Your point is valid, but I think you have at least one historical misconception there.
I have no historical misconception. Here is the extract from an essay from Bertrand Russell, no less: http://bit.ly/r3O0Ym (Check the last lines in that page)
...but fall into the despairing slough of materialism.
I really have no idea what that means. Can someone please point me to an example of a society that has fallen under the despairing slough of materialism because of their irreligiousness? Or even a person for that matter? Please, before its too late! You see I am atheist and I don't want to fall into whatever "slough" this Bahai fellow is talking about.
Accomplishing that task does not require "writing a program". From recording your own audio, to presentation video etc, or using a voice-synth even, the problem doesn't demand such an involved solution as writing a program. If that guy was a programmer, he would know that. I call shenanigans.
He probably had elaborate exception handling done: what if the bride says, "No". What if he said no? What if someone in the audience speaks up instead of forever staying silent? What if the bride tripped on her dress and fell.... Seriously, there are an endless list of exceptional circumstances to consider, definitely worthy of a program!
Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky