That's funny, I didn't realize that programs such as Autocad, Autodesk Sketchbook, Pixelmator, Adobe Lightroom, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Pinnacle Studio, etc. were for consuming content. They seem to be for creating content to me. That isn't even scratching the surface of all the content creation apps that exist for iOS.

No, it's a grammar issue. Breath is a noun. So "to breath" is grammatically incorrect.

Exactly. This guy lives in some sort of bizarro world Rubyist bubble. Sure, there is probably some guy's toy project to use Ruby in some sort of faux embedded environment, but that hardly matches what is done by the actual people writing the software.

Maybe in less than 1% of cases. All the rest of the time, the only one using the IP address is the person who pays for the internet access.

It's only reasonable if you think shoving your head in the sand gives you reasonably anonymity.

Their product was only "better" because their competitors at the time only had crap products. Not to mention that smartphones were a tiny niche product during the heyday of the BlackBerry. The global sales of smartphones during that time was about 1/20th of what they are now. It's easy to be the biggest fish when the pond is small.

There are plenty of better languages to learn over Ruby if people need to learn the "basics of the industry". Ruby is only marginally more popular than moribund languages like Delphi.

Ruby needs all the help it can get. 19 years later and it's only marginally more popular than Delphi. And that language has been moribund for around a decade.

I've done C# programming for 6 years and have never had any issues finding documentation and examples from MSDN. Do you have a specific example of what you have been unable to find documentation on?

But what are you going to offer to sweeten the deal?

The sad part is the submission had it spelled correctly. "Creato" was all timothy.

The "Name 2" was to "That's not to mention that a lot of people do like Gnome3, but those who don't tend to not acknowledge that they exist." It wasn't saying to Name 2 other DEs.

There is no such thing as "AppleGL". There is AppKit which contains classes to set up the OpenGL contexts and surfaces and GLKit for constructing textures, etc.

And how exactly are you going to have more sway than a couple of multi-billion dollar conglomerates?

Unless who is developing on the tablet? And how is one going to actually develop on the tablet? It's basically a fixed function device that only runs a single application. Furthermore, the act of "developing on the target tablet" does not fall under GNOME's mark's goods and services.