Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:What problem does it solve? (Score 4, Interesting) 210

The boot sector issue has already been solved by most BIOS by (optionally, under user control in the BIOS configuration) preventing writes to the sector. The only time you need to unlock it is when you want to update the bootloader (relatively rare). I'm still at a loss for the value-add presented by secure boot.

Comment Increase the installation fee (Score 2) 327

At $1000 per installation, they would get about $120B for 120M households; close enough to start. I would gladly pay a $1000 start-up fee for symmetrical 1Gbps/service. From other reports, Google is charging $70/month, with an operating cost of $5/month. As the early adopters start to accumulate, the revenue stream will offset the cost for the periodically lowered installation charge to increase penetration.

Establish a nation-wide signup. Require a credit card (Google Wallet) for signup; they won't be charged, but they'll separate the wheat from the chaff. Crunch the data to find the highest population density signups and start build-out in those areas. Provide near-realtime online updates on build-out area priority. This lets those interested in an area act as promoters / ambassadors to increase signups, and raise their area's priority. Like the first cities selected, let people compete - providing free word of mouth advertising in the process.

And don't forget the other side of the equation; offer servers reasonably priced 100Gb local Google data center / site interconnects to keep the on-net customers interested and happy.

Comment Not so fast (Score 5, Interesting) 423

I've bought a dozen retail DVD players (standalone and PC) over the years, each of which came with a license either in the form of internal firmware or standalone software. I have two DVD drives still in use, both in Linux PCs. I should have plenty of licenses - if that's what they in fact are. The idea that I can hold a dozen licenses and yet not be authorized to play legally obtained content on two surviving drives because someone in the MPAA doesn't like my completely legal operating system is an abomination of logic, reason, and ethics.

Comment Stop doing business with them (Score 1) 419

"People are still getting used to the notion that unlimited data plans are dead and gone for their smartphones. The option wasn't even offered for tablets. Now, we're beginning to see the eradication of the unlimited data plan in our broadband lines, such as cable and DSL connections."

My cable company (Optonline) offers unlimited, uncapped, unthrottled bandwidth. That doesn't mean that there aren't periods of contention, but it's not the ISP slowing down the service. We also switched to Republic Wireless, which offers unlimited, uncapped, unthrottled voice, text, and data (yes, even cellular data) for $19/month. They are still in beta, but we've been happy with the service. If your service providers aren't offering these services, switch. If you can't switch in your area, complain to your township, county, and state to bring in competitive services.

The thing is, real unlimited shifts the burden to you, and that's a responsibility that many people can't handle. It's like being on the LAN at the office; if someone is monopolizing the bandwidth, you know it. You (or the admins) will have a chat with them about playing nice. As long as everyone plays nice, you can get the bandwidth you need, when you need it. Throttling comes in when people refuse to play nice, and have to be forced.

Even back in the old landline telephone days when local calls were free, some people would leave the phone off the hook for days / weeks / months. Maximum call lengths had to be instituted as a result. Most people never hit the limit, and never even knew they existed. When people can't play nice, we can't have nice things.

Comment Re:Extensions (Score 1) 432

Some distributions, like Fedora, package the extensions for installation via the normal package management. The web site is generic, which is why I pointed there. There are third party repositories as well. These integrate into the standard maintenance processes. For example, on my Fedora system, I've installed:

gnome-tweak-tool-3.4.0.1-2.fc17.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-user-theme-3.4.0-1.fc17.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-common-3.4.0-1.fc17.noarch
gnome-shell-frippery-0.4.1-1.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-workspace-indicator-3.4.0-1.fc17.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-apps-menu-3.4.0-1.fc17.noarch

This allows me to customize the environment to my personal preferences, which are likely different from yours. Having a common stable base with just the needed additional functionality (if any) is a much saner idea than putting everything that anyone can think of into the base, and then having to maintain that complex mess.

Comment Re:Extensions (Score 1) 432

But the gnome team said at the start that support for extentions would be removed.

They've set up a gnome web page for extensions, so I doubt they are going away. This statement at the site should clarify:

Since extensions are created outside of the normal GNOME design and development process, they are supported by their authors, rather than by the GNOME community. Some features first implemented as extensions might find their way into future versions of GNOME.

Comment Re:Extensions (Score 1) 432

I don't want to think where I put my windows. I know my personal browser sessions are on 3, along with any game I might be playing, my E-mail and other contact managers are on 1, and my database interface and Eclipse are running on 2.

When I want to save a window for later, I toss it over to 4.

I shouldn't have to think about it. That's how proper organization works.

Imagine for a moment if your clothing drawers automatically created and deleted drawers so you had to figure out where you'd put something, and if you took the last sock out of the sock drawer, the shirt drawer wouldn't be where you expected it. We use metaphors on desktops to help users organize their data, including the folder system. Making those metaphors less realistic kills their ability to use them for organization.

If that's the workflow you prefer, then use the static workspaces extension. You can easily turn extensions on and off and make other changes with the gnome tweak tool GUI.

Slashdot Top Deals

1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.

Working...