Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Posting so I can read more bytes (Score 1) 2

That happens to me too. If you find the right thing to click, you get the whole thing.

I think this is part of pudge's efforts to individually deal with L-Users. I think he has a database he can add usernames to.

But maybe I am just paranoid. But i have reason to think as i do! i am dealing with fascists.

User Journal

Journal Journal: to my newly neutral ex-friends; 1

I am a new man. I love all men, and even more so especially women. Friend me, and I confirm I will friend you back. And then you will get to be notified and read my amusing and insightful journal, and I will be notified and read your amusing and insightful journal. A win-win!

Ciao,

Mr. Confirmer

Comment Re:No story here (Score 1) 1324

pudge, as your friend, i thought i should point out some things you missed in the post you replied to:

Well, obviously other religions can't offer any ethical guidance, and exposing the kids to them will clearly cause them to hate Christianity. Better not even expose them to other thoughts! And the best place to go for that? Here in the US.

Who the hell are YOU -- or any government -- to deprive the parents of their right to make that choice? Ridicule it all you want, but it is THEIR choice.

Well, in fact it is not.

True. In Germany. (remember, pudge, there is a whole other world out there)

It is one of those areas where you have to judge personal freedom against societal needs or desires.

True. In America, if you teach your child to be the wheel-man as you snipe out the trunk of your car, you can expect society to step in. And, if the social services people come by, and realize that you are a nut case abusing your children by "educating" them, you can expect the judge to back them up.

Like deciding whether it is ok to carry weapons in public ... Different societies have different views on these issues.

True. In Germany, they see this differently than in America. (remember, pudge, there is a whole other world out there)

I like that European model in many ways. The founding fathers knew that if every farmer had a muzzzle loader, the cannon and cavalry of the monarchs and despots could not keep them in power against the will of the people. But how the hell did America get from there to automatic weaponry?

There are good reasons to make education an issue of public control. There might also good reasons to allow home-schooling.

True. And true.

Germany as a state / society has decided that it rather wants public control over where, what and when children learn. Other states like the US may handle this differently. As pointed out earlier, you don't have to send your kid to public school in Germany, there are private ones following different educational theories. You can even try to get your own school (not easy, but possible). But a child has to be in school somewhere, meaning be with other children and being exposed to ideas, material, subjects that have been agreed upon as being those that are relevant.

So, it is one of those personal rights you have to give up being a member of society. Makes sense to any German I ever talked to (I'm one myself).

Well, I see the point of the poster. It is a change from my way of thinking, but I see the internal consistency of it.

Now, let's see how you approached this whole thing...

Well, in fact it is not.

False.

It is one of those areas where you have to judge personal freedom against societal needs or desires.

False.

Like deciding whether it is ok to carry weapons in public or whether traffic is on the left or right side of the road.

The former is clear: we do have that fundamental right. The latter, not being about rights at all, is irrelevant to this discussion.

There are good reasons to make education an issue of public control.

False.

But a child has to be in school somewhere, meaning be with other children and being exposed to ideas, material, subjects that have been agreed upon as being those that are relevant.

False.

So, it is one of those personal rights you have to give up being a member of society.

False.

Governments exist to secure liberties, not to take them away. They literally have no right to do it.

Oh my, so many falses! Not a single true. How unusual to see such a monlithic position, almost like you have a pathological need to disagree.

Anyway, hope things are going well for you. You seem to be having a good time, getting out on the internets and interacting with the peoples.

Ta ta!

your friend,

pudge_confirmer

(hey, Chris, how come you don't answer my questions any more? I try to keep it down to one per post. )

Comment Re:No story here (Score 1) 1324

Seriously, as I get older, and I know fewer and fewer people without kids, I run into this view less and less.

Seriously, it may be that having children makes those people you know stupid, or it may just be something about the people you know, or the people you don't know.

Or maybe it is something else.

Logically. ;-)

Any thoughts?

your friend,

Mr. Confirmer.

Comment Re:It would be a violation of human rights when: (Score 1) 1324

Hi Chris !

This is your friend again.

I noticed your exchange:

You seem to forget that Germany has an outstanding education system and thinking you can educate your kids better is well...

Factual.

Your statement could be false if your definition of "better" disagrees with that of santax.

I can also confirm that I find your response to santax to be illogical.

I could even go so far as to speculate that you suspect or know that your definition of "better" differs from that of santax, in which case I would speculate that your response tends toward falsehood in its intent.

In any case, I wonder why you made that response.

Do you wonder?

Comment Re:Interesting blueprint - to make moh moNEY! (Score 1) 13

I asume you know something about transsexuals, so you likely know about bisexuals and asexuals and third spirit.

I suspect that these things don't often move much over life, and I think movement is not something that you always get by praying or wishing or trying... if change happens, it is for mysterious reasons, as mysterious as the reasons for the past orientation

i think people can become at peace with their orientation much more easily than they can change it, and peace is different than change.

Comment i also do not think (Score 1) 2

the wealth of a nation should be correlated, or a strong function of, the productivity of its metal mining

i think the wealth of a nation should be related to a weighted function of the happiness of its people and the happiness of all the people of the world

call me a dreamer. call me a socialist. call me a liberal. call me a man of god. please call me a cab. and don't call me a conservative.

Comment thanks (Score 1) 16

i appreciate hearing from someone who has actually thought about a topic, done some research, and has some real-life experience to offer that is relevant.

that is so rare these days

keep it up, friend

Ciao,

p_c

Comment Re:Pudge doesn't know anything (Score 1) 6

But, some people can change from conservative to liberal, and liberal to conservative, even more than once. I find that hopeful, but pudge I find less hopeful.

But I presently think his inflexibility may be the best he can do, to avoid even more cognitive dissonance than people already give him, possibly because he has attributes of a high functioning autist.

People will often find ways to overcome cognitive dissonance, but many can change to relieve it and face consequences about self image of an 'incorrect' past, or past behaviour. And, rather than suffering from cognitive dissonance upon improvement, they might actually improve, and be comfortable.

Maybe pudge can not change and be comfortable.

It makes me see him in a different light. A more Christ-like light.

Slashdot Top Deals

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...