This is a valid point. Trans/non-binary support is sadly still very rare online. However, I kinda doubt you care all that much, as you call us "transgenders" and "transgendered" (and seem to believe trans ladies and trans dudes are interchangeable?).

You can just click through to use the site normally. It's just a suggestion.

I don't hate Eich.

I think there's a big difference between discriminating against gay people, and people who actively campaign to make other people's lives worse.

This false equivalency "omg why don't you tolerate my intolerance" doesn't actually make ANY sense if you have anything beyond a dictionary-level understanding of the words. Tolerance doesn't mean "Don't be mean to the schoolyard bully." It means "Don't be the schoolyard bully."

The fact that he hasn't issued an apology makes forgiving him a little more difficult. (Yes, he offered a statement that was like "we as a company are committed to freedom," but it didn't address his prior actions or views).

Maybe once he deigns to say the word "sorry" I'll worry about whether or not he's a good person.

Shockingly, parent companies don't always dictate everything their sub companies do.

They'd be perfectly within their rights, just as OKCupid is. Or would you rather OKCupid refrain from expressing themselves on their own website, just because you don't like it? :)

I care.

You coulda taken the kids, sweetheart. In the overwhelming majority of splits, if the dad wants the kids, he gets them.

Why on Earth do you think that the appropriate way to punish the bigwigs making these decisions is to make the employees' lives harder?

The people against it spent a hell of a lot more money.

So, you think that straight & gay people could choose to be bisexual? I guess?

And sure, you legitimately think that. There are people who legitimately think the earth is 6000 years old, too. Doesn't make you any less wrong.

It's kinda telling that, for you, "competition" has to include shitting on people who aren't even involved, or you won't enjoy it.

Easy - the former is only said by people who think women are fragile beings who need protection by big strong men. Or, can you not tell the difference between MRAs and feminists?

It's not hard to extrapolate.

If I say "hey, hey, woah, let's check out BOTH SIDES of the evolution argument" - it's not hard to figure out that I don't "believe" in evolution. Just because your literal words sound objective, doesn't mean that they are.

Yes, saying that an unchangeable characteristic about a person is socially acceptable is too radical for Slashdot.

What's next? Games that say it's "okay" to be black?? Please, free market, save us from this terrible fate!