There's already a rule about the size of the head but as usual it vaguely defined. As I remember it, "the head may not form a substantial part of the pint". This isn't helped by the fact that some drinks, e.g. lagers and ciders generally don't have much of a head at all, while others such as Guinness are expected to have a comparatively deep one.
The only way you're likely to get a landlord to top off your drink is if a) they're obviously taking the piss and b) you're not the only one at the bar. Having your punters see you fleece a customer is bad for business.
Why are foods being diverted to fuels or construction material - first corn, now bamboo....
In the first case it's because of the corn lobby. Bamboo, on the other hand, is actually good.
The article is light on details, which is giving me some trouble forming an opinion. If the photographer published these pictures then I agree wholeheartedly that doing so is an invasion of the subjects privacy. On the other hand, if I were to take some intimate pictures of my partner solely for my own enjoyment* that's a different matter entirely.
*How much enjoyment is to be had depends on how clean or messy the break-up was, I suppose.
Since the p-B reaction yields mostly photons...
Doesn't it yield alpha particles and not much else?
No one actually had to be in space to take those pictures.
Apart from when Hubble was launched or when it needed repairs.
It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.
