I was disappointed when I got Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit and found out that it didn't support local multiplayer. I wouldn't have bought the game if I had known that. Yes, I could have checked, but given the fact that every Need for Speed game that I have bought in the past was multiplayer, it didn't even dawn on me that it might not be. Lesson learned. Perhaps, as more people realize this, video game manufacturers will lose sufficient sales to encourage them to put local multiplayer back in.

If by equally biased, you are talking about MSNBC, then sure. But if you're saying all the other news channels are equally biased than you are truly a special kind of person. CNN and the major network news organizations do have a bias. This is true. However none of them so heartily embrace one side of the aisle in their coverage as FOX News and MSNBC.

If what I've found on the internet is correct, because it is a 4-4 decision, it sets no precedent. Therefore this ruling is only in effect for this case. IANAL and I may be totally wrong, but that's the best information I have at this moment.

That said, wtf were the four that voted to uphold the decision thinking?

Yes, because, in a state that has such a large dependence on tourism based around nature, most bullets sold are primarily for the purpose of murder rather than hunting, wildlife management, or target shooting.

In 2009, there were 175 murders in Colorado. In 1981, the year with the greatest number of murders on record, there were 239. These are total counts for murder, they do not delineate gun murders from any other method. In 2008 approximately 41,000 pheasant roosters were harvested. That's just pheasants. I'm not even going to take the time to find out the bag totals of other animals/hunting seasons.

Nobody's "pretending" that the majority of bullets sold are for hunting.

The point is that even though these tools are obviously not designed for killing other people, they can be, and have been, misused to do so.

Answer: The last digit of pi.

There is no moral equivalence. Anyone who argues that selling bullets makes someone responsible for murder is an idiot. Selling a tool doesn't make you responsible for how the tool is used or misused, unless you had complicit knowledge of future illegal acts. Anyone can buy a steak knife, anyone can buy a car, heck, anyone can buy a bathtub and a blow dryer. The seller of these is no more responsible for any future murders committed with these "weapons," than the cashier at the local big box mart was for selling the Columbine murderers their bullets.

The millionaire movie maker trying to make his point was being an ass. The (likely) minimum wage cashier was only trying to make a living. Harassing someone to sell a few DVD's is disgusting.

My wife recently got a letter stating that she was in the pool for potential jurors this year. My first thought was "That's so cool." Her first words were "I wonder how I can get out of it." I was disappointed.

Indeed you are correct. It was a poor choice of words, with the phrase used as an expression of incredulity rather than using it for what it actually means. Will you ever forgive me? ;)