Of course not, but how does that matter? Corporations are evil. CEOs are evil. We need communism NOW so that we can disappear anyone who disagrees and finally have a free society. You need to go read your Das Kapital and take a good hard look at your life before it's too late.

Yeah, that's fucking terrible and all, but I can't imagine how that might be relevant to the discussion at hand. Was it just your way of saying `Down with all corporation!' or what?

No. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you aren't a religious idiot who wants creation `scientists' on the show. This is not a university lecture where it is his job to spoon fed you every last detail. It is an introduction to various topics, and if you are interested, you can go learn more on your own. It functions well (or at least the original did) in enabling people, particularly children, to know that concepts even exist and be able to ask questions about them.

Actual education is not something so low effort that you can get if from a one-hour show with thirteen episodes.

He does not have a valid point and his post is flamebait.

He was convicted of insider trading and embezzlement, and some computer crime I don't really remember. Whatever it was, it was not relevant and used dishonestly by the crybaby idiot in TFA to imply that it was in the context of copyright. Reading this emotion-appealing hyperbole collection makes me kinda regret trying to defend copyright just yesterday.... I hate both sides of this `debate'.

Fuck evolution and fuck nature. I don't give a shit how species development works or if it will continue to work at all. Intelligence has made evolution obsolete. If you think it's so important, then feel free to line yourself up to die.

The new Opera is just a butchered Chrome with less features. Please don't use crappy knock-offs made by sellouts.

You refuse to pay what the asker wants and download it without paying anyway, and somehow the RIAA is the glutton. Riiiiiiight~

So what you want is instant gratification because you are unable to wait patiently for six months. Okay, fair enough.

Why is it wrong to for them to make a profit? I understand and sympathize with the criticisms of the entertainment industries which constantly pushing for harsher laws, but the other major side of this fight expects it to be a charity. I don't see (very many) people seriously demanding car companies start selling cars at cost.

I don't know about these `artists' of which you speak, but I personally have never gotten any nutrition or shelter from the bubbly feeling I get when I do something nice on the internet.

Scientists that give their work away for free are almost invariably funded by the government. May I assume that you have no objection to supporting movie studios by taxes? Of course, to match this completely, the government should also have some say in what gets funded, just as with scientific research.

Have you ever heard of something called `insurance'? You should look it up, it's pretty nifty.

Stockholders do not manage the company. They vote for the board of directors, which manages the rest. Only in special circumstances, like an offer to privatize the company, do the votes have any direct effect.

Should citizen voters be liable for prison time if they elect a senator who turns out to be corrupt?