No way. I learned while sniffing glue that no knowledge existed prior to Andreessen rolling out Mosaic in 1993.

Do you have the intellectual courage to juxtapose the two cases, and see which passes even a cursory review?
The RS drivel did not. Errors of fact were evident from the beginning.
If you've been paying attention to the better blogs (e.g. written by non-Progressive lawyers) the whole John Doe case has been building for quite a while.
It's some twisted, fascistic business, and well worthy of your time.

Kitty!

You're apparently more knowledgeable than I, yet also silent. Yet I am keenly aware of my 100% guilt in this matter. I am burdened with remorse.

You probably know that the newspaper controls the headlines, and uses them in precisely the manner you describe. The question is, given the facts, do you dispute the characterization?

We'll have to give it a few decades for facts to creep out, but if it turns out that BHO is the climax of a "soft conspiracy", and amounts to an attack on the country, I will be completely unable to register surprise.
Or maybe he's just a dickhead.
But I'm not sure he's all that substantially more evil than many others cruising at that altitude. The GOP hardly seems to miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity to set about reforming anything.

(1) She's not cruising the country in a Subaru.
(2) It's really more her status as High Priestess of Cthulhu that worries me.

This is the truest thing you've said in so long. Life is wild, and the idea that it commences when your information is complete is the height of obvious.

How would you do that, unless there were a trusted proxy running your searches?

You're a raaaaacist if you vote against Vice President Michelle Obama.

Again, and not to go picking up d_r's argument too much, he's either effective, or he's not. I think he's mostly incompetent. If true, you have to remember to blame the context where appropriate.