That's not a lie detector, it's an empathy detector. Tyrell thought he could give androids empathy by giving them memories, but he was mistaken.

No. Polygraphs measure your involuntary responses. Lying is stressful. Lying to people trying to tell if you're lying even more so. If you believe it, you'll pass the polygraph just fine.

I did not say "All you have to do is." I said "That sounds easy to fix", and it is. Reparenting a process to init is a common idiom (fork + setsid, see `man 2 setsid`). (x)inetd is therefore capable of doing it, it just did not because of the constraints at the time.

I am well aware of modern design patterns, but thank you. Dependency resolution during startup is a great idea, but it is also something that could be saved statically (which is _exactly_ what the management people built around init did) because the startup resolution order only changes when something is added or removed from init. So, somehow, for decades, we got by with the "worse" approach.

I don't see how one would need to install X and ghostscript to get a tty, shell, and ls, unless one was using a distribution build by incompetents.

You expect the government to uphold a civil contract that charges the government $100,000 in order for the government to do its job enforcing the laws the government passed?

Wow.

That sounds like an easily-surmountable technical problem that would leave init simple and delegate this bit to a network-specific thing.

Also, at that point it's not really called a daemon anymore, it's just a program. It's like a CGI script, but for any incoming network connection.

You misinterpret me. Something like inetd would solve this problem without systemd. So whatever happened to (x)inetd?

Init starts a daemon that watches for the event. This is how inetd worked. Whatever happened to that?

And when the public sees how seriously errors of this nature are treated, it may help turn a negative (a bunch of leaked waste) into a positive (but we've got procedures in place to deal with and ensure the issue does not happen again). Anyone remember Deepwater Horizon anymore?

And that is all this is.

Freenet has had it for even longer.

I would've killed someone for that thing when I was 7. And I'm only 30 years old.

It's because, turns out, the real estate the company bought is a more stable stream of income than the retail company itself. The company ebbs and flows at a rate related to the human attention span, but the world is not going to be getting bigger any time soon...

The problem with American TV is the average American

a DNN is only interested in the parts of an object that most distinguish it from others.

So it needs to learn that these exact images are tricks being played on it, so it can safely ignore it. This is exactly what machine learning is. What's the story?

Pushing Germany to collapse after WW1 was an incredible success! We need more successes like that!