Yes, but he appears to be attacking a straw man with his nonsense about "demonic powers".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

It's a bit confusing to me, but it seems to make it sound plausible that the problem may be vulnerable to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

But his statement is based on the fact that many software sellers don't have a version of their software for anything else but Windows. In the cell phone space you are more likely to find something you want done in both iOS and Android. There are also more apps you can use in Android than in iOS because you are not limited to the Google app store.

But it's what cars crave!

I always find it strange when people say the autonomous cars should have the same problems detecting things than a human, mainly because autonomous cars can be fitted with sensors that detect light regions that pass through ice and rain which are undetectable to human eyes.

I don't understand what you think are weasel arguments.

You haven't seen any of the amateur Star Trek material easily found on YouTube, have you?

Star Trek: Of Gods and Men
Star Trek Continues
Star Trek: Intrepid
Starship Exeter
Star Trek: Unity
Star Trek: New Voyages

No, it means I'm not familiar with Call of Duty and the options it gives players. It seems it has a poor matchmaking system if it can't pair users of the same skill level that often.

Nowhere in my posts do I indicate the lack of need for societal norms and laws. I have merely indicated that the current societal norms and laws can be improved and the direction I think they should go to be improved,

http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Where an Anonymous Coward says that he is a "creative professional" and that whoever arrives at stuff that "creative professionals" arrive at should own it forever and it's hard work.

I suggest he find easier work and let people who find that sort of thing easy do their thing.
http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Claim by fyngyrz that people infringe copyright because the abstraction that someone actually put some valuable time into the work is too abstract for them to grasp. Also, individuals violating copyright on a "I copied this work to use for myself" level is antisocial

I point out that people put "valuable time" into lots of things. Doesn't mean they should get paid for it. And with people throwing around concepts like "the universe creates itself", I'm not sure anyone has a workable meaningful definition of what create or design actually means.

Fyngyrz claims that the whole copyright debacle is the most trivial of ethical mazes.

Bzipitidoo says " I disagree that copying is antisocial. Copying is a natural right, and has a long history. It is only our current customs that push the idea that copying is harmful, and attempt to regulate it and restrict it by fiat." ... Might as well argue that children should not receive the fruits of knowledge that our civilizations have produced over the millennia, without paying for the "privilege".

I've kind of lost interest in mining previous discussion I participated in, but there's more in those links that make for interesting reading.

What does he mean when he says 'verse'?

No I don't want an answer from someone who: can speak for everyone and has polled a "representative sample". I want you to stop talking as if you had that information.

As for "whatever that is", I typed poll representative sample into Bing and it suggested the search what is representative sample in a poll.
http://www.investopedia.com/te... is first in the results.

As for the rest of your post, it makes no sense.