The issue is developing the negatives. In chemical photography, you don't just expose a piece of film to light and poof! it's a negative. You have to expose the film to light briefly, then keep it in the dark. Then you have to run it through a series of chemical baths that take the molecules of the film that were altered by the light, and "fix" them so they won't be altered by light anymore, while removing the molecules that were NOT altered because no light hit them, to grossly simplify the process. (even Polaroid film does this, it is just that the chemicals are embedded in a capsule on the film, and that capsule is broken when the film is removed from the camera, causing it to bathe the film).

Certain films require different chemicals, in different sequences. The chemicals and sequences for Kodachrome film are different than for Velvia, or other films, and for Kodachrome, are much more complicated (more chemicals, more steps, with very tight control over the time the film is in the chemicals, the strength of the chemicals, the temperature, etc.) That is why, as color films with simpler processes became available, fewer and fewer shops wanted to keep all the gear to process Kodachrome around, until there was only the shop in Parson left.

So you might be able to scan a developed Kodachrome negative on a good film scanner, pull it into your computer, and do "stuff" with it, but you still have to get the film developed first.

"Why exactly [hasn't] some decent Western power has had [sic] that vile repugnant monster Mugabe filled so full of holes you could use him as a soup strainer is beyond me.

Because you cannot bring about Democracy by force. Either the people are ready for it or they are not, and the single best test of "are they ready" is that they overthrow the tyrant (bonus points for NOT filling him full of holes, but trying him in a civilized manner).

If "some decent Western power" fills the sovereign leader of a foreign country full of holes, they immediately invalidate the adjective "decent".

Moreover, since the people aren't ready for Democracy, the result will just be the rise of a new tyrant.

"What in the world do the mormons have to do with it?"

Turn in your geek card, and report for remedial education.

"Better sequencing every living being's ADN"

Do too much LDS in the sixties?

Just like what happened when segfault.org went down - all the "Nude And Petrified" and "hot grits" crap started there, and when the parasites killed their host on segfault, they came to slashdot.

Pickens's idea was as follows:
1) while 1% of our electricity is from oil, about 25% is from gas.
2) Replace that 25% with wind.
3) Take the gas freed up and use it to power vehicles.
Result: Reduction of foreign oil.

Now, the problems with that plan were:
1) Wind is variable, and therefor cannot be used to replace base load generation, which is where much of the gas is used.
2) Wind power needs land. The land that has good wind is NOT where people need power, so you need to build transmission lines to move the power where it is needed.
3) BANANAs (Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything) will oppose both your wind farms and your transmission lines.

The only real way this sort of idea would have worked would have been if every wind turbine also had enough local storage (e.g. vanadium redox batteries) to store power so that you could make the turbine act like base load power. Normal power company policy is to take the baseplate power (e.g. 2 MW peak) and divide by 10 for wind. So, if each wind generator had roughly 5MW-Hour of storage, you could then average over 2 days, and make each turbine "act like" a 200kW base load generator. Of course, redox batteries aren't cheap, and the total cost of land+turbine+battery+transmission lines+shutting the BANANAs up is >> the current costs to make electricity with coal or gas.

The exploit was years ago, but you never know when somebody generated a key under the broken system, and hasn't regenerated their key due to (missing the memo|laziness|stupidity) and is still using a weak key.

So, many distros block the bad keys to force people to clean up.

"Why would any sane person possibly give McDonald's any of their personal information in the first place?"

Fixed that for you.

It's a damn burger, not a car - it's not like I have to finance the damn thing! I hand you money, you hand me something that, under bad light, might pass for food.

The closest they might get is if I charge the burger, and even then, all they get is a confirmation code from my credit card.

If the goal is to create a marketable product, it is DEVELOPMENT, not research.

Research is trying to find basic things that you can use to identify areas to roll into development.

Research SHOULD fail regularly ("fail" in this sense being "did not lead to areas to develop."). If it isn't failing regularly you aren't trying hard enough.

This is the key that too many businesses now-a-days miss.

During the era of IRA bombings, you kept a close eye on red-haired folks with Irish accents doing suspicious things like leaving luggage sitting about. Profiling of that type these days is not Politically Correct. We've legislated against common sense, hence we find it more palatable to frisk 85-year-old nuns and paraplegic veterans than actually single out members of groups that have committed 99.9% of the attacks against us.

Level 0: "Friendly pat" - no terror threat. Only theoretical, as we will never see this level.
Level 1: "First Knuckle" - be afraid citizen, but only a little, as the DHS will protect you. Now, cough, please.
Level 2: "Middle Finger" - citizen, we are going to have to "set aside" your rights for a bit. I hope you aren't allergic to latex.
Level 3: "Two in the stink" - prole, you will comply, for the good of the country.
Level 4: "Fist" - your papers are not in order. You vill follow us to the back room.
Level 5: "total(itarian) domination" - What searches? There are no searches! You have committed thoughcrime and wordcrime. Big Brother Loves You, and wants you to be better, and will re-educate you.

That is probably an excellent idea. I should find a good credit card vendor - with an online system that makes it easy to pay off purchases before they accrue any interest - and walk away from this check card bullshit.

That would be almost all of them, now-a-days. I don't ever mail in checks, I just go online. Of my three, I've had the most issues with Bank of America and Chase, but Discover has always been easy. Indeed, I could download my transactions into Gnucash and have my Discover up to date automatically.

I have one card that has a high enough limit to purchase a new car straight off a dealer lot [...]

That might not work as well as you think. I bought a new car back in '04. I had financing from my credit union, pre-approved for more than the cost of the car. But, you have this little dance: In order to issue the loan, you have to take the title to the credit union so they can put the lien against it. But, to get the title, you have to give the money to the dealer. But, to have the money, you need the loan. So, here we sit, deadlocked. I say "look, if nothing else, my limit on this card is almost twice what the car costs, and the card is paid up. Charge the car to the card, I get the loan, I pay the card." "Nope, the law doesn't allow us to let you buy a car on a credit card." (note: this may be Kansas specific, IANAL, IANYL, etc.). Finally, since I'd done business with the dealership before, they said "Just write us a check, when the money is in place, call us and we'll cash it."

[...]the last internet purchase I made on this card was through paypal [....]

That's a whole 'nuther ball of ugly there. I have those crooks only tied to one credit card, so that if they try to screw me, I tell the CC company to deny the charges and charge it back. As a friend of mine used to say, "Let's you and him fight".

"changes land on a daily basis".

Excuse me, but they already do. What the heck is update manager, but a means for updates to land when needed?

Whoever is stealing your info is being smart. They know that the instant they start using your card, the clock is running out. No matter what they buy, there is a chance you will notice. So, they can either
a) get as much value out of the card as possible as quickly, using your reaction time against you
or
b) try to be sneaky. They might get more money, or they might get less.

These people work on the principle of volume - they want to turn over as many cards as possible in as short a time as possible, to maximize their profits.

So, the compromise your card, they sell it on one of the myriad of sites just for that purpose for $50, and move on - they just made $50 for a relatively small amount of work.

The gold farming WoW thief that bought it then moves to quickly make as much off it as he can, knowing the WoW accounts will be close relatively quickly - but in that time he turns the $50 he spent on your card into WoW "gold" and then turns that into $100. Don't think about the $500 he "spent" on the WoW time - *he* didn't spend $500, he spent $50.

I've know people in the position to turn over to the credit card companies a significant fraud operation - hand it to them on a silver platter, all the CC company had to do was contact the police at the destination and they could have busted a group committing over $10K of fraud. The CC company wasn't interested - "Just don't send them the goods, or we will hold you accountable, bye [click]".

After all, why SHOULD the CC company care? They have successfully externalized the cost of fraud: for all they complain about fraud "costing them" millions, it doesn't cost them jack, as they just charge it all back to the vendor, even though the vendors did everything "by the book" and the CC were the ones who said the purchase was legit.

The only way this will get fixed will be to force the CC companies and banks to internalize the cost of fraud: If the merchant did all the steps to confirm the purchase as valid, and the CC said it was valid, then the merchant is off the hook, the card owner is off the hook, and the CC must eat the cost. Don't let the CCs charge annual fees, don't let them charge for balances paid off in full within the grace period, encourage people to do just that, and suddenly, when somebody calls the CC company to report fraud, the CC WILL call the cops - hell, they will likely start using the Pinkertons to follow up on fraud in the cases where the cops cannot or will not.

Bringing it down to a personal level:
1) Don't use a debit card for ANYTHING. Your risk exposure is too high.
2) Get a credit card that supports creating virtual sub-cards.
3) Set up a sub-card for each recurring charge you have that needs to be on a CC. Set a limit just over the maximum amount that account should see. Fund those cards only as needed.
4) Set up sub-cards for the various on-line sites you shop with. Again, set the limits reasonably, and fund them ONLY when needed.
5) Some CCs will allow you to have a secondary "low limit" card for daily use. Get that, and use it for things like restaurants and gas.
6) ONLY use the high-limit card for big ticket items. Don't let it out of your sight. Don't carry it unless you plan on needing it.

And I agree: ditch your bank. If you are getting zapped once a year, either you are being careless or you bank is. You can change the bank as a variable, as it will be more difficult to change your behavior.

Wow, those grapes look really sour from down here.

Naww, it's just Monkey Boy channeling Paul Reubens: <voice character="Pee Wee Herman">I meant do to that!<voice>