You can't go wrong with OpenEmbedded. BitBake recipes are ideal. It doesn't really sound like you need something as full-blown as Android, but I may be wrong. You say you need app management-- it would be nice to have some more details here, e.g. will the end-user be installing and removing apps on his or her own? I ask because it sounds like it's the only feature specific to Android you would actually use. I bet maintaining a BitBake repo would work just as well in your situation, but I'm just guessing. I would take a look at the Gumstix Overo platform.

"afabbro writes with news that Google is working to follow up its cloud music service with an MP3 store capable of competing with Amazon and Apple and Ubuntu One."

FTFY. I use Ubuntu One more than I use the other two.

Agreed. Similarly, it would be hilarious to jam the frequency and watch them sail through red lights.

"Java can be ~50 times the speed of PHP or Ruby."

That would matter if it was anywhere near as cool as Ruby.

That seriously wasn't one of the options? Well, that's my answer.

I'm jealous that you have one of those. I never got a chance to get my hands on one. Can you run Flash on there with Ubuntu?

Wait, what about those new FTL particles CERN found? After reading about them on every news site that existed and hearing from all the experts they consulted, I have come to the conclusion that faster-than-light travel IS possible!

On anything nearby (unopened mail, newspaper, random pieces of paper, you name it).

Haha, I don't disagree with you-- I think it's ridiculous. I just wanted to point out that that was his *point*.

If the scientists recommended to the policy-makers that the Earth was in trouble and we needed to increase R&D toward moving to other planets, I'd be all for it. But really? My Hummer?

No problem, in retrospect, I probably would have laughed in your position as well. For what it's worth, I agree that the emails are being misinterpreted. I just dislike "no you're wrong just because" arguments... pet peeve I guess.

If you meant your "no, that's bullshit" to be taken as regarding the interpretation of the emails rather than the fact it happened (as I took it), you could have specified. You could have also given a counter-argument, perhaps taken from the following: http://scienceblogs.com/islandofdoubt/2009/11/the_hacked_climate_science_ema.php or maybe http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/11/the-cru-hack/ . Do I need to do all your work for you?

The hack actually happened: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html . While what the emails imply may be in contention, his claim that it happened is not bullshit.

Great explanation. I'd mod you up, but I never have any points when I need them.

I think you just verified his point: "there isn't any particular evidence that people aren't sensitive." Studies which fail to find any such sensitivity doesn't mean such sensitivity doesn't exist, just that the studies can't find it.