Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Abject brand mismanagement (Score 1) 352

Yeah, but very basic functionality like actually being able to type your name if you happen to be Japanese requires you to install the OS, then get a combination of strangely-named packages like ibus, im-chooser, anthy, some font packages, etc. and then screw around getting it configured. None of this is documented clearly. Windows or OSX lets you choose a language from a list at install time. Which do you think is easier?

Device drivers are another issue. Linux is simpler if there's a driver in the kernel tree and it works adequately. If there isn't, then it's far more trouble than Windows to find a driver and get it to work. Also, drivers often lack functionality on Linux. For example the Wacom tablet drivers aren't adequately configurable. There are some options in obscure text files that you need root to edit, but there's no simple way to switch mapping on-the-fly or reconfigure your buttons per application. This is all dead easy on OSX or Windows.

Linux may be easier for you, but there are far more use cases than "person with no exotic hardware speaking a language using Latin script".

Comment Re:Abject brand mismanagement (Score 1) 352

It definitely doesn't just work if you need Japanese language support. You need to find the necessary packages, install them, configure ibus... Seriously it's a nightmare. On Windows or OSX you just choose it from the dropdown during installation. Every time I do a distro upgrade I have to go through this stupid pain-in-the-arse procedure again, trying to work out exactly which packages I need with no help from any documentation.

Comment Re:Fairly often, but nothing serious: (Score 1) 231

You know, I liked the Amiga. But it was a machine of such contradictions. It had preemptive multitasking, but no isolated application heaps. So if an app didn't clean up properly, memory leaked not just until you closed the app, but until the machine restarted. And if an app crashed, all its allocated memory leaked until you restarted. Even the Mac had isolated application heaps from day one. As cool as the graphics system was, it just about impossible to deliver a much-needed new generation without breaking compatibility with everything. They really painted themselves into a corner there. Even things like the filesystem that made DMA read/write impractical. It had so much baggage to work around right from the start.

Comment Re:Fairly often, but nothing serious: (Score 1) 231

Nah, seriously, rampant piracy on the Amiga drove developers away and killed the platform. The IBM PC had businesses paying for site licesnses, which more than made up for widespread piracy by home users. Apple had their cult following who were paying for the big-name Adobe, Aldus and Macromedia packages, andfor some reason actually paying money for shareware as well. But there was just no money in developing for Amiga because no-one ever paid for software.

Comment Re:Why? Nobody uses NFC payments (Score 1) 187

There's an offline mode that's available in Europe where the card verifies the PIN entered on the terminal. This mode has been shown to be vulnerable to compromised hardware as response for a valid PIN is predictable. The cards in Australia are incapable of verifying the PIN at all - you can set or change your PIN for many cards using an online service without the card present.

Comment Re:NGH (Score 1) 187

Coin is going to be dead in the water as soon as US requires chip cards. The whole point of chip cards is that the key never leaves the chip and it can't be copied. They talk about supporting it in the future but can't elaborate on a plan, as they don't have one. They also have blatant misinformation about "chip and sign" on their site. "Chip and sign" uses the ICC chip to verify card presence, but you sign the receipt rather than entering a PIN. The Coin people claim you still use the magnetic strip, but that just plain isn't true.

Comment Re:What else can they do? (Score 1) 191

The early prototype fast neutron reactors in the UK had issues with handling of the coolants, and are proving very expensive to decommission. Irradiated light metals coating the insides of pipes are difficult to deal with apparently. It's probably nothing that couldn't be solved with additional R&D, but how long before it actually pays off? The UK gave up on it before getting to a viable level.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne

Working...