Weak! My previous journal entry, which I planned to edit by adding comments, has been archived, so comments can't be added. Oh well. I'll just put commentary into this one. Original = italics, new = plain text. Old text has been trimmed. Read the original if you want.

- The iPhone will do quite well. There WILL be lines at 6pm on 6/29. (I'm going to the mall that day to see for myself and will post links to pics/vids in the comments below.)

Well, another commitment prevented me from making it out, but there were lines. (I made this point because someone, somewhere--not just a nobody, but someone you might have read; I wish I remembered who--said the iPhone hype was fake and there wouldn't be lines.) Not only were there lines, but they were shown on most major news channels. How well did it do? A bit of searching puts it at 500-700 thousand units in the first weekend. Bloomber.com says "The iPhone broke AT&T's opening-weekend records, selling more in three days than phones such as Motorola Inc.'s Razr did in their first month, according to spokesman Michael Coe."

- Once the iPhone is out, we'll see some more hardware updates, probably starting in August or September. So far this year all we've seen are slightly faster MacBooks, a move to Santa Rosa in the MacBook Pro, and the addition of an eight-way Mac Pro. Except for the 8-way, the Mac Pro line hasn't changed since its introduction almost a year ago. The Mac Mini is also very overdue for an update--it is overpriced and underpowered, and since I've got a G4 Mini that I want to upgrade--but won't at the current price--I hope Apple doesn't let this line languish.

I'm 2 for 2 so far (or a bit more; see below) and wow, when it rains, it pours. Today (August 7) we saw...
- the new iMac
- upgrades to the Mac mini (Core 2 Duo CPUs)
- upgrade for the Airport Extreme Base Station (gigabit ethernet)
- and, something I didn't expect to happen--upgrades to iLife, iWork, and .Mac.
(When making my predictions, I didn't say anything about Apple's software products.)

There is also some new software for the iPhone (in addition to last week's update) as I mentioned below. To be honest, I'm looking forward to much larger updates (video recording!!!) but I'm surprised, pleased, and impressed by how many updates Apple has dropped for the iPhone and how quickly they're coming.

- There will NOT be a touchscreen iPod until after Christmas AT THE EARLIEST. Yes, it's a nice technology. Yes, Apple can and will release one eventually--hell, they could have released one ALREADY if they wanted to, right? I mean, what's easier to make: and iPod or an iPod/phone/Internet thingie? DUH. They KNOW they can. They KNOW people want them. But they DON'T want them to cut into iPhone sales. I bet they won't even release 100/120 GB iPods until then, or change the Shuffle or Nano lines. January at the ABSOLUTE EARLIEST; maybe in time for Valentine's day (like they did with the introduction of the colored Shuffle this year), otherwise wait for Spring or Summer.

- Similarly, the iPhone WON'T get minor revs (higher capacity, lower price) until after Christmas. Major revs, like the ability to use faster-than-EDGE cellular data networks, won't arrive for 9-15 months. Some improvements could be handled just in software updates--the ability to use native IM, or send MMS, or record video with the built-in camera--but given the recent debacle over the $1.99 802.11N update, I'm not sure which of these Apple could/would roll out for free. If they don't come free in a software update, look for them in iPhone 2.0, Spring/Summer 2008. Faster networking WILL be in the next major rev of the iPhone.

Wow, was I ever wrong here. Turns out Apple does not want to milk huge margins out of a handful of customers, and force everyone who wants a touchscreen iPod to buy an iPhone. Turns out they'd rather make aggressive moves and try to capture as much market as possible. The special event on September 5 brought out an ENTIRELY new iPod line, ranging from new colors on the Shuffle to video and a new shape for the Mini to a huge 160 GB capacity for the Classic plus the introduction of the Touch plus a staggering $200 price drop on the iPhone. Wow. I'm speechless. One note regarding margins--if they were able to drop the price $200, that pretty much means the profit on each (original) iPhone was over $200. Wow. Nice. Let's just say the profits went from $250 down to $50--that means they've got to sell 5x as many iPhones as they originally planned to make the same amount of money. We'll see how they do. Overall, this is a big move to solidify the iPod's market dominance.

- As I've said, I have no plans to get an iPhone any time soon. I predict they'll be $249 by mid-2009, at which time I'll buy. Unless my current cell phone dies--then I *might* buy one. But probably not even then. Long story short: as cool as the iPhone is, it doesn't do anything I *need*, or even really *want,* outside of the usual hey-that's-a-neat-feature. (Google maps! Cool! Too bad I don't ever go anywhere but back and forth between my house and my two jobs.) I like my current phone, and it's smaller than the iPhone is or ever will be, and *that's* really important to me. (I don't carry a PDA, because I hate carrying big, heavy crap, and my iPod only gets used in my car.) The only thing I'd like would be a better (~1MP) camera--mine only does 320x240. The introduction of true GPS might also push me to buy one--that's one device I *do* want (I've got one, but with a tiny B/W screen) and would be willing to carry.

And finally, I got this one wrong too. :-) I got an unexpected raise at work the same time the price came down, so I got one of the last (and cheapest) 4 GB models. (OTOH, I got it at the price I wanted--$249.) Overall, I'm happy enough. For phone-related stuff, my old one did some things better. The iPhone obviously does more, and it's quite cool and fun to play with, but it's not better in every single respect. I felt a bit sad when I switched my account over and my old one complained "SIM card not recognized" or whatever the message was.

Here are my Apple predictions.

- The iPhone will do quite well. There WILL be lines at 6pm on 6/29. (I'm going to the mall that day to see for myself and will post links to pics/vids in the comments below.*)

- Once the iPhone is out, we'll see some more hardware updates, probably starting in August or September. So far this year all we've seen are slightly faster MacBooks, a move to Santa Rosa in the MacBook Pro, and the addition of an eight-way Mac Pro. Except for the 8-way, the Mac Pro line hasn't changed since its introduction almost a year ago. The Mac Mini is also very overdue for an update--it is overpriced and underpowered, and since I've got a G4 Mini that I want to upgrade--but won't at the current price--I hope Apple doesn't let this line languish.

- There will NOT be a touchscreen iPod until after Christmas AT THE EARLIEST.** Yes, it's a nice technology. Yes, Apple can and will release one eventually--hell, they could have released one ALREADY if they wanted to, right? I mean, what's easier to make: and iPod or an iPod/phone/Internet thingie? DUH. They KNOW they can. They KNOW people want them. But they DON'T want them to cut into iPhone sales. I bet they won't even release 100/120 GB iPods until then, or change the Shuffle or Nano lines. January at the ABSOLUTE EARLIEST; maybe in time for Valentine's day (like they did with the introduction of the colored Shuffle this year), otherwise wait for Spring or Summer.

- Similarly, the iPhone WON'T get minor revs (higher capacity, lower price) until after Christmas. Major revs, like the ability to use faster-than-EDGE cellular data networks, won't arrive for 9-15 months. Some improvements could be handled just in software updates--the ability to use native IM, or send MMS***, or record video with the built-in camera****--but given the recent debacle over the $1.99 802.11N update, I'm not sure which of these Apple could/would roll out for free. If they don't come free in a software update, look for them in iPhone 2.0, Spring/Summer 2008. Faster networking WILL be in the next major rev of the iPhone.

- As I've said, I have no plans to get an iPhone any time soon. I predict they'll be $249 by mid-2009, at which time I'll buy. Unless my current cell phone dies--then I *might* buy one. But probably not even then. Long story short: as cool as the iPhone is, it doesn't do anything I *need*, or even really *want,* outside of the usual hey-that's-a-neat-feature. (Google maps! Cool! Too bad I don't ever go anywhere but back and forth between my house and my two jobs.) I like my current phone, and it's smaller than the iPhone is or ever will be, and *that's* really important to me. (I don't carry a PDA, because I hate carrying big, heavy crap, and my iPod only gets used in my car.) The only thing I'd like would be a better (~1MP) camera--mine only does 320x240. The introduction of true GPS might also push me to buy one--that's one device I *do* want (I've got one, but with a tiny B/W screen) and would be willing to carry.

* I plan to NOT edit this document so the time/date stamp won't change. Any updates will be in the comments below.
** excuse the caps. Too lazy to add bold/ital tags. :-)
*** For those that don't know, the iPhone can do SMS, and it can send pics with email, but it can't send pics with SMS (pics+SMS=MMS)
**** too bad it can't do video. With the YouTube partnership, I'd think that the ability to shoot video and upload it to YouTube directly from the iPhone would be a great feature.

(Again, filed under 'OS X' because there doesn't seem to be an 'Apple' topic. But they've got 'Amiga' and 'Be.' WTF?!?!?)

The iPhone looks great. Despite what some pundits and slashdot readers think, I'm sure it will be a success, as I've discussed here. I'd love to get one... but I won't. At least, not any time soon.

I can't say this enough--I'm sure the iPhone will be an incredible device. I love great gadgets. I'd love to have one. But...

- I've got a video iPod, but I don't watch movies on it, so a widescreen iPod is not something I need.

- I do a decent amount of text messaging but the fact that it saves my conversations in an iChat-like interface is not something I need--most of my messages are read once and tossed.

- Speaking of texting, I've got a Nokia 6820 with a QWERTY keyboard. I'm sure the touchscreen will be nice, but it'll be hard to beat a physical keyboard. I'll reserve judgment until I try one out, but regardless, I already have a real keyboard, so even if it's decent, the iPhone's full keyboard won't be a huge step up--it's not like I'm coming from the world of texting with 12 buttons.

- visual voicemail looks great--and it's about damn time!--but I don't get that many messages. When I miss a call and get a message, my Nokia offers to show me the number I missed before it offers me the option to listen to the message, so before I call in, I generally know who it is that called. I don't stack up a lot of messages since I don't get that many calls and am usually available when people want me. So it's another cool feature that I don't really need.

- the Internet stuff looks great. Despite the fact that my Axim X50v has twice the screen resolution (640x480 vs. 480x320) I don't doubt that Apple will make browsing better, especially since web browsers on handhelds mostly suck. But again, I'm rarely someplace that I don't have Internet access and an actual computer. Would it occasionally be useful to check the weather while I'm sitting in a movie theater, or look up the price of something online for comparison purposes when I'm in a store? Sure. Would this really be life-altering stuff? No. I doubt (I hope, but I doubt) Apple will make Cingular offer a decent data plan to go along with this. You'll probably be looking at $100/month to really use the Internet over a cellular network--and I don't think the speed via anything but 802.11 will be that great. (Plus, using Google with a regular phone is pretty great.*)

- email. This is the one thing I would kinda really like to have. I'm not a crackberry addict, but there are times I'd like to be able to send real emails instead of text messages. My Nokia should be able to send email, but 1) I never got that working, and 2) I'd prefer it if the messages came from a 'real' email address. But, I've lived without it so far, so again, this one feature won't suddenly make this $500 device worthwhile. Push email is nice, though--no more checking to see if you've got new messages: if they're there, they'll be there. But again, I don't live and die by email, so this isn't a huge deal for me.

- 2 MP camera. Nice. I actually find myself using the incredibly crappy camera built into my phone surprisingly often--mostly for odd-but-useful things, like taking a picture of a store's door to capture the hours it's open. And I wish it were a lot better than it is (352x240) and I wish I would remember to carry my real camera with me for when I see cool stuff. But that alone is not worth shelling out the money for. I really should just keep my PowerShot in the car.

- All the other stuff, like the fancy address book, is nice, but again, just not something I need. Sure, it looks great, but I can use my current phone pretty easily. 90% of my calls are to 10% of my contacts, so I usually just use my 'recently dialed numbers' list, which is 1 button away on my Nokia. Maps looks nice, and I'm sure it's great for finding "nearby' businesses, but I'd rather have real GPS capabilities.

So it does lots and lots and lots of cool stuff, but it doesn't do a single thing I really need. I'll probably get one in late 2008 or early 2009, when my Nokia is dead and the iPhones are $249. But for right now, my Nokia will do. Plus there is one mark in favor of my Nokia that the iPhone will never reach--since it isn't also a widescreen iPod, it's quite small. If you haven't seen one, it's about the size of a candy bar. Bigger than the smallest of phones, but much smaller than the iPhone. Maybe not thinner, but probably shorter and about half the width.

* Google's text messaging features are pretty great. Just put together a short query and text it to GOOGL (46645) and get a text message response back with your query results. It's not a text portal to the full Google site--it's geared towards local stuff and stores and it gives short answers, but it's handy. I've used it to...

- get the number and address of businesses

- get weather info--send 'weather' and your zip code and you'll get the current temp, wind, etc., plus a week's forecast

- check prices--I was in a Best Buy and they had an amp on sale, but they were out of stock. I sent the brand and model to Google and found out that not only was it available at bestbuy.com (just so happened to be the match that they sent back) but that it was $40 less online! (I did the actual purchase at home.)

- and I'm sure there's tons of other stuff it can do, like movie showtimes and whatnot.

Here are some thoughts I've had in the last couple weeks. (Filed under 'OS X' because there doesn't seem to be an 'Apple' category...? Based on this post.)

Success:
- Will it be a success? Yes. Is it pricey? Yes. Is it gorgeous? Yes. And the price will eventually drop, just like the iPod did. It's Apple's famous method: release a really nice, almost perfect product for a bunch of money, sell a bunch to the first batch of buyers; then, when that supply is exhausted, improve it, drop the price, sell again to the next round who weren't willing to buy the first time. Lather, rinse, repeat. (Note: don't look for a widescreen, touchscreen, iPod until MAYBE September for the 2007 Xmas season; more likely, you'll have to wait until Spring 2008. Apple won't let a nice iPod cannibalize sales they'll get to people who buy the iPhone MOSTLY because they want a widescreen iPod. We just saw a perfect example of this: a few months ago (fall 2007), Apple introduced the new Shuffle. Christmas came and went and they sold a zillion. Then, on January 30, 2007, BAM!--the Shuffle now comes in colors, just in time for Valentine's day. Raise your hand if you think this is just a coincidence--that maybe Apple forgot that they knew how to anodize aluminum.

- BUT--the iPod wasn't a success just because it was pretty. It really is a better, easier-to-use MP3 player than anything else out there for most people. The iPhone will ONLY succeed if the touchscreen system works as well as Steve says it does. I can tell it'll be mostly great just by looking--a regular touchscreen could easily handle 90% of the single-finger action he demo'ed--but I'll have to see the keyboard in person to become a believer on that.

- will Apple work out a deal with Cingular to offer a reasonable data plan? No one will be happy with the Internet Communicator of the Future if it costs $100/month to do anything with. For this to really, really work, there has to be reasonably-fast, reasonably-priced data. If it becomes a situation of "Oh, I can't use Safari until I get to Starbucks or Panera" that will be a big buzzkill.

- will they meet their goals? They said they want to sell 10 million phones--have 1% of the market--in 18 months. (God, that sounds like so many WWW business plans I heard in 1995-97--"If we could just get 1% of all web users to visit our site...") That sounds good on the one hand, given that they want 1% of a billion phones, BUT--Cingular only has 60M customers. Is the iPhone so great that ONE SIXTH of Cingular's customer base will spend $500? If not, are that many people going to get out of contracts and switch carriers in the next 18 months? I'm not so sure. Like I said, I really think the iPhone will be a success, but their expectations are pretty high.

Other thoughts:
- no iChat! no iChat A/V! How LAME! Either a) it's part of the deal not to step on Cingular's toes by offering anything like VOIP, or b) it's waiting for Rev B. Unfortunately, my money's on A. Well, at least you can use the browser to access Meebo. In any case, it is a very obvious omission and clearly intentional--given that the SMS system looks just like iChat, it's impossible that they just "forgot" about it. Further weight to my fear that a reasonable data plan won't be part of the deal--if Cingular is pushing this hard to get people to use SMS, they're probably still planning to charge as much for that as possible. Or maybe it's the other way around--with a cheap data plan, everyone would use chat and quit using SMS, and Cingular doesn't want to lose that income. Could go either way.

On a related note, it's also too bad that the camera doesn't swivel and let you use iChat A/V--how many science fiction films have we seen with two-way handheld videoconferencing?

Current iPods have 4:3 screens. (1.33:1.) All Apple's computers are 16:10. (1.6:1.) The iPhone, like the original PBG4, is 3:2. (1.5:1.) So: what shape should iTMS movies be?)

- Proximity sensor--nice. But I hope that's not one of their patents. My Canon XTi turns off the screen when you put it up to your face--and it already exists. ;-)

- Apple will need to add 'Cingular' and 'iPhone' to Leopard's spellcheck dictionary. :-)

- Looks like it has no GPS, just a combination of Google Maps and cell-tower-based. Too bad. Real, accurate positioning in such a device would be AWESOME.

- I'll pick one up in a couple rev's just to have a decent browser. Despite having twice as many pixels as the iPhone, browsing on my Axim mostly sucks.

I've had my new PDA (a used Dell Axim X50v) for a few weeks and have spent some time with three browsers: Opera, Minimo (from Mozilla), and of course the included Internet Explorer from Microsoft. This isn't an exhaustive review of them but there are some things you might be interested in, and I have a few questions that hopefully readers might know the answer to.

MSIE is pretty good, though limited in features, though not much more so than the others. Being made by Microsoft, it works pretty well with their OS (Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition)--it loads pretty fast and everything is sized nicely. (Not all apps work well on the X50v's 640x480 screen--more on that later.) The three layout modes--One Column, Default, and Desktop--work pretty well.

Other than the fact that there is a 'back' button but 'forward' is hidden under a menu (a move I assume meant to save screen space on smaller-screened PDAs) my main gripes are things that the other browser's don't address--there is no way to save the page or image you're looking at, or the ability to right-click on a link and 'Save link as...' like you would with any desktop browser. I'd love to be able to save pages, images, and documents as I find them for later viewing. Since it has wireless built in and I've got 2 GB (!!!) worth of storage (one CF card and one SD card) it seems silly that the only way I can look at content offline is to either sync it with a desktop or copy files onto one of the cards with a card reader. Minor annoyance: I can't delete the included 'AvantGo Channels' bookmark.

Opera was the next browser I tried. Since they now give away their desktop browser, I was surprised to find that their mobile browser seems to only last for 30 days unless you pay. No great loss. Opera's biggest feature--the ability to zoom a page's content (text and images)--works as badly on a handheld as it does on the desktop. It's a great idea, especially on a PDA, but someone at Opera needs to go back to Math class: 125% is about 2 or 3 times larger than 110%. I've had similar (bad) luck with the zoom feature on their desktop browser. I like the built-in orientation-changing feature--something that's built into my Tablet PC but takes several clicks on this handheld--and the multiple windows (tabs) are also great, but otherwise there's no particular reason to use it over the included IE, especially since money is involved. ;-)

Which leads us to Minimo, the mobile browser from Mozilla. As much as I love seeing that little Mozilla icon, it takes forever to launch and slows down my (624 MHz!) Axim like you wouldn't believe, even when it's not in the foreground. I can't give you too many details about it since it doesn't seem to want to launch right now (and I don't feel like resetting my PDA, which is what I think I had to do last time to get it to work*) but the one thing I remember most is that it was totally NOT designed with any kind of resolution-independence in mind. (I know it's hard, since phone and PDA screens might be 128x128, 160x160, 320x240, or 640x480; not to mention unclassifiable devices like the Nokia 770, but c'mon, haven't we learned anything about inches and pixels from using the greatest cross-platform application of all time--the Web--in the last decade?) Most of the controls were TINY and a few were HUGE. Looking at the 320x240 screenshot on the project page, I remember that the buttons in the left column were tiny, as was the page text, and the radio buttons on the homepage were huge--overlapping, in fact. Again, there is no save-this-page or -link feature that I could find, so between that and the slowness, I see no reason to stray far from IE.**

So, that's my brief overview of the Pocket PC browsers I've tried. Are there any others that are any good? Am I missing out by not using the two I've mentioned so far? Should I get a Palm device instead?

* One gripe about this PDA/OS in general: I understand the idea of leaving apps running to make switching faster, but why isn't there a good way to exit them when you really want to? I leave the Switcher Bar running but most of the times when I use it to quit an app I get the the ``"Program X" is not responding`` message, whether the app is from Microsoft or a third party. I'm sure I killed Minimo at some point which is probably why it doesn't want to come up for me, but no other apps have refused to 'come back from the dead' like this.

** No, I'm not an MS shill. I don't love them or hate them or their products any more than I do Linux, Apple, or anything else. Overall, that is--I very much dislike some things they do, like they intentionally break things like the decade-old standards for CSS and PNG, or .DOC interoperability, or SMB interoperability, and of course I don't like them using their desktop market share to stomp out competitors large and small, but I really like some of the things they make, like Windows 2000 and Office X for Mac. (There's always that sweet spot with MS--when the products are big enough to have a good amount of features, but not so big that they're overstuffed, and when the usability:clutter ratio is favorable. Hence, my love for their half-decade-old products. I hate XP and Vista, and Office 2004 for Mac, but Office 2007 for Windows looks nice, though more for the live preview feature than for the ribbon.) That said, my primary computers--home desktop, work desktop at two jobs, and my laptop--are all OS X Macs. My next project is to try to get ActiveSync working with this Axim under Parallels. Until then, I need to go buy a new 6-in-1 card reader to replace my old CF-only unit.

Totally random thing: I just bout a 1 GB CF card from Staples. It is from PNY and cost $20. (!!!) I popped it into my CF reader and the volume name is 'TOSHIBA1G02.'

So, it's already the end of 2006. That means it's been ten whole years since I worked at Cybersmith. I can't believe it. My life is just whipping by. But, be that as it may, I've always been into nostalgia, so I think I'll write down as much as I can remember about the place and see if anyone else has anything to add. Feel free to comment if you ever worked at one or visited.

Cybersmith, for those that don't know, was a cyber cafe, and one of the first in the SF Bay Area. (And probably close to one of the last--they never really took off quite like a lot of people expected them to.) In SF, there was CoffeeNet on Harrison, and Internet Alfredo right near where 280 dead-ends, and another one with a kinda generic name right near (almost under) the Bay Bridge, and Cybersmith was the fourth I found. I was actually doing a Yahoo! search (or maybe AltaVista) for cyber cafes in the area and I saw, in an article about CoffeeNet (probably this one), a mention of Cybersmith.

Long story short (too late!) I called, asked if they were hiring, and headed down right away. As it turns out, it was their very first day open when I showed up to apply. Being a techy type of person--exactly the kind of person who would be visiting cybercafes in 1996--it surprised me to learn that they were looking more for retail types than techy types, but luckily I had a few years of movie theater experience and I got the job. My first day, coincidentally, was the "official" grand opening a week or so later. Cybersmith was actually based on the East Coast, with 3 stores in and around Boston, and a few of the original employees were from Boston. The store was in a nice location on University in Palo Alto. My commutes were always off-hours and it took about a half hour to get there. This was when 101 was becoming pretty high-tech--on the way to work I passed Oracle (this was right around when the Internet was starting to take off, and they opened a new Benz dealership right next to Oracle), and Excite, and Sybase, I think, and a few places like that. Now 101 is just packed with those places but when it was all new was very cool to see happening.

Aaaaanyway... Cybersmith. It was a very cool place. It was in the 'small town' part of Palo Alto--just a short walk to Pizza-a-Go-Go, yum--and the store itself was nice. Real wood floor and custom cherry-wood furniture. All the computer stations had these curved benches so 2 or 3 people could share a computer. The monitors (17" Compaq CRTs) swiveled too.

Ah yes, the computers--Compaq Presarios, except for a couple Macs in the back where you could take your picture and put it on a shirt or mousepad, or make a screensaver. We had (let's see if I remember) 16 Internet stations which were 133 MHz Pentiums, and 12 game stations that were 166s. I always thought the fast Internet would be a big draw but it was the games that kept asses in seats. People would come in and play Command and Conquer for hours. Most kids came in to game and most adults had fast access at work by then.

Besides computers, we had four N64s--some of the first in the country, I was told--and two Dreamcasts. Also a cool two-player VR game (name?) with those big headsets, which ran off of a 486 with two graphics cards (one for each eye) and was a whole lot of fun. Also a dopey morphing photo booth, an attraction we called "smellovision" (which had a larger headset and simulated flying over stuff, complete with scents) and two arcade-style games--snow skiing and jet ski. The original manager was a really cool guy who could take first place on the ski game standing backwards--it was quite impressive to watch. I never got that good, but after many plays (employees played for free, heh) I could do a respectable run on the bunny slope. The original manager left soon after I started--like, a week or so--and the rest of the staff was just a regular good staff.

We also served food, though, sadly for a cyber cafe, there was a catch: because of how laws were at the time, we weren't able to let the people wander around, or even use the computers, with food--it had to be eaten in the dining area. Kinda took the "cafe" out of "cybercafe" (or took out the "cyber;" your choice) not being able to eat while at a machine. But the food was really, really good. I ate there about half the time (our employee discount made the prices reasonable); the other nights (I almost always worked nights) I went to the aforementioned Pizza-a-Go-Go. (Great pizza, and they had some kinda deal where you could get a slice, a drink and a shirt for like five bucks. I've still got mine, and wear it, but it's kinda falling apart--I really need to see about getting a new one.) The one thing I remember being excellent (the lady who ran the counter was really quite good) were the focaccia sandwiches. The pizza was pretty good, though Go Go had better pies, and more variety, of course. (Mmm, pesto.)

So, that's about it. I loved that place to death, though I only worked there a few months. I had been mostly out of work all that summer--just temping some--but right after I started, I got a call from a place I used to work at, wanting me back for substantially more money, so (to keep my taxes simple, since the new/old job was in another state) I worked through the last full pay period that I could and still get my last check before the year ended. So my last day was probably just before Christmas. I remember taking my sister there and we had out picture taken and put onto a mousepad for my aunt. (Just so happens it was a really good picture.) The rest of my family came by once or twice.

I hated working the "door" (standing outside trying to get people in) but otherwise it was great. After hours we'd play networked Quake (hence this article's icon), joining a game found on stomped.com if there weren't enough of us in-house for a good match. I got my ass kicked more than I'd like to admit but it was still damn good fun--I've always liked playing video games against human opponents rather than computer-generated enemies. It's much more fun to play against someone who's just as fast, smart, and well-armed as you, rather than wave after wave of beasts with bad AI that you just mow through, or ultra-powerful bosses that take 20 tries to beat.

So, that's about it. Kinda random, no big point or conclusion, just some assorted memories from a happy time in my life. Anyone have anything to add?

Now, Cybersmith--my store, and the whole company (a division/sister of Learningsmith and Booksmith, like 'blacksmith' or 'goldsmith' I guess)--is long gone. (As is almost every other place I've ever worked at, sadly.) It stayed around for a couple years but it never did that great, I guess. I mean, it did OK, it was never totally empty, and sometimes it was quite packed, plus birthday parties were surprisingly popular, but I guess Palo Alto has some pretty steep rent and it takes a lot to stick around in that area. I visited a couple times, went and saw Titanic with my old boss once, but after a couple years, it was no more. It stayed empty for a while. I forget what's in there now, but last time I was there, I think I remember smiling when I noticed they still had the same light wood floor. (Which, by the way, I had to mop most nights. Well, I didn't have to, but someone had to, and no one else ever did.)

According to this post, MS is recommending that people use transparent GIFs, not PNGs, in Gadgets. Because even though the PNG standard is about a decade old, MSIE famously can't deal with alpha transparency very well,* and I guess something along those lines is sticking it browser-crashing nose into Gadgets in Vista.

Do they have any plans to fix this? Of course not! From the post: "I would encourage you to change to using transparent GIF moving forward... the SDK will be updated with this new info in our next release."

Can you fucking believe that? Abandon PNG... moving forward?!?!?

* MSIE, by default, only deals with GIF-style, transparent-or-not transparency in PNGs. There are workarounds but as far as simplicity goes they're a far cry from the plain old <img src> tag that any other browser can use.

I just bought a Dell PC from http://www.dell.com/outlet. It has (Genuine!) Windows XP Media Center 2005. I ordered it Friday, 6/16/2006. The site shows it was shipped on Saturday, 6/17/2006. They've got a nifty page to track my order status but no way to track the package itself, like a UPS or FedEx tracking number. Should arrive between Wednesday and Friday. One nice thing about Dell: they're in Texas, kind of in the middle of the country. This compares favorably to the 8+ days I wait for Macs to come from California. I don't need it, but I've wanted to see what Media Center looks like, and I figured this was a pretty cheap way to find out.

Brief specs:
Dell Dimension, either an E310 or a 3100, I'm not really sure.
2.8 GHz HT P4
512 MB RAM
80 GB SATA hard drive

More info once it arrives...

Update #1: OK, so I sent them an email and got back an automated reply that informs me "The tracking numbers may not be listed on the site for up to 3 business days after the order has shipped." So, there's a very good chance that it will be here before UPS's site even knows they have it. This kind of basic thing is pretty retarded. Most other merchants post a tracking number promptly. Dell should look into that. I hear they can do cool things with computers these days. :-)

Update #2: The Dell showed up on Wednesday, before I was every given any tracking info. Of course delivery was attempted while no one was home. Luckily the UPS center is close, I was going out at that time anyway so I could combine trips, and I was able to make it there before their 8pm closing.

Talk about minimalist packaging: I could look into the carrying holes and see the ports on the back panel. The computer was suspended in a foam skeleton, rather than being completely encased in foam. I don't know if their non-refurbished gear is sent like this, and I know intellectually it's not much of a problem, but it just struck me as odd, especially compared to how Apple packs things.

So: the first thing I did after taking it out of the box was try to get it open. Took a couple minutes, and I even looked at the (paper) documentation, which don't cover this at all. There's a little sliding locking thingie on the case but it's not just a lock--you pull it 'till it resists, then you pull a bit more and that makes the side panel pop off. The case is a bit on the large size, and it seems a bit on the heavy side was well for how little is in there.

I also discovered it is a Dimension E310--says so right on the front. It has a 2.8 GHz HT P4, 512 MB shared RAM, an 80 GB SATA HD, and a CD-RW/DVD-ROM drive. The only ports are VGA, ethernet, USB, and audio in and out, plus a PCI modem. No PS/2 or parallel, and sadly no DVI, but I didn't expect that at this price. I've got a PCI video card with DVI that I can put in down the road if I want. No FireWire, either. Oh well. I didn't really want to play with MovieMaker on my Media Center PC anyway. </sarcasm>

As it happens, I got a Windows Vista Public Beta DVD the previous day and it installed like crap on my 800 MHz Compaq Deskpro--bad video, and worse: no ethernet, which makes it pretty much useless. So the first thing I did with the Dell was unplug the SATA drive, pop in a 30 GB* IDE drive as Slave behind the DVD drive, enable the new drive in the BIOS, and install Vista. It went on fine and looks beatiful. Video came in at 1600x1200 and the networking works so I can actually do stuff besides just play Solitaire. I have to admit: Vista looks very pretty. It runs about as well as Mac OS X 10.0 did when it first came out, which is to say it makes this 2.8 GHz computer feel like a Pentium 100 with Windows 95. But, the fact that Vista runs on a machine like this--not old, but about as low-end as you can get these days--is good. Published specs and early reports had me worried. The UI looks nice, but I don't see all the glowing stuff I had seen in Channel 9 videos, so I guess I'm not getting the whole Aero "experience."

* MS says the beta needs a 40 GB drive with 15 GB space; I was happy that it didn't reject the 30 GB unit.

The 'Read more...' link--the one I always click--is also right aligned. It used to be the very first thing on a line.

'Score' is right-aligned. I much prefer it to be immediately after the comment title, as it used to be. I find it extremely annoying to read a comment and not know if the author is being serious or not. Having to look all the way to the right and then back to the left is almost as bad.

I hate vertical bar quoting. Occasionally, it produces spectacularly bad results.
http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/04/048230
http://apple.newbox.org/pics/slashdot/quoting.png

The numbers in lists go left of the margin.
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=187638&cid=15478428
http://apple.newbox.org/pics/slashdot/numbers.png

In this box below, the checkbox touches the 't' in 'Submit'
http://apple.newbox.org/pics/slashdot/submit.png

The old site used Times for body copy, which I think looks much nicer than a san-serif font.

Hi all,

I want to create a list of examples of why DRM and extended copyrights are bad. My goal is to make something that can appeal to many aspects of an average person's life, not just rants that sound like they come from the warez crowd. A list of irrefutable facts that can be printed on one side of 8.5x11" paper andeasily read and understood in a couple minutes by anyone. Some examples:

From today's article: Imagine a restricted audio CD. A library buys one and loans it out to patrons, as libraries have done for over 20 years. Imagine copyright law doesn't get any worse and the recording goes into public domain someday. How will the DRM know to turn itself off? On a related note: what if the keyholder goes out of business?

The whole point of copyright is that it grants creators a temporary monopoly to encourage people to create and release their works. It was never intended to be eternal.

Add some info about the original DivX--what happens when a DRM company goes under.

Disney is completely hypocritical. They are the strongest proponents of eternal copyrights yet they built their empire on public domain works--Snow White, Cinderella, etc. Yes, Mickey Mouse was an original creation and an icon, but can you name a single Mickey Mouse movie other than Steamboat Willie? Most of their success came from these and other classic stories.

Hollywood is completely hypocritical. The reason they're on the west coast was to put geographic distance between themselves and enforcers of Edison's patents. (citations?)

Universal Studios are complete assholes who assume that everything belongs to them and they're always right. "Donkey Kong was the early hit that cemented Nintendo's position in the video-game business, and the cash cow that sustained the fledgling Nintendo of America. Nintendo was flying high. Until, that is, Nintendo's Japanese office received a telex from MCA Universal stating that the company had 48 hours to hand all profits earned from Donkey Kong over to MCA and destroy all unsold Donkey Kong inventory. The reason? MCA alleged that Donkey Kong infringed on Universal Studios' "King Kong" copyright. Nintendo had a very good reason for refraining from a settlement: It had discovered that MCA did not own the "King Kong" copyright! Even more shockingly, in a previous lawsuit MCA Universal had actually gone to pains to prove that the "King Kong" property was public domain!" (I'd like to find some more info on this.)

Please, add more in the comments, and feel free to discuss/rebuke/refine anything you see in this or in the comments. My goal is to make a good list of factually correct assertions that cannot be denied.

Remember the points: copyright, as originally described, is good. (Granting artists a temporary monopoly on their works to encourage them to create and share, with the agreement that in exchange for this protection, the works will enter the public domain someday.) Eternal copyright is not. Technology used to create de facto eternal copyright is not. Copyright based on the life of a company, instead of a person, is not.

Title: 400 Bad Request

Bad Request

Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Request header field is missing colon separator.

Apache/1.3.33 Server at www.slashdot.org Port 8080

Safari 1.3.1 on 10.3.9 with Saft and Stand

I popped my shiny new "Revenge of the Sith" DVD into my computer and saw something very strange--the disc is named "CHARLOTTE_DISC1." Huh? Hang on... yup, the "extras" disc is "CHARLOTTE_DISC2." WTF?!? Googling just bring up a bunch of posts from people named "Charlotte" or who live in Charlotte, NC or who talk about "Charlotte's Web" also. Anyone know why this is? If you don't know, do you have a guess? Conspiracy theory, even? Any ideas at all, please post below.

Update: Mystery solved. Short version: it was the code name for the product and was not intended for release. "It's the result of a method used by the industry to safeguard some of its high-profile projects from publicity leaks -- a class of projects that includes Revenge of the Sith. 'Charlotte' was the codename assigned to the Episode III DVD project."

Like the old infamous "how to talk to your kid" guides, this page from Microsoft is hysterical, at least to us rotten kids. Although, I have to say, their description--"Leet... is a specific type of computer slang where a user replaces regular letters with other keyboard characters to form words phonetically--creating the digital equivalent of pig Latin with a twist of hieroglyphics"--is great.

Another day, another office suite that will supposedly, once again, "replaced [sic] the... incredibly bloated and slow MS Office."

OK, here's the deal. It will be ages, if ever, before an office suite even makes a dent in MS's offering. I like OOo as much as the next slashdot reader, but you have to know that for every friend, relative, and small business you convince to use an alternative, there are a thousand companies, with a thousand seats each, that have bought and will continue to buy MS Office. Keynote might be making a dent in PowerPoint, but those files are much more likely than Word documents or spreadsheets to be kept to oneself. However, the ability to share Word docs and spreadsheets is essential. Businesses using these apps need to be able to open, change, save, and send without any custom settings. Period. There's an old quote: "GM isn't in the business of making cars. GM is in the business of making money." Similarly, a business is not in the business of learning how software works. A business uses software as one of its many tools it has to make money. If they need to learn more about the software to get things done, fine, but they'd rather not. The software they can use with the least learning, wins.

No one wants to hear about saving as HTML or RTF. No one wants to hear about "vendor lock-in" or all the other good reasons NOT to use Word. Businesses want to a) open all their existing documents and b) continue doing what they're doing.

Remeber in the old days the saying was "No one ever got fired for buying IBM"? Now it's the same with MS. We all know business reality is ugly and non-ideal but the sooner you accept that business reality is reality, as far as businesses are concerned, the better off you'll be. Imagine these two conversations:

Boss: "Why can't Joe read the document I sent him?"
You: "Because he has a different version of Word than you have."
Boss: "Oh. Stupid Microsoft. Can you fix it?"

or

Boss: "Why can't Joe read the document I sent him?"
You: "Because Joe has MS Office and you have an alternative office suite which is free as in free and 99% compatible but not quite perfect because M$ changes formats all the time but it's more stable and less bloated and launches faster but uses an open document format by default so you need to export as .DOC or .RTF or export to .PDF or HTML or Joe can download it (112 MB) for free or..."
Boss: "This aggrivation is not worth $400. Shut up about vendor lock-in and all your free-as-in-speech hippy friends. Run out to Staples and get me MS Office" if you're lucky or "Shut up. You're fired" if you're not.

It is possible (or was, once upon a time) to unseat the reigning king, but the chances of that happening again are unlikely. At best, it'll happen in another 5-10 years. This article is an excellent story but it's worth remembering that a) file formats are several orders of magnitude more complex now and b) there are several orders of magnitude more Excel users today than there were Lotus 1-2-3 users back then. And as for point A, it is, of course, in MS's interest to keep changing the format--whether it's so they can add new features or just to screw competing developers really doesn't matter. The reality is they have and will continue to do so.

Aside: When I first played with the professional version of Acrobat, which will let you actually edit text, I thought right away that Adobe had a better chance of killing Word than anyone else. They could have made a word processor--even one as simple as MS's WordPad--with PDF as its native format. They could have sold this for $50-100 (instead of screwing around with Acrobat Business Tools) and made a mint and would have made a huge dent in the number of .DOC files out there. If they would have combined with OO or StarOffice or AppleWorks or AbiWord or whatever and had a really powerful $150-250 word cruncher, they would have knocked Word off the block instantly.

Think about it--you could make documents that by default (key point there) would be readable on every platform with Acrobat Reader (or something similar) which everyone already has ('nuther key point there). Everyone already knows what a PDF is. (Ask the average man on the street--hell, as the average slashdotter--what SXW is and most won't know. Hell, even God^Hogle says "Did you mean: swf.") For a mere $50 (or whatever), the recipient could edit the document as well, and for, say, $200, they'd have all the power of tables, revisions, authors, etc. "Office" would be no more--people would have Adobe's word processor and Excel. Bam, half the battle won, and as a bonus, Adobe would be more suited to the moniker "The Document Company" than Xerox. But anyway, we're getting off track here. Adobe won't be making a word processor anytime soon.

Yes, Mac OS X can make PDFs from any application that can print. Yes, you can make PDFs for free in Windows. Yes, OOo has built-in one-click PDF support. Doesn't matter. Doesn't matter that all OOo docs are just gzipped XML and your data can never, ever be lost or unreadable. Doesn't matter that IBM likes it. Your boss, and his secretary, want to launch a word cruncher, type, click the floppy disc icon, and email the result to someone. They don't want to hear about exporting. They don't want to save two copies. If it's not interchangable by default, it has no chance to take over the world. Office won't be unseated anytime soon.

(And the thought that an Apple product will kill Office? Puh-lease. Even if every Mac user dropped Office overnight, that's less than 5% of the document-making world. And just like Safari and IE, MS would kill Office for Mac and bam! there goes the ability to keep Macs in the enterprise. I love Apple, but it ain't gonna happen.)