Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Does it know if I've been bad or good? (Score 1) 185

...Given the trajectory of technology and how ubiquitous it becomes over time, what starts out as optional turns into mandatory. Same thing with all these health monitoring devices. Somehow they will be used to fuck you over for engaging in bad behavior...

We can only hope that, as has largely happened with DRM, technology will help to address the problems it's being used to create. I can imagine a whole industry, (much of it underground), devoted to taking back the privacy that is being stolen. Of course, for that to happen, an awful lot of sheeple out there are going to have to stop bleating and start shouting. I'm not holding my breath though....

Comment Re:There can be no defense of this. (Score 1) 184

...I don't see why, if you were trying to stop a serious threat, spies shouldn't be able to monitor these communications in principle, with some clear restrictions:
1/ If the information gathered by spying was specifically barred from being used in court

This would still allow for 'fruits of the poison tree' attacks in court, assumin the Brit system has this concept.

2/ If additional authority had to be granted by the judiciary for the act
3/ If there were clear checks and balances in place to deal with abuse.

I have absolutely NO trust in a governent and judiciary that would allow such eavesdropping in the first place, to use "additional authority" wisely and fairly, nor to put in plae and maintain "checks and balances" with any integrity. Once exceptions like this are allowed, it's a steep slippery slope towards totalitarianism.

Totally off topic for a moment, is it just me, or is Dice finally starting to slip Beta crap into the interface in an attempted 'stealth attack'? All of a sudden commenting seems a lot more awkward than it used to.

Submission + - Ft. Lauderdale Men Charged for Feeding the Homeless

jenningsthecat writes: 90-year-old Fort Lauderdale resident Arnold Abbott and two local pastors were charged on Sunday with "feeding the homeless in public". Abbott was told by police to "drop that plate right now" when he was attempting to distribute food. The three men were charged under a new city ordinance banning public food sharing, and face up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine. The ordinance "limits where outdoor feeding sites can be located, requires the permission of property owners and says the groups have to provide portable toilets".

Mayor Jack Seiler was quoted as saying "Just because of media attention we don't stop enforcing the law. We enforce the laws here in Fort Lauderdale". He believes that "Providing them with a meal and keeping them in that cycle on the street is not productive."

Really, I have no words for this other than "heartless jackbooted fuckwits".

Comment Digital Landlord? (Score 1) 42

FTA

The ruling defined Facebook as a "digital landlord".

Last time I checked, landlords charge tenants money. Since Facebook users don't pay for the service in any recognized currency, (and somehow I doubt privacy is recognized as a barterable thing), how can Facebook be a landlord?

The attempt to treat Facebook servers as the equivalent of physical premises is disturbing. Judicial over-reach, much?

Comment Pot meets Kettle (Score 1) 228

However much they [tech companies] may dislike it, they have become the command and control networks of choice for terrorists and criminals, who find their services as transformational as the rest of us... Mr. Hannigan said that smartphone and other mobile technologies increased the opportunities for terrorist activity to be concealed...

I agree fully. Things such as social media and cell phones are priceless boons to those governments which aggressively meddle in the affairs of other nations while persistently spying on their own citizens. It's good to see Mr. Hannigan admitting on behalf of his country how "transformational" the latest technology has been for him and his masters.

People and countries that complain about the sword cutting both ways, should just stop living by the sword.

Comment Re:Underwater will face the same challenges as Tid (Score 1) 216

Stray electrical current... Metal parts... Salt water... What could go wrong? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G... Oh, yeah...

As per the Wikipedia article you linked to, ensuring the metals that are in contact with or close proximity to each other have the same or similar anodic indices will largely address that problem. (That's why copper plumbing pipes are secured to joists by copper clamps; if they wer steel the pipes might eventually develop holes at the contact points).

I proposed either gold or platinum electrodes because they are the metals most resistant to corrosion. And I proposed Alternating Current because the periodic reversal negates any stripping / deposition effects of current flow. That's why electroplating, (and hydrolysis), use Direct Currrent - AC simply won't work for those purposes.

(In fact, some vaporizers available at the drug store don't have heating elements per se - just two strips of metal connected to the mains voltage and immersed in the water. They won't even work with distilled water, as it doesn't conduct electricity).

Comment Re:Underwater will face the same challenges as Tid (Score 4, Interesting) 216

The ocean is teaming with life and it will literally grow on anything. What do you do when the entire underwater "windmill" is covered in barnacles? Every underwater generation scheme is toasted by the life problem.

Cover every bit of metal with an insulating coating, then print, deposit, or laminate gold or platinum electrodes on the surfaces. Connect 'odd' electrodes in one branch of a circuit, 'even' electrodes in another, than apply an alternating voltage between them. The seawater completes the circuit. Unless a life form lands on the metal - then IT completes the circuit. I suspect most life forms will not like a continuous alternating current passing through them, and will 'move to greener pastures". Overall generating efficiency will be reduced, but probably not as much as it would be by barnacles, etc.

I'm not a marine biologist and I don't know if this would work - just tossing the idea out there.

Comment Re:Every time I hear the word 'lobbyist' I feel si (Score 1) 485

Outlawing lobbying would actually be bad for democracy overall. Lobbyists are a vehicle in which an interest communicates the needs of that interest to an elected official... lobbying in general is a good thing; it is a tool of democracy that enables communication between the State and the people. Like any tool, it can be used appropriately or inappropriately. The key is to create regulation that discourages inappropriate use, not throw out the tool entirely.

True - but then, how to address the disparities that the very nature of lobbying introduces? As I mentioned in a reply above, people working two or three jobs or otherwise spending every waking hour just keeping their lives together have no practical means of hiring a lobbyist; although they might manage a letter or an email, which without the 'amplifying' effect of a lobbyist will simply be ignored. As far as I can see, "inappropriate use" is built into the very mechanism of lobbying. I don't have any ideas right now for an alternative; but for ideas to come forward I think it's first necessary to widely acknowledge that the existing mechanism is broken, probably at the design level.

And you can't outlaw lobbying from corporations, because the private sector is the engine of economic creation; it creates jobs for people and better products that improve people's lives etc. Again, yes, as a tool it can be misused, but removing the primary form of communication between the State and the economy is just a stupid idea.

The private sector can't be "an engine of economic creation" without the people it employs - and the best interests of those people are often diametrically opposed to what the directors and shareholders of corporations see as their own best interests. An uncritical and submissive position with respect to the private sector is a major contributor to the wealth concentration that is destroying the middle class. Corporatocracy != meritocracy.

Comment Re:Every time I hear the word 'lobbyist' I feel si (Score 2) 485

Asking one person to talk to your representative on behalf of a bunch of you IS NOT CIRCUMVENTING DEMOCRACY. It's using your damn head.

You DO have a valid point. But what about all those people who don't have the time to even get together with like-minded individuals, much less the money to pay a representative to lobby on their behalf? Working single mothers, and people holding down two or three jobs spend a lot of their lives in survival mode. The institution of lobbying effectively makes political change either a rich man's sport or the province of revolutionaries.

Then there are all the sub-rosa deals made during lobbying - "My client will or won't build, (or close), a factory in your district, depending on how you vote", and the like.

How does this NOT subvert democracy?

Comment Re:Good (Score 1) 104

I don't like fracking. It overextends fossil fuel dependency when we need stronger economic incentives to get off them for our long term needs. But if it does happen, I don't want this kind of risk from it.

I know - let's ship all the frackers and their equipment and their trade secrets to China! Then at least the havoc those bastards wreak won't be in this part of the world. Just in the tradition of shipping our problems to other countries, y'understand...

Comment Every time I hear the word 'lobbyist' I feel sick (Score 5, Interesting) 485

The practice of paid lobbying ought to be outlawed altogether, with long prison terms in store for those who break that law. After that law is in place, anyone who formerly worked in the lobbying "industry", (and how odious to use that word in connection with lobbyists), would be forbidden forever from seeking public office or working for the government as either an employee or as a contractor.

It's time to outlaw the purchase of favourable legislation altogether. In fact, it's long past time to aggressively outlaw ANY circumvention of democracy. Yeah, I know it isn't going to happen - but I can dream...

Comment Split the difference (Score 1) 613

This Spring, move the clocks forward by one-half hour, then LEAVE THEM THERE ALL YEAR!!! I hate the time change - it messes me up for days, sometimes even a week or more.

If the powers that be feel the need to dick around with time, they could at least do something useful by making 24 hour time and ISO date-time format truly universal. No more "is that AM or PM?", and no more confusion over whether 11/06/14 refers to the eleventh day of June or the sixth day of November. (And in that same spirit of good sense maybe the folks responsible for the GTK file chooser could get rid of that fscking "Today" and "Yesterday" BS).

Submission + - The Climate-Change Solution No One Will Talk About

HughPickens.com writes: Jason Plautz writes at The Atlantic that the more the world's population rises, the greater the strain on dwindling resources and the greater the impact on the environment. "And yet the climate-change benefits of family planning have been largely absent from any climate-change or family-planning policy discussions," says Jason Bremner of the Population Reference Bureau. Even as the population passes 7.2 billion and is projected by the United Nations to reach 10.9 billion by the end of the century, policymakers have been unable—or unwilling—to discuss population in tandem with climate change. Why? Because "talking about population control requires walking a tightrope:," writes Plautz. "It can all too easily sound like a developed world leader telling people in the developing world that they should stop having children—especially because much of the population boom is coming from regions like sub-Saharan Africa." Just look at what happened to Hillary Clinton in 2009, when as secretary of State she acknowledged the overpopulation issue during a discussion with Indian environment minister Jairam Ramesh. Clinton praised another panelist for noting "that it's rather odd to talk about climate change and what we must do to stop and prevent the ill effects without talking about population and family planning."

A 2010 study looked at the link between policies that help women plan pregnancies and family size and global emissions. The researchers predicted that lower population growth could provide benefits equivalent to between 16 and 29 percent of the emissions reduction needed to avoid a 2 degrees Celsius warming by 2050, the warning line set by international scientists. But the benefits also come through easing the reduced resources that could result from climate change. The U.N. IPCC report notes the potential for climate-related food shortages, with fish catches falling anywhere from 40 to 60 percent and wheat and maize taking a hit, as well as extreme droughts. With resources already stretched in some areas, the IPCC laid out the potential for famine, water shortages and pestilence. Still, the link remains a "very sensitive topic," says Karen Hardee, "At the global policy level you can't touch population but what's been heartening is that over the last few years it's not just us, but people from the countries themselves talking about this."

Comment What middle class? (Score 1) 331

Career colleges must be a stepping stone to the middle class.

Too bad "the middle class" is a rapidly shrinking island and the nearest stepping stones are increasingly far from its shores. With the possible exception of building trades, traditional middle class jobs are increasingly being exported, filled by poorly-paid H1B wage slaves, or eliminated altogether. The solution to these problems has little to do with college courses, (AKA 'job training', AKA 'shaping the peg to fit a non-existent hole'), and a lot to do with fixing massively unfair concentration of wealth.

Additionally, education should not be primarily about job training - it should be about producing well-rounded, creative, thoughtful, aware citizens who can solve problems and who can adapt readily to a variety of roles as required. Our society is not a production line for widgets, and it's time we stopped treating it as one.

Slashdot Top Deals

Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.

Working...