Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Need to carbon date this article... (Score 1) 108

Along with the complication of modern organisms living on abnormally low-14C carbon sources. Organisms living on oil/ tar seeps ; organisms living on carbonates and sulphates from salt domes.

A known type of problem, which is why raw radiocarbon dates need careful interpretation to get back to absolute dates.

Comment Re:Uhmmmm (Score 1) 620

Pen and paper?

OK. I think I can top that.

My workplace left the shipyard in 2012 and is currently in another shipyard having some modifications done which include extending an Archimedian Screw system so debris can be taken to offloading stations at port or starboard.

That's 3000 year old tech, or pretty close.

Paper (papyrus) probably wins, but "pens" as in quill pens are I think somewhat younger.

Comment Re:Birds are not living dinosaurs, (Score 1) 47

Crocodilians (crocs and alligators), testudinid (turtles and tortoises), dinosaurs (including their minor group of birds), are all archosaurs, along with some extinct groups like mosasaurs. Lizards and snakes are on a different lineage. I forget where the pterosaurs fit in.

"Reptile" is a taxonomic bucket list. Best avoided.

Mammals are more closely related to the archosaurs than the lizards.

Comment Re:I can tell you what will happen ... (Score 1) 265

200,000 floaters, eh? That's a pretty good score, and higher than I'd generally expected for the expected Cascadia quake. But I still think that for the first megadeath quake, you're still probably looking at the Ganges plain. which is as badly overdue as Cascadia, but has much poorer building codes, infrastructure resilience, enforcement of building codes, and more aggressive microbiology.

Comment Re:Coral dies all the time (Score 1) 167

I work out in the real world and have spent about 8 months overall living and working on a coral reef, out observing every couple of days. That's probably more time than your collection of aquarium shop staff added together. I note that you don't claim to bring any field experience to the discussion.

As we say at work, in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. And then we go and show the theoreticians that their theories are incomplete representations of reality.

Comment Re:Sounds like they don't get it at all (Score 1) 202

Nobody sane "goes to Africa" to get their own supply of rhino horn. There's a well-established black market into which end users tap, and locally-based poachers supply. And every pair of hands along the way ramps up the price. If it's a factor of 2 every step of the way (typical for markets), then a poacher 10 steps from the end market may only receive a few hundred dollars for shooting a rhino and hacking off the horn.

The object of this exercise is to wreck "trust" at each stage of the pipeline, to the point that it is not economically attractive for the poachers to do the "hunt and kill a rhino" step. If it bankrupts intermediate dealers, that's an side benefit.

I'm by no means convinced it will work It's an interesting idea, probably worth following; but whether it works, fast enough, is a more open question.

Of course, if they could incorporate some horrible diseases with the rhino fake, so the end customers died, painfully and with obvious blue buboes, that would be even better. But that might trouble some people's ethics.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...