That's pretty much the former of Lake I'd envisioned. The ground level would hardly have been changed by the lining of the bed (around 8 million tonnes of soil per metre change). Whether they'd actually line it
.... I don't know. Big job for what benefit. The berms (EN_US = levees ?) would be about 12km long by 14sq.m per 1m of height (I allow a 10m roadway and 1:4 soft banks)... I make that 168000 cu.m of soil per metre of berm height. Building storage lakes ON a surface is hugely easier than digging INTO a surface. To dig in by 1m you need to move 5,000,000 cu.m of soil; to build up berms to 1m height you need to move 168,000 cu.m
(I don't do this for a living. But when we've had operational issues I've had to do this sort of ball park to determine if we need to mobilizations another 1 or 2 earth moving machines to site, and operators. Before doing the numbers, I was sure of the answer. )
To return to the original point, the storage pond will have been built ON the flood plain, and when full it WILL have pushed it's base DOWN into the flood plain. So the base of the storage lake will be at or below the flood level of the river. And that makes it pretty hard for it to dry out (this being temperate Europe, not a desert somewhere). Unless someone deliberately disturbs the lake, it is unlikely to dry out for a substantial time. The area has more urgent problems.
There is an alternative way of arriving at the construction decisions above. Start to dig your pit: it starts to fill with water : you pump and continue to dig : the hole continues to fill with water. Joy and happiness do not follow...