Could you primitive screwheads stop dropping quotes?

we have to get over the social issue first.

There is no social issue, there is only a propaganda issue. People have been told over and over that nuclear is the ultimate evil thing. They just need some counterbalancing facts about how it can be safe and that in fact it's safer than coal... then start by replacing coal plants with small really well contained nuclear plants, and expand from there.

If speech is money, he's spending like a drunken sailor.

How about you go outside, look around, and see if anyone is selling a sarcasm detector?

Sounds like an excuse to me.
You don't need approval to build prototypes.
If you can should you can make a reliable, well functioning, person hearing aid cheaper, you can get investors.

http://www.caithnesswindfarms....

the upper atmosphere is not getting warmer. Only the lower atmosphere is warming. In fact, the upper atmosphere is cooling.

Clouds generally appear below 18 kilometers.
.

My apologies, I was doing video stuff over the weekend.

I would prefer we built giant 'shields' be tween us and the sun so that we can move them if need be.
I don't want to spray anything into the atmosphere.

Really, if we could figure out how plants work so efficiently on a the molecular level to get CO2 and convert it to sugar, O, and H we could solve this issue..

But, yeah 4 Gen nuclear plants need to be built, and ran by the government, not private industry.
  Remove the profit and bonus motivation, and people won't try to find ways to skirt, or delay on maintenance so they get a bigger bonus.
Charge cost plus 1 cent a KWh.

I would built the first ones near coal plants.
I would also take a 20x20 mile square of real estate in Arizona or New Mexico, and create a multi technology solar power plant and power a nearby city. Use it as RnD so private companies can replicate it.

Yes, a politician coming forward and explaining we are having a climate problem is alarmist.
All people like you did is make it a nearly untenable topic for politicians becasue ass wipe like you come out and tlak about non sequitors and use it to rub you partisan dick all over the place.

If anything, his alarm was loud enough.

No one called for that, and when ever someone brings up global cooling, it's guaranteed they don't know what global climate change is.
Hint: There is more particulate matter in the air; which reflects some sunlight. There is also CO2(and other) green house gasses that traps the energy.
The energy trapped is greater the the energy lost from sun lighting reflection

Also, we are in an ice age.

yes.
One was random ignorant circumstance, the other a planned way to go forward and start correcting it.

Since you're not going to bother scrolling back up the page to see what I mean, I'll go ahead and say it - that comment was in response to your strawman about Creationists.

That statement was from you but you attempted to imply that it was from me.

That is a straw man.

Pointing out that Jenny McCarthy and Creationists BOTH ignore scientific evidence is not a straw man.

You were the one who started talking about "morons". Let me quote you and provide a link:

No, I mean like people who "point out" the evidence for evolution by looking at Creationists and saying things like, "goddamn but you're a moron! How is it that you're allowed to breed? Someone should put you down for the good of society!"

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5028117&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=46749487

That is your comment and that is you making a straw man about "moron" claims.

Look, Brah, I don't care what you think about feelings, or damage, or strawmen, or whatever.

Except that you do and that has been your entire argument. I need to be nicer about pointing out that some people ignore all the scientific evidence that contradicts them. Then you go off on a straw man.

Measles does not care about feelings.

millions of years, pressure, and plate tectonics.
.

Someone is upset that fact show him to be wrong.
What northers state had slavery after 1812?(CW was in 1865)

"The war wasn't the grand moral gesture ignorant shitheads like you love to wank over. "
The only thing I wank over is facts. The fact is, the South went to war becasue they wanted to enslave human beings.
They ALSO wanted to force other state to do what they said, AND tried to get federal legislation to make it so northern states couldn't have there own laws about what makes a person free.

You were clearly brainwashed as a child. I suppose you cal slaves 'servants' and 'guest' as well.

  ignorant shitheads
ignorant? I just listed a bunch of facts about the war. Facts that show clearly it was about slavery. So, no, you are ignorant.

I can be a shit head, but usually only to people like you that deserve exactly zero respect.

" The Northern majority didn't remotely care enough about slavery to fight a war."
so the fact that every document from both sides says otherwise doesn't matter?