why did they wait this long to start screaming about it? This seems like another "October surprise".
Ummm. . . the gag orders in place?
If that were the case, then why would the gag order be lifted now when the trial doesn't begin until September? And if the gag order was lifted, then why did they only go to a deeply partisan "news" source, rather than using a respectable source? I understand that all conservatives are under orders from on high to trash the NYT at every possible opportunity, but there are respectable news sources that lean conservative.
fascist regime
You use that term, but you don't know what it actually means. The context in which you used it demonstrates that quite clearly.
Show me, how are senior Democrats in Wisconsin connected to this?
You've got the links. Show yourself.
It would appear then that the term "senior Democrats" has a different meaning to you than it does to me, then. Also interesting how much different your application of "senior" is when the party in question is Democrat rather than Republican.
It really is overwhelming to try to keep up with how rapidly you change the English language at your whim.
This deal is good for some people, not good for others. If you think it'll work for you, sign up, if you don't, then don't. It seems more than a bit of a stretch to proclaim that the plan is a colossal failure because it does not meet your particular needs.
Don't know if you missed the part where it requires a Nexus 6. Due to Sprint being one of the network providers, it's also very likely to continue to be limited to "approved handsets" only, going forward. So, even if you think this is a great deal and the plans are up your alley, you still also have to want/already own a Nexus 6.
Personally, for my usage, Cricket's $35/mo plan is still a better deal. Plus, it runs on AT&T's network and I can use any unlocked GSM phone I want.
Goodness me, is there no enormity that SJWs won't stoop to?
Yeah, the reason I rant about the blatant stupidity of the term "SJW" if because of idiots like you. You've somehow managed to make an article about side channel attacks and leaky sandboxes with javascript about "social justice warriros".
Because it's totally impossible for a whitelisted website to get hacked.
Moron.
And speaking of which... whitelists? Which year is it? You know written directories of all the websites in the world went out of style in 1996? So how are you supposed to find new ones then? Rely on word of mouth? Well how are THOSE people supposed to know?
So I say again: Moron.
Jesus christ. How can supposedly technical people be (a) so anti science, (b) so gorssly and intentionally uninformed and (c) so fucking stupid.
The information is out there in spades. If you're uninformed at this point you're being willfully ignorant.
I like vaccinations, but i love Liberty more.
Do you agree with the philosophy that my freedom to swing my fists ends at your nose?
How about my freedom to spread dangerous germs?
And I'm enjoying a full-on guffaw at your desperate attempts to do anything to talk about what a bunch of fascists the senior WI Democrats are.
Is there an error in that statement?
But we can run with this. Show me, how are senior Democrats in Wisconsin connected to this? If it were going the other way, with republicans being alleged of "going after" democrats, you would say they were "rogue agents" or "bad actors". You have already convinced yourself that these are party officials, and I'm still waiting for you to connect it to President Lawnchair.
The language standard is larger: of course.
A bit, though not all that much is the core language.
A lot is the libraries.
For a user, the language is easier to use as it's more regular than it used to be, and more obvious idiomatic modern C++ code does the most efficient thing too, so fewer dangerous hacks needed.
Actually, it's that government officials improperly took it upon themselves to use their positions to harass perceived opponents with no legal basis.
That is the allegation so far. This is why there will be a court hearing, to determine how much of a gap exists between reality and perception.
The two reasons I did the "research" are (1) it sounded plausible, if a little bit "out there," and (2) if there's some substance to it, it shouldn't be all that hard to find. And it wasn't hard - several articles mention that a judge named Peterson had quashed the subpoenas, we had the name of the Wisconsin Growth Club, and a bit of digging yielded O'Keefe's name and the judicial district.
One thing I find interesting in this is the timing. If this really happened that long ago (in political time) why did they wait this long to start screaming about it? This seems like another "October surprise".
You wanna see me in person?
That's a strange question. Why would I want that?
Where there's a will, there's a relative.