I think the real question is how often do we have scenes with two robots in them, talking about something other than humans.

No, not really.

Have they tried pumping large amounts of oil into the ground to push the water out?

I can see fathers objecting to their daughter's suitors on the grounds that they are GMOs. They'll start to demand labeling.

Until a few months ago, I carried a Blackberry for work a physical keyboard. The keyboard was nice and I miss it.

[quote]
Mr. Kamm is an editorial writer and columnist for the Times of London. His latest book is âoeAccidence Will Happen: The Non-Pedantic Guide to English Usage.â
[/quote]
Nevertheless, the author has also thought up some rules that he thinks will help you write clearly and would like to sell them to you.

Scientifically, I agree the clone should qualify.

But how is this an issue for the courts? Why should there be a legal definition of a certified quarter horse?

I just think if a dorky organization wants to certify horses that exclude clones, they should be able to until such time as it comes becomes bankrupt.

When it goes pear-shaped, your boss can declare it went pear-shaped because of your imagined failings, clearly not a decision he made. People are extremely good at rationalizing.

As opposed to C? WTF?

Typo. Top 5% is 188k according to your link.

It really seems like one game to me. It's already lasted longer than I expected.

True, but the guy who is seeking attention this way probably needs some attention.

GOUSes? I don't think they exist.

We have this same stupid story recycled every week.

There are thousands of years of substantiation. And the alternative is that no one will want anything. I don't agree with doom & gloom on this point.

No ragrets