Comment Re:OMG! (Score 2) 551
And unlike Crimea, Iraq committed hundreds of acts of war against the US before it acted.
Any that occurred outside of Iraq, against the actual United States?
As to Iraq, maybe you could explain to me why you think ordinary Iraqis would want to continue being subjected to Saddam's government?
Ask the 100,000+ civilians we killed directly as collateral damage? Or the 500,000+ that died as indirect results of the war (e.g. not getting health care due to the city being in flames)?
That was the effect of the war on "ordinary Iraqi's".
Saddam, as bad as he was, had gotten steadily -less- brutal as a dictator as time went on. He was not at all escalating the violence against his own citizens -- for an example of that see Syria, where we aren't involved. (Funny that.)
If we were going to invade Iraq "for the good of its own people", we should have done it in the 80s. And if we were going to pick a place to "save from it self" in 2003, there are places far worse than Iraq.
The US invaded Afghanistan in a legitimate act of self defense after a series of attacks on diplomatic posts and military units culminating in the 9/11 attacks.
That's pretty much ridiculous on its face. Next time a Canadian thug mugs a politician will the US invade Canada in a legitimate act of self defense too?
The US used 9/11 and other incidents as an excuse to invade; but there was never any existential threat to the United States that mandated it. Nor was there any real evidence that Afghanistan posed a significant threat of any kind that couldn't have been managed entirely within our own borders.