From Wikipedia:

and

It sounds like the absorption will be a feature, not a bug. This will allow many more antennas in a city like situation. It won't be any good in rural areas, but I don't think it is meant for that.

Really?
So you agree with my statement as he was talking about the "small engine" ecoboost model.

If you have trouble hearing a Tesla at normal surface road speed, you should get your hearing checked. Below 30, you hear the tires, not the engine of many cars.

It sounds like you fell for the sound engineering than.

Speak for yourself, all the cables around my house are underground.

Aerial vs Buried depends on region. In rural, it is often aerial, buried costs 10x and when you need to run it much further per person, it makes sense. It can also be aerial in cities due to the difficulty/cost of running underground cables where there is no exposed dirt. In suburban America, the cables are often buried.

Up north, there is more pressure for buried cables than in the south due to the winter time storms, and in coastal regions, there is pressure due to hurricanes. It is a mixed bag :)

Do you expect intelligence out of people in congress? They do stupid things all the time.

However, /. editors intentionally lying in the title of a submission should be called out every time as it causes confusion on the subject. No one put forward a bill that climate change is a hoax.

If anyone wanted to do what you state, they should put forward their own bill. This is just a symbolic act that has no meaning. People who vote for Keystone XL don't give a damn about the anti science rider put on by the Democrats. Maybe this will allow more Dems to vote for the bill though as they can say they were affirming their belief in climate change.

If the debate had to be, why did the Democrats decide this had to be a rider to another bill, which by definition does not get debated?

That is just more wealth redistribution by the Demos to buy votes from the people they give the money to.

Maybe in the developing world. In the US I know CO2 emissions have dropped as natural gas has gotten cheaper, more nat gas power plants have been built, and more coal plants have been shut down.

Which would be why, according to the summary, the democrats feel they should legislate the truth of climate change instead of leaving it to the scientists. It helps to read the summary, it says the exact opposite as the title.

Funny thing is that the summary directly contradicts the title. The democrats are attaching riders to the Keystone XL bill that declare climate change caused by man a fact. This is just as bad, but done by the other side of the aisle.

That won't smell very good after a month, maybe even quicker with the heat produced by the computer. Neat hack though.

What is the limiting factor though? Should we build more medical facilities? Maybe offer more public money to fund more doctors? Clean up the medical patent system? Maybe loosen rules on "medical devices"?

Just trying to make the system work with what we have is silly, lets fix the problems instead.

The funny thing is that often those funky borders come from laws passed by Democrats to try and get minority districts in majority Republican states. It is quite rarely able to be attributed to actual gerrymandering like you are trying to indicate.