Sure, Bennett.

You do realize we know it's you when you use AC to defend yourself, right?

He made his point. Whine on your own blog.

And if he wants to ramble on about it he can get a blog.

It's not. It's only a dependency to run X as non-root.

And it will run on Wayland using XWayland.

What does any of that have to do with my post? I was simply asking you how many users there were of XQuartz since you were implying it was some large number.

And how many users is that?

An Atom is not ARM. How exactly does that have any relevance to their question?

Huh? NetBSD was a 386BSD fork as well.

ARM is a Tier 2 architecture for FreeBSD so I wouldn't get my hopes up too far, but you might get lucky.

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_...

Welfare hasn't existed since the mid 90s. Bill Clinton signed the law that abolished it. Secondly, unemployment doesn't last forever. So even if people were doing that, which no one has proved more than a small minority is doing, it's not like they could live on it for more than a year or so.

Amazing to see that people are still falling for Reagan's "welfare queen" fantasy.

You don't read much of Stan Lee's works then I presume? His works have always been about political and social issues.

Right, because slapping big tits on a female character to appeal to creepy nerds is the height of enlightenment and anti-misogyny.

Sure, it would be if she wasn't made to have the same ridiculous and unrealistic body proportions that no woman can live up to. Same with not having your female characters just be simply riding the coattails of a popular male character. If they really believed the nonsense they are spewing they would have created an original character without ridiculous things like the huge tits. As it is, this is just comics sexism disguised as "empowerment".

And apparently not strong enough to not need a huge rack to sell issues.