I keep seeing people shocked about this trend and I just don't get it. Don't THEY feel paranoid if their kids happen to be in an unreachable situation?
If people feel paranoid about this, something's wrong. Good parenting should enable your kids to handle "unreachable situations" (whatever that is). You should have trust in your kids' ability to grow into an independent person. Granted, a cell phone is a convenient thing to have and I accept that argument, but if you need it to ease your paranoia, then the issue is more with you rather than the kid.
GTD and Omnifocus works best for me. I often capture spontaneous thoughts immediately on my phone so I won't forget (and forget I'd otherwise do). Capturing literally everything is key here, and random notes are no exception.
I've tried a lot of GTD programs, but OmniFocus is the best one out there, not least for the fact that syncing via WebDAV allows me to not sell my soul (and potentially proprietary information) to Google or any other random website I don't trust.
but for math geeks FORTRAN is probably the easiest language to get from pencil-n-paper to computer. Math functions in FORTRAN translate nicely from their paper counter parts.
Nope, the easiest one for that purpose would actually be MATLAB (or octave, for that matter). If you want decent O-O with that, you can also use PyLab. Anyone who needs FORTRAN for whatever reason down the road can easily pick it up having been exposed to any of the above, but it should not be taught as a first programming language.
Just a note: Knowing how much of the planet is covered in water is *not* scientific literacy. That is trivia knowledge. [..]
Scientific literacy would be understanding (1) how to research science you need (2) how to conduct a proper experiment[..]
While this is obviously not a scientific statement, I would, however, guess that the correlation between someone knowing those facts and the same person being scientifically literate is rather strong. So, measuring scientific literacy by a quick survey like this is both faster and cheaper than a more elaborate test while still giving you reasonably accurate results.
when I go to the command line and I want to add a user, do I type:
ADDUSER nschubach
ADD USER nschubach
ADD ID nschubach
ADD LOGIN nschubach
LOGIN ADD nschubach
LOGINID ADD nschubach
USER ADD nschubach
USERADD nschubach
If it was in the GUI, there would simply be a text field and a button.
Well, actually there is a CLI equivalent to this. It is called command line completion. Just hit the tab key and you are presented with a set of alternatives. So, while your point for a GUI is well taken and while it is not quite the same as with a GUI, it is a reasonable remedy of the problem you presented.
Now don't get me started, however, on the point that in Ubuntu useradd and adduser don't do the same thing...
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer