Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Phasers (Score 1) 158

C. IM really confused as to what frame of reference you are using to determine that phaser fire is slower then a bullet.

As I recall, it's not uncommon to be able to actually track the progress of the beam with the naked eye even without a high speed camera. This is true of a bullet at long range (being able to track tracer rounds, for example), but I remember doing this with phasers sometimes when guys were shooting at each other in the same room.

Comment Re:BSG chose bullets over lasers (Score 1) 158

It was the dumbest system ever.

I feel like it improves the pacing of combat. Spending half your time hiding and waiting for weapons to cooldown is kind of boring. On the other hand, it makes no sense in universe for guns to work this way. I'd like to see a compromise with thermal clips *and* weapon cooldowns. So essentially, you'll get so many free thermal refreshes in a mission (and maybe thermal clips themselves are rarer). That would encourage you to use them strategically.... but otherwise, your weapons will cool down on their own in time.

Comment Re:Osama Bin Laden (Score 1) 570

Well...Google Public Data says that our unemployment rate has doubled since 2001 (4.6% in 02/01 and 9.8%), the government had to bail out GM and Chrysler and also bailed out a number of banks. <shrug> We may not be completely sunk, but I think you could argue that the economy of the US has been critically damaged, at least.

By Osama? Why would you count from 2001? It spiked a bit shortly thereafter and then dropped for several years straight before spiking far more dramatically 2008-2009. Remind me again what it was Osama did to hurt our economy in that time frame.

Comment Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund (Score 1) 386

The cost of the PS3 and its games are right on par with the cost of a Xbox and its games. I maybe could accept this lame argument if PS3 games cost an extra $20 or something, but they don't.

According to amazon, the retail price of an equivalent PS3 unit (comparing 250 GB slim models) is 50 bucks more, or the price of about a year of XBL. So that's not technically true. But really, the relative prices are immaterial.

Sony is eating the cost of PSN in an attempt to better compete with the much Xbox Live

Yes, but that money comes from revenue they make from systems and games. You *are* paying for it. It just doesn't appear on your credit card statement every month. It's like buying a lifetime subscription to something.

(which is a much more stable, consistent service with a significant headstart over PSN--but which charges $5 a month). The only thing "subsidizing" PSN is Sony. And this security breach seems to indicate that they were trying to do it on the cheap.

Well yes, they probably were. But that doesn't mean we can't expect it to be a good service. It was advertised as a competitor to XBL with the benefit that you don't need to pay for an ongoing subscription. This was a promise they made to people who were holding that PS3 box in their hands contemplating putting down a chunk of change on gaming console. We paid for this service, we just don't pay for an ongoing subscription. In the long run, we definitely pay *more* for XBL. Maybe we should also expect more. But that's not how I look at it. If they can't provide the same service as Microsoft without charging a subscription, then charge a damn subscription. What was advertised was equivalent service, and that's what I want.

Comment Re:And this is a surprise? (Score 1) 250

less likely

That's not true at all. [...]the infection rate is still very high.

So... minor nitpick, but he didn't say it wasn't high, he said it wasn't *as* high. Are you saying that the infection rate is equivalent? I mean, by pure virtue of people looking at more porn on their home computers than work computers, I'd expect it to be lower, even if you don't account for security and firewalls and whatnot that are erected as IT practices.

Comment Re:Sure, here is your $0 refund (Score 1) 386

You get what you pay for. And since you pay, oh, NOTHING for PSN then that's what you deserve to get in compensation. Unless you're PSN Plus user or you have bought PSN games from them that you can't play offline, then STFU. This isn't Xbox Live, this is a free service that Sony generously provides.

And is a major selling point of their PS3 system, which they, last I checked, charge for. I think they charge for the games, too. Are you really trying to argue that PS3 owners have no reasonable expectation that Sony will maintain the service and continue to support their multiplayer experiences? Are you really trying to argue that Sony has no responsibility to its customers with regard to the state of PSN?

The service is part of the package, and a customer has certain expectations of that service when the package is purchased. If you purchase a Kindle, you expect you'll be able to download books to it. That's a key selling point of the Kindle. It doesn't matter that they don't charge for the continued service; that's just how the damn thing is supposed to work. The PS3 is the same way.

If you don't like it, buy an Xbox and pay them $5 a month for the privilege of what Sony gives you for free.

Last I checked, XBL is still up. Look, which way do you want it? Do you want to argue that they are equivalent services and that Sony's is better because it's free or do you want to argue that Sony's service, due to being free, should not be subject to the same expectations as XBL? You seem to want to have it both ways.

Comment Re:Oh please (Score 1) 386

Cry me a fucking river. You get your free credit protection, what more do you want for not being able to play your precious video games through a free online service?

(I presume based on the OP's inane whining that they are not paying for PSN+.)

I know what I want. I want to play my video games through an online service. I'm sick of this stupid excuse. Online multiplayer is an advertised feature and an expectation of the system. If you bought a Kindle 3G and suddenly you couldn't download any books to it for a month, do you really think "Yeah, but you don't pay extra for the 3G service" is a valid excuse?

Comment Re:FBI Too Focused On Child Porn (Score 2) 487

The person who had their card stolen was still heavily inconvenienced by the whole thing. I had my card stolen once and I felt violated. I tried to social engineer the mailing address of the purchased CDs out of an operator, but I failed. Seriously, though, I wanted to show up with a baseball bat and break some kneecaps. I only wish I had had a recourse other than letting the card company take care of it and issue a new card. They may not have wanted to press charges, but I did.

Comment Re:Bureaucrats (Score 1) 487

No, not blindly following programming. I've thought this one thru.

Evidently you haven't thought it through enough.

It's like buying Mexican pot. It might get you really nice and high. No problem, right? You paid for it and maybe it's kinda legal or you have a medical prescription or something.

Along the way,however, the Mexican drug cartels-- the people in the delivery chain-- have murdered in hideous ways almost 100,000 people, many of them guilty of only trying to resist being exploited. Some were just in the way.

Yes. And this is because there's an actual market for it. Presumably this would stop if everyone stopped buying it, yes? Well what if people stopped paying for it, but somehow managed to continue consuming it? Would have the same effect, yes? That's the point others are making.

Slashdot Top Deals

HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!

Working...