Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft

Submission + - Microsoft changes settings... and says you did (computerworld.com)

Geoffrey.landis writes: "According to ComputerWorld, MIcrosoft's OneCare software update changes the Automatic Updates settings in Windows XP and Vista, without notice (or approval), setting the update to "fully automatic update".

What's more disturbing about this, though, is that not only did Microsoft deny that AU settings were ever changed without user consent, it said that the changed settings were undoubtably due to "absent-minded users making modifications and then forgetting that they had."

Apparently they change your settings... and then say you did it."

Privacy

Submission + - Warantless Wiretap act sought to be made permanent

UniversalVM writes: The Bush Administration is making efforts to ensure that the Companies and Telecom providers that co-operated with the government to enable the warantless wiretap programme, most notably AT&T, will face no prosecution for their role. It has sought to make permanent the interim changes to the FISA law that were rushed thru before the congressional recess. One of the sections under the amended FISA would provide complete and retroactive immunity to any company that took part or helped in the wiretapping. The new FISA act would enable the warantless wiretapping of all communication where at least one party was outside the US. It would also allow any TRAFFIC (Cell phone, e-mail, data packets) to be monitored as long the govt. "reasonably believed the parties to be outside the United States". Other nuggets from the congress hearings now in progress:
"But when pressed by House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) and other Democrats to estimate how many Americans who weren't necessarily "targets" have had their communications scooped up through the government's surveillance efforts, McConnell couldn't say. ""I don't have the exact number," McConnell replied, adding, It is a very small number considering that there are billions of transactions everyday." The clearest indicator that the act is overreaching and almost certainly prone to abuse — its' name. It is called the "Protect America Act". This is a wake-up call to users the worldover to use encryption and leave it turned on by default. Should any part of your internet communication pass thru the US, it will now be almost certainly intercepted and stored indefinately.
Music

Submission + - Last.Fm goes legal

tryfan writes: "Seems that CBS's buyout of Last.Fm has resulted in someting rather spectacular: yesterday a deal was announced that will make the Sony BMG's music catalogue legally available to Last.Fm listeners:

"Last.fm strikes Sony music deal
Last.fm connects users who share the same music tastes
Fans of the Foo fighters, Kings of Leon or Natasha Bedingfield will soon be able to listen to their music through the social music site Last.fm. The service, bought in May for $280m (£140m) by CBS Corporation, has signed a deal with the Sony BMG record label. The partnership will give the web 2.0 service's 20 million users access to the entire Sony catalogue of music.""
Privacy

Submission + - Privacy and the "Nothing to Hide" Argument 1

privacyprof writes: One of the most common responses of those unconcerned about government surveillance or privacy invasions is "I've got nothing to hide." According to the "nothing to hide" argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The "nothing to hide" argument is quite prevalent. Is there a way to respond to the "nothing to hide" argument that would really register with people in the general public? In a short essay, "I've Got Nothing to Hide" and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy, Professor Daniel Solove takes on the "nothing to hide" argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
Television

Submission + - 'Stealth advertising' infiltrating TV news (pressesc.com)

amigoro writes: "Over 90 per cent of newscasts in the US contained stealth advertising. Stealth advertising is showing advertisements outside regular commercial blocks cloaked as news. What's disturbing about this trend of "stealth advertising" is that viewers seldom are aware of potential slants in coverage because the connection of a story to an advertiser rarely is disclosed."
United States

Submission + - EFF reports more USA PATRIOT act abuse

A Name Similar to Di writes: From the EFF website:

In the wake of the inspector general's report, EFF filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking fundamental information about the FBI's misuse of the NSL authority, and a federal judge recently ordered the Bureau to release information responsive to EFF's request on a rolling basis.

On Friday, July 6, the FBI made its first disclosure of 1,138 pages of documents, all of which you can view here. (Please keep in mind that this is the first of many sets of documents we'll be receiving, so this material does not present a complete picture.) Here's what we've spotted that we think is most interesting so far.
Software

Submission + - Problems with the "Paperless Voting" bill (obsidianrook.com)

doom writes: "Are you excited to hear that Congress is going to vote on a bill to ban paperless voting? Well I was, and Move On clearly is, but if there are election reform advocates that tell a different story: Bev Harris: Is a flawed bill better than no bill?: "the Holt Bill provides for a paper trail (toilet paper roll-style records affixed to DRE voting machines) in 2008, requires more durable ballots in 2010, and requires a complex set of audits. It also cements and further empowers a concentration of power over elections under the White House, gives explicit federal sanction to trade secrets in vote counting, mandates an expensive 'text conversion' device that does not yet exist which is not fully funded, and removes 'safe harbor' for states in a way that opens them up to unlimited, expensive, and destabilizing litigation. " Steve Freeman: Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory "Today, the Holt bill faces a 'fast track' vote in Congress. Essentially this means an up or down vote on a terrible bill, rather than an opportunity to speak in the nation's most important forum about what may well be the greatest threat to democracy in the history of the republic.""
Hardware Hacking

Submission + - Order your OpenMoko open mobile phone

kliese writes: You can now order your OpenMoko open mobile phone. "OpenMoko is a GNU / Linux based open software development platform. Developers have full access to OpenMoko source and they can tailor their implementations to underlying hardware platforms."

According to a mass mailing received today, "Today is the day that we've all been waiting for: We can finally take your order for the world's first freed phone."

http://www.openmoko.com
Education

Submission + - University of Washington to identify infringers

tor528 writes: "I received the following letter from the Vice Provost for Student Life at my school:

Dear Student:

        I am writing to inform you of a development that could become a serious issue
for some of our students — the law governing downloading and sharing of music and
video from the internet. Under copyright law, it is illegal to download or share
copyrighted materials such as music or movies without the permission of the
copyright owner. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in recent
years has taken an aggressive approach to stopping this illegal downloading and
file sharing. This has put many students at the nation's colleges and
universities at some legal risk. I write first to caution you against illegally
downloading or sharing files. Your actions when you do so are traceable and
could result in a significant financial penalty to you. Second, I want to inform
you about a new process the RIAA has initiated and the University's role in this
process.

        The RIAA is now sending colleges and universities a letter for each instance
they find of a student illegally downloading material from the internet and
requesting the university to identify the individual student and forward the
letter to him or her. The letter, called an "Early Settlement Letter" notifies
the student that he or she has 20 days to settle with the RIAA by going to a
designated website, entering identifying information, and paying a set amount,
usually between $3,000 and $5,000, but sometimes considerably more. If the
recipient chooses not to settle, the RIAA will file a lawsuit and the offer to
settle for the amount stipulated is no longer an option.

        The University has been notified by the RIAA that we will be receiving a number
of these early settlement letters. After careful consideration, we have decided
to forward the letters to the alleged copyright violators. We do so primarily
because we believe students should have the opportunity to avail themselves of
the settlement option if they so choose. Not forwarding the RIAA letter to
students could result in their being served with a lawsuit, with no chance to
settle it beforehand.

        The University is unable to provide legal services to students who have
violated copyright law through illegal downloading or sharing. If you receive a
letter from the RIAA, we encourage you to engage a personal attorney. If you
have questions, please let us know.

        We know how tempting it is to download music or movies and share files with
your friends. But you need to know that it is illegal to do so and that the
consequences can be severe. Please inform yourself of the requirements of the
law and please obey it. Otherwise, it may prove costly for you and your family.

Sincerely yours,

Eric S. Godfrey
Vice Provost for Student Life
OVPSL@u.washington.edu
"
Space

Submission + - Sixty Years of UFO Sightings -- Any Conclusions? (whattofix.com)

DanielMarkham writes: "Sixty years ago this month a salesman flying a light plane in the Pacific Northwest spotted what he called "flying saucers". The name stuck, and over the next six decades the world went through all kinds of gyrations as we tried to come to grips with just whatever the heck is going on up there.

So aside from making lots of money for various "In Search Of" and "Unsolved Mysteries" shows, what progress, if any, have we made on the issue? The usual quote from skeptics is "where's the physical evidence?", but we have many simultaneous sighting and radar contacts on record. True believers insist on a governmental cover-up of massive proportions, which, to put it mildly, seems highly improbable.

Are there some conclusions we can reach? Is sixty years of sightings enough to reach any kind of conclusions at all?"

Democrats

Submission + - Diane Feinstein vs. The First Amendment

CodeBuster writes: United Press International reports that, "U.S. Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., said Sunday she is "looking at" the possibility of reviving the fairness doctrine for U.S. broadcasters. Feinstein, speaking on "Fox News Sunday" with Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., said talk radio in particular has presented a one-sided view of immigration reform legislation being considered by the Senate. U.S. talk radio is dominated by conservative voices."

Slashdot Top Deals

Work is the crab grass in the lawn of life. -- Schulz

Working...