But the whole point of the project was to use cheaper, more off-the-shelf parts and components. Given that it's now ten years past it's 'guaranteed' lifespan, I don't think they did anything wrong.
Did FRAM even exist ten years ago?
The problem with the constitution was that it was largely a theoretical document. The Framers didn't have a lot of real-world examples to draw upon.
For example, the idea that all voting members would vote individually on each issue, and that nobody would ever form voting blocs or parties.
Or the idea that the loser in the presidential election should be VP.
How do you deal with, say, NTP update fixing your clock drift?
Personally, I like the idea of a 'second' being of variable length far better than shoehorning a '60' into a field that's clearly defined as '0 to 59'.
How many planets with liquid water, an atmosphere and a magnetosphere?
It's not even as simple as this. Even now, my kids public schools have material on the shelf that says 'all life gains energy from the sun, or via a linear chain of eating something that did,' but then have to point out that this is now proven wrong. Like the man said, 'It's life, Jim, but not as we know it.'
The odds that an individual sperm containing half of your DNA would be the one to fertilize an egg are so long that you can not possible exist. (Anybody got a car analogy?)
In Ontario, a license plate consists of seven alphanumerics. Call it 36 options per slot.
Tell me a license plate you saw on the way to work. Well, that's bullshit. There's a 1 in 36x36x36x36x36x36x36, or 1 in 78,364,164,096 chance you could have seen that license plate. Therefore, an omnipotent being MUST have put that exact license plate there.
That's the argument a lot of creationists try to put forward. 'The human genome is blah blah long, with blah blah possible combinations, so you personally couldn't have 'evolved,' the chances are too slim.' It's reductio ad absurdum.
Somebody needs to go re-read Revelations.
Remember, Christianity is an apocalyptic religion.
Copyright is supposed to be a restriction of our right to copy the works of others so that the other can profit from it for a short while - thereby giving the other an incentive to create. But giving up our right to copy forever was never the intention of the deal.
This. Copyright is supposed to be a *temporary* block on your natural right to make copies, in order to provide incentive to create and make public, and profit, during that temporary block.
The german version of 'NeoCon'.
Wow, that's open to a few interpretations.
Truck drivers get over $40k a year, and they don't drive 24/7.
I'd bet a trucking company would pay a lot for a driver-less truck, even if it could only travel a few routes.
So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand