No more than I have a hard time taking something called "Gingerbread" seriously.

So there are doing to same thing Apple has been doing for years with LLVM. Which is why LLVM is part of xcode.

Way to innovate Gnome.

Double tap.

For exactly this reason

The only 2 reasons I can really think of are Redhat support (which, at the place were I work, barely gets used. In fact I believe we are migrating to CentOS because we can't justify the cost of support with how often we use it), and the release schedule, because it seems like CentOS is run by the seat of their pants, and they'll release when they feel like it.

In America, flats are a style of shoes that woman wear, and "apartment-mate" doesn't roll off the tongue like "flat-mate" or "room-mate".

Well he got married in 1991 and he had no Apple stock from the time he got fired to the time of Apple's acquisition of/merger with NeXT in 1997. And he probably has all his Apple and Disney stock in a holding company like how Bill Gate has Cascade Investments LLC.

Unless they renegotiate the security deal at the last moment. Politicians the world over seemed to like to make last minute deals so that both sides can claim victory.

Off the top of my head: Between the 3 people that live here (girlfriend, apartment mate, and I), and the roommates girlfriend who is frequently over, there are up to: 3 Androids, 1 Blackberry, 4 laptops, a chromebook, a media center, and home file/media server. This doesn't include assorted other devices belonging to friends who visit regularly. There is actually enough traffic that I am considering putting in a second access point to lesson the peak loads.

Well, California is a community property state, so his wife. Since she isn't inheriting it (she already co-owned it), she doesn't have to pay estate taxes (I think).

Says the AC posting on a site written in perl.

Because clearly what we need is _yet another_ way to develop web applications.

*And it could be the case that the birds they used didn't evolve from t-rex, but rather some other (possibly completely unrelated) species of dinosaur, which would skew the results Note to self: don't post when tired.

I understand the they used birds because of the evolutionary history, and crocs due to the age of their species and reptilian nature, but I doubt using the human body as a reference to the bodies of our millions of years old relatives would give a clear picture, and the same goes for this experiment. And it could be the case that the birds they used didn't evolve from t-rex, but rather some other (possibly completely unrelated) species of bird, which would skew the results. If I had to guess, I'd say that 30% is in the margin of error for this kind of work.