Chic-Fil-A was donating money to organizations opposed to marriage equality
NEWSPEAK ALERT!
No, Dan Cathy donated money to organizations that worked against redefining marriage to fit a certain political agenda.
LK
You and the parent both fail to realise that the laws trump your religions. If their is a conflict between the 2 the law always takes precedent. Claiming your invisible sky-daddy wants or doesn't want something is irrelevant.
You're just so full of wrong here.
First, you mean precedence, not precedent.
Second, the SCOTUS just saw it my way.
So, you can go suck a bag full of dicks.
LK
how is the poster a moron?
I can't say for certain how he or she became a moron but the idiocy he or she is displaying is how I know that he or she is a moron.
Five years ago you would never think a corporation had a right to unlimited political spending in the name of the right of free speech of a corporation.
I argued that exact position before McCain-Feingold became law. If each of the people who own a corporation has the right to free speech, it's unthinkable that when they work together they somehow lose that right.
Last year you would not have thought Hobby Lobby could prevent it's employees from getting their Federally guaranteed earned health benefits in the name of a corporation's religious inclination.
1. No one is prevented from getting anything. Every Hobby Lobby employee who can get a doctor to prescribe birth control pills can still get them. Hobby Lobby just won't be forced to pay for it.
2. Yes, I not only thought but I hoped that would be the case when the issue was decided by the SCOTUS.
It really is just a few months at this rate before they vote.
Yeah, I see why you posted anonymously. If you had used your name, in a year, I would have waited to see you post and then replied to remind you what a fucking moron you are.
It's not going to happen. Ever.
What's to stop it?
The fact that to be able to have the right to vote, one must be a citizen and in order to be a citizen one must be a human being.
LK
Pregnancy: it takes two to happen, but it's always the woman's fault.
And the resultant expense is always the man's responsibility.
LK
Right, because running a corporation is a religious practice. Give us this day our daily board meeting.
Every part of your day can be a religious practice.
For some people, running their business in accordance with their faith is a part of their religious practices.
LK
Superstition trumps health care for women.
Stop with the butthurt.
Pay for your own Plan B. This decision doesn't take that away.
LK
Chick-fil-A were attacked because they were openly bigoted.
Were there any documented cases of Chic-Fil-A refusing to serve someone because they were gay? Refusing to hire someone because they were gay? Attacking someone because they were gay?
LK
No, you fucking moron.
Corporations are "persons" not "people" and moreover, only "Citizens" can vote. Corporations are not now, have never been and shall never be "citizens".
LK
I wonder when the big man at 1600 Pennsylvania is going to fix this gender disparity?
Shut your oppressive mouth. Cock-man! Despoiler!
Everyone knows that it's only discrimination to treat people differently when women aren't happy with the disparity.
LK
put their religion before the constitution. Shocking.
I guess you missed that part about "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
LK
+1 Fucking Right!
Not my "meme." I rarely, if ever, refer to it.
But, it's true. Capitalism relies on private control and a free, competitive market. Crony capitalism is government control and a resulting non-free market by explicitly decreasing competition.
I mean, sure, you can call it whatever you want to, but when I say "capitalism works" and someone says "crony capitalism is proof it doesn't," that's just stupid, because crony capitalism flatly violates some of the primary tenets of capitalism.
It was a different fork of this thread.
So you admit you lied.
Crony capitalism
False, but telling that you think such a stupid thing. To you, there's no difference between freedom, and not-freedom. It's just two different options, neither better than the other.
It is also noted that you have still failed to produce an example of a federal regulation that actually impedes profitability of health insurance companies.
a. I never saw you ask that. It might've been in the comment I replied to, and I didn't see it, because after your massive whopper about what you want people to think crony capitalism is, I stopped reading.
b. Why would I produce an example of something I never asserted? Once again: holy shit, you're retarded.
For example, does state law say you cannot participate in GOP runoff if you participated in Dem primary?
I think that's the case McDaniel is making, and I haven't heard it refuted.
I haven't seen the case strongly made. If you have a link, I'd be obliged. Stories I saw all handwaved at it.
You don't seem to understand that in modern America, "having rules and enforcing them" == "voter suppression".
But they are Republicans. Voter suppression is expected. It's OK.
Check the mirror and see if you don't notice a big ol' raaaaacist in there, or something.
Only because I see YOU STANDING BEHIND ME. What the fuck, man?!?
Sorry, no. I have these things called pride and integrity.
This restaurant was advertising breakfast any time. So I ordered french toast in the renaissance. - Steven Wright, comedian
