Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Oh FFS Slashdot (Score 1) 253

Thankfully, history is full of naive people who refused to accept "how things are" and did something to change reality instead. The complacent are nothing but an anchor holding back human progress...

You only hear about the successful ones. The ones that tried and failed aren't heard of, and I bet they'd make the vast bulk of folks trying to change the world. We *generally* aren't influential enough on our own, and I don't believe most people are capable of projecting the influence necessary to get things changed.

Idealism is also a great way to get oneself killed. It's not always a fight worth fighting with the limited time we'll be alive on this planet.

Comment Re:Oh FFS Slashdot (Score 1) 253

Which is why it's such a brilliant idea to leave the running of society ever more in the hands of large corporations.
I suppose that's what the submitter tries to point out.

I didn't say I was happy about Apple's position, morally; just pointing out it's how things are. Trying to bring morality/principals into the issue seems like the submitter is naïve about our reality.

I get surprised when the OPPOSITE happens with companies.

Comment Re:Flash not working (Score 1) 223

It's totally transparent and works great, the only downside is it's missing fullscreen

I don't consider a lack of fullscreen support as something that "works great".

Perhaps you can Compiz zoom into the video area, but it's messy and doesn't work as well as a proper fullscreen.

Comment Right (Score 4, Insightful) 465

So why are games like Operation Flashpoint, ArmA, the Rainbow Six series and so on available? They're there because people DO want realism, they want one-shot kills where stupid rambo behavior action will get you killed. Sure they're not for everyone, but for people who want a challenge, they exist.

This novelist asks for something that already exist.

Comment Re:Of course. Open source rarely gets the GUI righ (Score 1) 580

My biggest frustration when trying to sort out problems on other people's Windows boxes is the frequency with which one gets an error message which amounts to "Something went wrong, but we're not telling you what." The big mistake which the Windows developers make is hiding information from the user so even if you are capable of understanding the technical aspects of the problem, you're not allowed to see them.

Oh that's right, because Linux is so much better in this regard...

http://i.imgur.com/Y56vJ.png

Comment I don't get it (Score 1) 420

Why are they so obsessed with blocking porn? Are they really that prudish? And I though the US were the ultimate prudes (and hypocrites) when it came to sex.

It doesn't hurt anyone or break down society as near as I can tell. Plus, you can't stop the natural human natural instincts which hormones produce, short of requiring all men to take drugs to suppress the desire (Half-Life 2's suppression field anyone?)

The ONLY reason I can see for their obsessiveness with blocking porn is that it can be used as the basis for developing the technology and infrastructure necessary to block whatever it is they want. In other words, porn is used as a scapegoat for setting up the measures which can then be used to block other things, the stuff the Chinese Government ACTUALLY feels threatened about...

Comment New vs Old Slashdot (Score 2) 533

I notice several posts have been made regarding the current Slashdot con census regarding privacy. When some people say that they aren't worried about any privacy issues because they're too insignifant to care about as far as Google's concerned, some others pipe up and comment that in the "old days" of Slashdot, they'd be in the extreme minority, whereas nowadays it's fairly common to see this opinion.

Here's the problem - there IS no privacy on the Internet anymore. Compared to the old days of Slashdot, surveillance and logging has become so commonplace and pervasive, that even if you don't put your particulars on the Internet yourself, someone else might do it themselves. A good example would be a friend who uploads a picture on Facebook which has you tagged, even if you don't use Facebook. Heck, if you don't use it, you may not even know the picture exists until it's brought to your attention. At the very least, it's hard to remain isolated from the privacy issues of the Internet, short of becoming a hermit and avoiding any social contact.

So the reason privacy is being given up, as seen by some people, is because it's frigging tiring to have to check, double-check, workaround and in the end, give-up the fun and useful services and technologies available to us on the Internet, because very little of them respect total privacy. It's also hard to justify such extreme paranoia when it's highly unlikely you'll encounter any actual problems, so long as you use common sense.

In the end, we're all gonna die anyway, so freaking RELAX. Whatever privacy issues you were concerned about won't matter an iota regardless of whether you get buried, cremated or shot out of a canon into the sun.

PS. There's also the tiny fact that you WON'T CONVINCE EVERYONE about the importance of privacy anymore. That boat has sailed, given how much Facebook is used as a benchmark. So don't fret about worried how how you think privacy is becoming extinct. If you want to live in the modern digital age, it already has...

Comment Re:A view from Asia-Pacific (Score 1) 389

Feel free to disagree, but please provide a link to a high-end "netbook" with it.

I can't. Probably because anything I put forward will be disregarded as not being high-end enough (this is how Internet arguments work - you can't win).

What I was addressing was rather the perception that netbooks have to be low spec, that low spec is all they should be. Given the rate of technological improvements, I don't see it not being feasible for a netbook to house a decent 3D chipset and CPU to compete with mid-range laptops. Might suck up power moreso than other models, but that's a given with high-end equipment anyway.

Comment Re:A view from Asia-Pacific (Score 2, Insightful) 389

Even then they only have very low specs.

That's the point of a netbook.. and the reason why Linux is so popular on them.

Who said netbooks needed to be low spec? The same people who thought netbooks would only be used for browsing and light typing?

Netbooks are simply small computers. They should have the capability to do whatever we want with them - this argument that netbooks are destined to only be low spec is short-sighted.

Comment My experiences (Score 4, Interesting) 389

Some people say "Yay! Linux on netbooks means more mainstream acceptance!" From what I've seen however, this isn't the case. Linux netbooks, from what I've encountered, are

* Generally more expensive than their Windows counterparts (with identical specs)
* Running some dodgy Linux distro that does nothing to help sell the benefits of running Linux and only provides headaches
* Often simply not available

With this being the current situation, I don't see there being anything to be proud of. Yes, it's better than several years ago when Linux wasn't available anywhere mainstream. That doesn't mean things are going well either.

Slashdot Top Deals

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...