Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:1.2 what? (Score 4, Funny) 199

1.2 pedobytes.

According to the article, they seized more than 4 times more child porn than the Library of Congress has.

But unlike past investigations into the distribution of child porn, which typically involve targeting suspects individually, police have instead seized over 1.2 petabytes of data—more than four times the amount of data in the US Library of Congress

I'm kind of surprised that all congress could only manage to accumulate 300TB of child porn.

Comment How big is it? (Score 1) 93

The summary says "Reads and large writes run at about the same speed as on a conventional drive, and at $280 it costs less than a pair of decent 4TB drives", one of the 7 links in the summary mentions a 5TB model. 5TB for the price of two 4TB drives doesn't sound that great.

Comment Stingray detector? (Score 4, Interesting) 194

So I wonder if all of this excess interference means that a Stingray detector could be created? Privacy minded volunteers could run a SDR that looks for an increase in the noise floor or other indications that a Stingray is in use, and update a central repository for a real-time map of everywhere a Stingray is in use.

If Law Enforcement won't reveal when they are using it, maybe citizens can find out out their own.

Comment Re:Wasteful? (Score 1) 95

Well, to quote the summary: "Ikea's introduction of wireless charging functionality on some of its new furniture heats up the battle for a global wireless charging standard"

Although you can get up into the 80% range (short distance between emitter and receiver, good axial alignment, well-tuned resonance frequencies, and proper shielding), you are more likely to be in the 50-75% efficiency range. That's for the inductive portion; there is also a loss in converting the 120/220V power from the wall. [I speak from professional experience developing a Qi-charged medical device. It was a good solution for the problem, as it allowed the case to be fully sealed, but turned me off the idea of using it for everything that needs charging.] For 5-10 W of actual charge power in the device, your losses from grid to device will be close to that amount This is about as bad as the 50-60 Hz wall wart transformers that we have recently gotten away from.

My phone battery has around 8 watt-hours of capacity. Round it up to 10 watt-hours, and that's around 3.6KWh/year to charge my phone every day, so even if I'm wasting another 3.6KWh/year, that's only costing me around 50 cents/year of electricity, which is well worth the convenience of just putting my phone on the side table when I go to bed and not having to fumble with wires in the dark to connect it to a charger.

Comment Re:Obligatory (Score 1) 95

Can anyone explain to me the appeal of xkcd comics? A lot of people think they're great, but I don't see why.

The joke is never funny if someone has to explain it to you, you'll just have to continue going through life wondering why people find it funny. And some people will never understand what *you* think is funny.

Comment Re:Uninsightful (Score 1) 253

A "maser" attack??
I do not think that work means what you think it means.
While you are looking up "maser" look up "Dunning -Kruger" as well.
The opposite of "insightful" :(

I looked up maser as you suggested, and one of the uses of a maser is: Masers are being used by a few countries as directed-energy weapons. So what do you think "maser" means? Oh wait, I get it, you are the one suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect. Clever.

Comment Re:this is one more reason (Score 3, Insightful) 136

Nobody is stopping people in the US from doing business with mega. Send an international money order. People do it all the time. And if you trust them so much, you can always send cash.

It's not so much trust in the business on the other end that keeps me from sending cash through the mail, it's all the people in the middle that are handling the cash-filled mail. The business has a huge incentive to not rip off their customers since a customer that doesn't get what he paid for will soon be an ex-customer.

If postal workers knew that every envelope addressed to Mega had cash in it, they'd be a huge theft target.

Comment Re:Just a distraction from the real fail... (Score 1) 47

Because they think it was a crime of opportunity, which sounds like a reasonable supposition -- the hacker stumbled across the key in Github, then either gave (or sold) the key to someone else to do the hack, or did the hack himself. Clearly he wouldn't have downloaded the data using his own IP address, but it's entirely possible that when he found the key on Github, he was using a traceable IP.

There could be hundreds of legitimate accesses of that file. If the hacker was indeed using a hidden IP address to access the database, but his real IP to download the gist, how are Uber going to determine that from all the other legitimate accesses? If the hacker gave away or sold that information, there is going to be no way for Uber to determine a link at all. This just seems like a fishing expedition to hide the real fail.

Or there could be 2 accesses of that file, depending on how long they left it up there. Right now, only Github knows how many people accessed it.

By admitting that one of their developers leaked the key himself on Github, it seems a little late for them to claim that they have no responsibility for the breach.

Ahh... but the thing is that Uber haven't admitted to anything like that. By serving a subpoena against GitHub, it is clear that is what has happened, but nowhere have I seen Uber actually admit this. If Uber were actually to admit this, it would likely open them up to lawsuits from their affected drivers.

They provided the exact Gist URL that had the information, if the drivers want to sue, they can subpoena Github themselves.

Comment Re:Just a distraction from the real fail... (Score 5, Insightful) 47

Any hacker with any decent opsec would not be showing their actual IP address. The subpoena request is just smoke and mirrors to hide Uber's own security fail. Even if GitHub were to hand over the data, they would likely find nothing useful. Uber know that GitHub will not hand over that data without a fight. I am willing to bet that Uber are going to start claiming that the hack isn't their fault because GitHub won't hand over the data. If Uber already know the public IP of the hacker, why do they need the info from GitHub to proceed? Meanwhile the actual security fail of Uber making their database access info publicly accessible gets overlooked.

Because they think it was a crime of opportunity, which sounds like a reasonable supposition -- the hacker stumbled across the key in Github, then either gave (or sold) the key to someone else to do the hack, or did the hack himself. Clearly he wouldn't have downloaded the data using his own IP address, but it's entirely possible that when he found the key on Github, he was using a traceable IP.

By admitting that one of their developers leaked the key himself on Github, it seems a little late for them to claim that they have no responsibility for the breach.

Comment Re:Thieves looking to steal metal? lolwut? (Score 1) 133

That doesn't even make sense. There have got to be a bunch of easier ways to steal metal than going out of your way to find the exposed pipe that just happens to contain out a bunch of important fibre.

These police are complete fucking idiots if they think this was the motive. It's quite obvious the objective wasn't theft, it was just to cause damage.

How do you know if the conduit contains copper wire or fiber until you cut it open?

Comment Re:Bloatware?! (Score 1) 210

I don't understand why people call it "bloatware". This helpful software does many useful things for the user. It essentially subsidizes your $1000 computer into a more affordable $500 or so machine!

The manufacturer gets money for the installation, and you get helpful software that reduces your costs!

What would people do without search aggregators, browser toolbars, download accelerators, etc?

Maybe people should pay the full cost of the software that comes on their machines. Suddenly your "bargain" $350 "bloats" up to a $700. How about paying the full cost for Windows? How about paying the full cost for say hotmail access?

Software isn't , and shouldn't always be "free".

There should be an option for a "bloat" free computer, with the user paying the full cost for software.

Do you have a reference for that? I'd be surprised if all of the bloatware ads up to a $500 payment to Lenovo, I'd be surprised if it was even $50.

If software makers were willing to pay Lenovo up to $500 to pre-install this software, why aren't they making it available to consumers directly? I'm sure lots of people would be happy to install Superfish-like software if they were paid just $100 for it.

Comment Re:Then why live on mars? (Score 2) 135

It's only slightly better than living in a giant spinning space station... or in a bomb shelter right here.

Be that as it may, humans can tolerate such conditions and there are plenty of volunteers -- look how many people survive for decades in prison, even harsh prisons outside of the USA where they may literally never leave their cell.

Anything you can do on mars, robots can do better. already.

Then why did it take a big team of human workers to build my house? Surely a robot can hammer a nail into a piece of wood?

Why do we send human firefighters into a burning building? Why are we risking human lives for this if robots can do it better?

Why does an industrial plant call in a human technician to repair their broken robots, why don't they just call in a robot to fix the robot?

Special purpose science robots can do a lot, but there is still no robot that's as versatile as a human. The mars rover is a great example of a robot performing great science (that's far exceeded expectations), but try asking it to step over a 2 foot high wall to reach an interesting object, or asking it to excavate a 3 foot deep hole to see if someone buried an obelisk there.

Comment Re:PLIP (Score 1) 466

LapLink lets you use the parallel port without having to configure TCP/IP stuff. It's raw bytes, more like a really fast null modem cable.

But why bother getting the right cables (I have some, easy to DIY, but you can't buy them off-the-shelf anymore) and software (some piracy required I imagine). Instead you can use RS232 at 115.2kbps. Google did the arithmetic and unit conversion for me:

160 Megabytes) / (1125 (bytes / second)) = 1.64609053 days

Zmodem is pretty slow, but ZedZap/8K-Zmodem is pretty quick and easy to find software that supports it for DOS, Win9x and Linux. If you do not require error detection and flow control, then Xmodem is fast. (recommend you use a null modem cable with flow control RTS/CTS wired, this is almost always wired correctly with off-the-shelf cables). Don't need a 16550 UART for this to work, an 8250 is adequate if you have flow control enabled.

I'd highly recommend you send ZIP files over your link rather than uncompressed data. If you have enough disk space free, you can use pkzip's multivolume support and archive the entire disk into several managable files. (rar's is even easier to use than pkzip's)

You're off by a factor of 10, 115kbs is around 11500 bytes/second. Even if his serial port can only handle 56kbs, he could transfer the data in less than 10 hours.

Xmodem does do simple error checking with a single byte checksum on every packet (admittedly inferior to zmodem's crc32). Though for anything important, he should be able to find an md5 or even sha1 hash program that'll run on his system.

Comment Re:Cash is so much better. (Score 4, Informative) 186

Your ordering is wrong.

The correct ordering is:

1) Cash: 15 seconds or less
2) Credit/debit card: 45 seconds or more
3) Smart phone: 1 minute or more
4) Checks: 2 minutes or more

What kind of lame POS system does your coffee shop have? When I go to Starbucks or Peets, it takes me the same amount of time to hand over my card as it does to hand over cash, the difference being that it literally takes them only a second to swipe it, and by they time they hand it back to me, the transaction has already been approved, no signature required.

I don't see how cash could possibly be faster unless I hand them exact change, but even then they still have to count the bills and put them in the drawer, so even if *my* transaction is faster, the next patron has to wait.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Here's something to think about: How come you never see a headline like `Psychic Wins Lottery.'" -- Comedian Jay Leno

Working...