How can the human brain be hypothesized as being inefficient at processing subjective information? Where are the previous experimental data showing a probable inevitable threat in our timeline if we continue being bad at processing the information? What about the fact that humanity still exists in spite of said deficiency? Was that datum used in the forming of this hypothesis? Why is a divisive climate change article posted on Wednesday and not Friday? Why did Radio Shack want your phone number when you bought RCA video cables?

Then you took a snowpocalypse to the knee?

I'm more partial to Huehuecoyotl if I had to pin it down.

Just let hysterical climate change fanatics know that the ambiguous data used for their Most Resplendent Ever-Changing Computer Model is refuted as profane devil-worship, false witness, veneration of icons...whatever the fuck we need to do so they can maybe destroy each other, like reversing the polarity of a sound wave and combining the two...so we can have some damn silence.

Classic.

Might as well get the state involved in this and throw a few of the more-expensive-than-God's-stereo system Lightning II HUD helmets and throw a punter's faceguard and a star on them, I'm sure DARPA wouldn't mind offloading some of them since they didn't pay for them or anything.

Anyone play Grave Robbers on C-64 datasette, that's the best game ever.

This all depends, if it was a standard E-11 BlasTech sidearm then of course, but if it were the much more scary-looking DLT-19 skirmish rifle then you are obviously crazy.

This is why TK-421 isn't at his damn post.

Climate change story is a sign the weekend is finally here.

I love Alan Smithee's films.

I just got the vapors.

Gaff's origami unicorn means Deckard's a skinjob or maybe not.

Knock it off, Hudson.

This took a lot longer to happen than I thought it should've.