Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Anything unique? (Score 2) 223

Do they still "look just like" or are they "the same thing?" It used to be very easy to distinguish Qt applications on OS X when I used to use it a couple of years ago. The widgets looked very similar but you could instantly recognize that they were not quite right. It would be nice to know if the situation has improved.

Comment Re:Anything unique? (Score 3, Interesting) 223

For RAD I've had some good experiences in the pas with RealBasic (renamed to Xojo some time ago). At the time the GNU/Linux support was quite ok but they haven't really kept up. 64 bit is still missing for example so running anything you build with it will require a couple of 32 bit system libraries to be installed.

Submission + - GNOME 3.16 Released (gnome.org)

kthreadd writes: Version 3.16 of GNOME, the primary desktop environment for GNU/Linux operating systems has been released. Some major new features in this release include a overhauled notification system, an updated design of the calendar drop down and support for overlay scrollbars. Also, the grid view in Files has been improved with bigger thumbnail icons, making the appearance more attractive and the rows easier to read. A video is available which demonstrates the new version.

Comment Re:From a simpler era (Score 1) 95

Javascript itself is a plugin. Any concept of distinction is flawed. Lets say in the panaea of worlds, Oracle gave Java tech and all its reference impl's away for free BSD styled. What if anything would be the harm of writing browser scripts in Java vs. Javascript vs. go vs. .net-whatever, etc.. if every single browser developer had access to native embeddable runtimes embedded into the tool?

If it was built into every single browser then things would be different. But that doesn't matter right now because it's not. It doesn't matter how great of a technology it is if you can't run it on an iPhone.

Comment Re:Open sores, lol (Score 1) 64

If you can't give it to anyone else then it's absolutely not open source. Free redistribution is even the first criteria in the Open Source Definition, which most people, organizations and governments use when defining open source. Simplifying open source to mean just that I can look at the source code therefore it's open source is taking away the very thing that is the core of what open source is.

Slashdot Top Deals

Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.

Working...