Comment Celebrity Jeopardy answer (Score 2) 164
How did I spend Mother's Day this year? With your mother, Alex!
How did I spend Mother's Day this year? With your mother, Alex!
Because even if Affirmative Action is their "policy" that doesn't necessarily mean that every implementation is in compliance with the law.
LK
THIS!
I feel the exact same way. I was vaccinated. I had my children vaccinated.
I am completely opposed to the idea that the government can compel anyone to inject their child with anything as a preventative measure.
LK
As a male, white middle-aged STEM researcher: Yes, there is pervasive, often painfully (and legally prosecutable) obvious sexism in science. And while I can imagine that many fields are even worse, that doesn't put science off the hook.
You're about to be refuted by someone who not only despises William Jefferson Clinton but was also paying close attention during the the time of impeachment.
The other thing is that it was not a Material Matter and it was not a criminal case. Having sex or not with Monica Lewinsky had beans to do with whether he forced himself on Jennifer Flowers (her own sister said she was trying to climb that pole for months).
Bill Clinton was deposed in a suit about his having allegedly sexually harassed Paula Jones, not Ginnifer Flowers.
Bill Clinton signed the Violence Against Women Act into law, a law that was principally written by Joe Biden(which is a part of why he was chosen to be Obama's VP over Hillary Clinton) that permitted the exploration of a defendant's sexual history during a sexual harassment lawsuit.
Wonderful irony right?
It's certainly materiel if he had engaged in a pattern of seeking oral sex from subordinates when he was accused of requesting oral sex from a subordinate.
He was impeached, but he did not perjure himself.
If that's the case, why did he work out a plea deal to only be denied his license to practice law for 10 years?
He committed perjury. His supporters in the Senate and the broadcast media did their best to make it about his infidelity.
During a civil lawsuit, one had three choices. 1. Tell the truth. 2. Lie. 3. Refuse to answer.
Bill Clinton chose the one of those three options that was illegal. He was rightfully impeached and he was acquitted for political concerns, not for legal ones.
LK
Agreed - something like this technology would allow passengers to choose whether or not to see outside:
http://www.glass-apps.com/prod...
I'll stack my degrees up against yours any time you find the bravery to not hide behind anonymity.
LK
Women who are just dying to latch onto someone and get that monthly payment going. I am not much too look at externally, so when a 34 year old chic wants me to date her someone is wrong.
I'm a few years younger and I have found that now that I have a good career, good income and secure finances, I get a lot more attention from the female of our species.
I'm not married but I am in a relationship with the mother of my children. She was with me when I was working my way through college and living in my grandfather's spare bedroom so I know that she's here for me and not what I have.
I'd be extremely cautious about who I'd date if I were on the scene again.
LK
There are certain feminizing elements in our society who are trying to pathologize maleness.
Boys are more likely to be diagnosed with psychological issues and medicated for doing the kinds of things that little boys just do.
We have things like California's "yes means yes" law that criminalizes what's considered normal sexuality in the rest of the country.
Some guys are just checking out "Fuck this! I'll be over here with my video games and these porn chicks who won't make me just through a bunch of stupid hoops". They never planned to have children anyway so what's the point?
LK
You're naive.
At an extreme, put a clause in having the OS actively deny access to a non-DRM-ed 3D printer, and no operating system without this capability can be specced for government work.
That's the whole fucking point of F/LOSS operating systems. This kind of nonsense can just be removed.
What next? Another law criminalizing Operating Systems that lack this capability? How will you enforce that? How will you detect them?
Cody Wilson's objective is to illustrate the idiocy of people who think that utopia is "just" a few laws away.
You don't like what he's doing. That's fine, you don't have to but you can't stop it either.
LK
If his losses are repaid, then he has justice.
What he seeks is retribution.
There is a difference.
LK
Multiple IPs was one solution, but the other was much simpler.
The real address of the computer was its MAC, the prefix simply said how to get there. In the event of a failover, the client's computer would be notified the old prefix was now transitory and a new prefix was to be used for new connections.
At the last common router, the router would simply swap the transitory prefix for the new prefix. The packet would then go by the new path.
The server would multi-home for all prefixes it was assigned.
At both ends, the stack would handle all the detail, the applications never needed to know a thing. That's why nobody cared much about remembering IP addresses, because those weren't important except to the stack. You remembered the name and the address took care of itself.
One of the benefits was that this worked when switching ISPs. If you changed your provider, you could do so with no loss of connections and no loss of packets.
But the same was true of clients, as well. You could start a telnet session at home, move to a cyber cafe and finish up in a pub, all without breaking the connection, even if all three locations had different ISPs.
This would be great for students or staff at a university. And for the university. You don't need the network to be flat, you can remain on your Internet video session as your laptop leaps from access point to access point.
Google Answers.
Google Shopping.
Goog-411.
Google Buzz.
Google Wave.
Google Video.
iGoogle.
I don't trust Google to keep it around once it's no longer in Google's best interests to do so and since social networking isn't Google's focus or primary source of revenue, I can't trust that.
It's not that I begrudge them the decision to do what's in their own best interests but I have that same decision to make and Google+ doesn't align with them.
LK
No condescending comments from Barack Obama about how the 80s called and wants their foreign policy back?
LK
I suspect they could have saved themselves a lot of coding by simply randomly linking to real startup web sites. It'd look no less ridiculous.
HOLY MACRO!