Comment Re:Company A and Company B (Score 1) 196
You should not, however, be allowed to make minor changes, recompile it, and then sell it as your own.
You should not, however, be allowed to make minor changes, recompile it, and then sell it as your own.
A lot of video game companies teeter on the edge of bankruptcy. Sometimes it isn't corporate greed, but a collective failure to develop products that can sell enough to pay the real costs of producing it.
There are a few clever ways you could get around tagging produce items individually. One would be to put an id tag on bags, and track the contents of the bags in the store computer system. You could integrate that with the weighing process, perhaps, to streamline it.
You're right that there's a few tricky spots, and it's not perfectly clear how it would best be handled. Nevertheless, I think if you can get tags cheap enough, it would be a great application.
I find them much more convenient, as I have no need or desire to have a cashier do for me what I can probably do better myself.
One thing I like about them is that they're one step closer to the eventual future. At a certain point, there's going to be no more cashiers, as you'll just be able to walk out of the store without having to individually scan items, as they'll be tagged for remote sensing. Just swipe your credit card on the way out the door, authorise payment, and leave.
I doubt it. They devote an entire page to explaining why they don't use templates:
is that it does not run Windows legacy software like Windows XP and earlier versions did.
My brother is a Gamer, and he bought a Windows Vista Home Premium Laptop, it would not run his old games like Warlords IV and we tried a VirtualBox machine with Windows XP Pro in it but it had limited 3D support and Warlords IV would not run under it. His only option is to run Warlords IV on his old Windows XP Pro desktop, but then he cannot take the game with him on his laptop.
Have you tried installing in compatibility mode? A post on their forums suggests that it would work. Or, at least up to version 1.05.
There should be a requirement for ANY use of "non-lethal" weapons to be investigated as if it were the same as a lethal weapon.
Unless the cop would have used lethal force IN THE SAME SITUATION if "non-lethal" weapons were not available then the use of the "non-lethal" weapon should be enough to get said cop suspended.
That doesn't seem right to me. Use of a lethal weapon is definitely more serious, and should be treated as such. It's one thing to expect the use of non-lethal weapons to be treated seriously and investigated, but they shouldn't be treated equally when they are not.
As an analogy, it's important to investigate and punish petty thieves, but requiring an ongoing string of petty thefts to receive equal attention as an ongoing string of serial murders would be silly.
Goldman sax went bankrupt in 2008 didn't they?
Actually, Goldman Saches did not go bankrupt in 2008. In fact, they did relatively well throughout the crisis. Your response to the other poster explaining that they could have gone bankrupt while still making profit is also irrelevent, because they didn't go brankrupt.
I'm sure the days of searching for the right power adapter are limited.
Modding this funny was a brilliant but subtle touch. Whoever did that deserves a round of applause.
Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein