Close enough?

Good unit tests. Remember, just as there's good code and bad code, there's good unit tests, and there's bad unit tests.

For anyone who's unfamiliar with this, and is curious, Greenpeace has a Guide to Greener Electronics.

[Greenpeace rep Casey Harrel] said in a Kotaku interview, that Nintendo (as Kotaku writes, "barely even attempt to submit, or make available, the information Greenpeace require to make accurate judgements." According to Casey (I think; Kotaku suddenly uses the name Corey): "Nintendo consistently scores the poorest on our Guide to Greener Electronics primarily because they donâ(TM)t submit, nor have any publicly available information, on over half the criteria that we use to assess company performance on the Guide."

In other words, Nintendo's "worst environmental record" is the equivalent of a database null. It's not "the worst", it's "unknown".

For the information Nintendo does put out, Greenpeace's rep does note, "those that they do have answers for, are quite poor."

In a response, Nintendo says, "We would like to assure customers that we take our environmental responsibilities seriously and are rigorous in our commitment to comply with all relevant laws relating to environmental and product safety, including avoiding the use of dangerous substances in our manufacturing processes and ensuring the safe disposal and recycling of materials."

Whether one loves or hates a company, it's a bit difficult to fault their abysmal environmental record just because they didn't fill out a third party company's survey.

Disclaimer: I'm a rational Nintendo fanboy. I love their products, but I can criticize Nintendo and their products as well.

I've had two monitors for over a year now, and KDE's always recognized if I unplug one and plug one back in. It always remembers and restores my configuration. No messing with xorg.conf (I don't even have an xorg.conf file), and no playing RandR, twinview, etc.

I have no doubt that there are issues out there, but multiple monitors works flawlessly with my one video card and two matching monitors on KDE 4.9. But, as I say, I've only had two monitors for about a year or so, meaning I can't speaking for the years before then.

I wondered this, too, so I did a Google search, and found this story: "The villain leaves that stop trains"

It's that time of year again, the season of mellow autumn tints - and those leaves on the line which will soon bring chaos to rail commuters.

Martin Buckland, of the environmental consultancy ADAS, who is vegetation adviser to Railtrack, is in no doubt: "There are six species of trees which cause most trouble and they are the ones we are targeting." Together or individually, says Mr Buckland, the Sinister Six produce the seemingly impermeable track coating which scientific analysis has identified as "insoluble, lignified cellulostic material containing glue-like proteins and other protoplastic compounds."

"Between mid-October and mid-November it's these trees that will make life difficult." Mr Buckland profiles the culprits and gives his own "squidge rating".

The article finishes with a listing of the "Sinister Six": Ash, Horse Chestnut, Lime, Sycamore, Poplar, and Sweet Chestnut.

Check into the Nook Simple Touch with GlowLight. I haven't used it myself (it was announced a week or two after I bought the Simple Touch). Reviews generally praise it. In practice it's probably similar to a back-light, and it can be turned on and off, and I believe I've read the brightness is adjustable.

I have an older reader (Boox) which has the screen issue you're referring to. My Simple Touch does a black screen fill every six page turns, but it's quite fast, and may be more tolerable. (The Simple Touch has an eInk Pearl display, a Kindle or other reader with the same display probably rate of screen refresh and speed.)

The Simple Touch uses a touch screen (alongside page-turn buttons). I don't know if any Kindles do. (As much as I like Amazon, I went the Nook route due to epub support, so I'm not familiar with the latest Kindle releases.)

I've never used a smartphone, and I've only handled a tablet long enough to set one up for someone else, so I can't compare the reading experience with them. I do find eInk easier on my eyes. (Computer monitors are better for skimming than reading for me.)

The Simple Touch does have issues where the touch screen doesn't seem to be calibrated well enough, and where tapping on the screen to bring up the dictionary doesn't do anything. It's by no means perfect.

On the vendor tie-in part, I do buy books through Barnes & Noble, but I strip the DRM off before loading them onto the Nook, which makes them essentially non-vendor books as far as the Nook is concerned. However, that's not the same as library loans. I've never looked into library loan support for the Nook, so I can't comment on that one.

One of the photos on his Flickr account.

His blog post about this one and others.

For those who, like I, were curious, here is an article about chicken with teeth:

Mutant Chicken Grows Alligatorlike Teeth.

Some interesting lines:

... Matthew Harris of the University of Wisconsin noticed that the beak of a mutant chicken embryo he was examining had fallen off. Upon closer examination of the snubbed beak, he found tiny bumps and protuberances along its edge that looked like teeth--alligator teeth to be specific.

The mutant chickens Harris studied bear a recessive trait dubbed talpid. This trait is lethal, meaning that such mutants are never born, but some incubate in eggs as long as 18 days.

... a chicken's underlying ability to grow teeth derives from a common ancestor with alligators--archosaurs--that is more recent than the one linking birds and mammals. Nevertheless, the underlying genetic mechanism that produces teeth in mice, alligators and mutant chickens remains the same.

Exactly how the mutation causes the chickens to sprout teeth is unknown, Fallon notes, but a similar effect can be produced in normal chickens. Harris proved this by engineering a virus to mimic the molecular signals of the mutation and caused normal chickens to briefly develop teeth that were then reabsorbed into the beak.

Google gives me a bunch of .ws domain web sites with that search, but nothing about WS-*.[1] Including -inurl:.ws helps, but only very little.

A search for WS-* oauth returns more relevant results.

Bing (which I don't use as Google usually gives me more useful results) on a search of "ws-*" has "List of web service specifications - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" as the fourth result.

Both Bing and Google give useful suggestions in the dropdown when typing "ws-*" into the search box.

[1] Google results will of course vary by user's location.

U.S. Patent No. 7,945,653 — “Tagging digital media” – Filed on October 11, 2006, and granted May 17, 2011.

Abstract:

A method for tagging digital media is described. The method includes selecting a digital media and selecting region within the digital media. The method may further include associating a person or entity with the selected region and sending a notification of the association the person or entity or a different person or entity. The method may further include sending advertising with the notification.

I gather this is the one that the Slashdot-linked article refers to regarding Flickr. Bear in mind, while adding descriptions to regions was in Flickr at least by mid-2005 (when I joined), and tagging has been available, tagging a region came much later with the ability to tag users by region in a photo. Of course, this is a natural extension/evolution of what Flickr already had. I hope Flickr doesn't become a casualty in Yahoo! and Facebook's pantent war.

"Derail" is the perfect word for it. The same thing happens to me. It's like there's a sudden and abrupt shift in the meaning of the sentence when (for example) there's a "your" when it should be a "you're". I have to start over and force myself to read the "your" as "you are", and even then I tend to get derailed a second time in the same place. If that happens in a second location in the writing, my mind starts to have trouble following what's being written, so after the third location of such an error, I have to give up and go read something else instead.

I used to be a vocal Grammar Nazi among people I'd instant message with when they'd make such mistakes, but too many people said "I don't care if I use it wrong"...

The nice thing about Wikipedia is that if I find a spelling or grammar mistake, it's easy enough to fix.

(Here's hoping I didn't make any typing errors in this comment!)

Is Chrome any better in this regard? Honest question. I've heard others talk about it having a rapid release schedule (before Firefox moved to one). And how do Chrome and Firefox compare on UI changes per release?

My mother uses Facebook and plays Bejeweled on it. Recently, there are massive lag times of a few minutes for some actions, such as sharing points. This lag isn't there with Firefox, and many of my mother's friends who play use Chrome. I installed Firefox on my mother's laptop, from this page here, but apparently that is the version four installer, and Firefox is nearing its version six release...

Rather than trying to customize Firefox 4 to look like Firefox 3 on my mother's PC, I told her the user interface (I gestured to the top area of Firefox we had open on her PC) would look a little different. It shouldn't affect anything my mother does to have the interface look a little different. Thanks to Firefox's interface becoming more Chrome-like, if Chrome is any better with memory use than Firefox, the day might come when I'm installing Chrome rather than Firefox for my mother.

Says the article:

They simply logged on to the part of the group's site reserved for credit card customers - and substituted their account numbers which appeared in the browser's address bar with other numbers.

It allowed them to leapfrog into the accounts of other customers - with an automatic computer programme letting them repeat the trick tens of thousands of times.

To be fair, the article didn't state what the expert was an expert of. But I thought the same as the grandparent, and will be forwarding the article to co-workers so they can get a laugh from it.

Personally, I wonder how many people "looked around" at other accounts without looking suspicious in Citigroup's logs.