most of the visit, it reduced the bill by a factor of five, merely by contractually obliging the hospital not to charge their hand-waving rates. Anyone without insurance would have been well and truly drained by the healthcare vampires.
However, the visit was NOT for an emergency circumcision, and I heartily encourage parents of male babies to leave their sons uncut.
I sympathize. Black electrical tape has restored my circadian rhythm.
California is not asking for the label to show the exact gene sequence (which would be directly analogous to the recipe or source code examples you refer to). California Proposition 37 would mandate a label indicating the presence of GM ingredients. To borrow your analogies, it would be like stating that your car has an engine computer (but not revealing the code) or indicating the sugar content of your can of Coke.
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer