Comment sosumi (Score 3, Funny) 743
</div> <!--/sosumi--><p class="statement">On 25 October 2012, Apple Inc. published a statement on its UK website in relation to Samsung's Galaxy tablet computers. [
... ]
</div> <!--/sosumi--><p class="statement">On 25 October 2012, Apple Inc. published a statement on its UK website in relation to Samsung's Galaxy tablet computers. [
... ]
Developers don't choose when to release software, it's management. Think you need to do more testing but management thinks it looks ready? It's out the door and you cant do anything to stop them. Testing is just as important as coding and the developers dont do all the testing, it's usually outsourced.
Bottom line: if a company doesn't do it's due diligence then yes, they should be responsible for putting out bad software.
now that they have decent hands, we will have robots stealing our cereal. they're always after me lucky charms.
So "click harder" will be a valid solution, now, so that the computer can finally understand urgency.
How long until someone makes a window manager that allows pressure to control the priority of a window's process?
That sounds terrible. Call the GNOME developers!
But I get to be the second horseman, you insensitive clod!
anyone who plays games that use EA's "always connected" DRM are going to be screwed shortly.
Google's filing (PDF) affirmed that they have not paid media for articles or done any quid pro quo in exchange for coverage. However, they acknowledged that many people receive money from Google through other means (the company's philanthropy, ad business, etc.), and asked the judge if he wanted further details about those instances.
stupid Google, dont you know that as a corporation you are supposed to deny and impede any attempt to get information about what you've done and tie it up in court for years? just look at Oracle, they deny everything until the bitter end and fight tooth and nail to budge an inch on any information at all. i mean, volunteering information? for shame!
this "don't be evil" stuff is really getting in the way of becoming a well adjusted sociopathic corporation.
I wanted to send a note that by the end of the day today, OnLive as an entity will no longer exist.
but corporations are people too! if you cause them to stop existing then that is MURDER!
just add that anyone that tries to enforce their patent automatically invalidates said patent.
problem solved!
Cumulonimbus or GTFO.
It's been gradual but i think we can say it's official that The Big Apple has become The Big Fuck You.
You have obscene pricing, crooked cops, they completely ignoring everything bad going down on Wall Street (and their major cocaine habit), they are a nanny city telling you that you cant have a large soda and now they are going Big Brother on everyone (that isn't part of the government).
Corporations really dont give a damn about what people do so long as they keep getting money from them. However, governments are just itching to break out the swat team for a double parked car.
I think it's time to blow the bridges and drag it out to sea with all the vermin on it.
Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money bags. -- Sidney Paternoster, "The Folly of the Wise"